Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 1;47(3):563–593. doi: 10.1177/0193841X221116721

Table 5.

Pooled Standardised Bias Estimates.

NRS Estimator (1) Standardized Numerical Difference* (2) Standardized Absolute Difference* (3) Standardized Absolute Difference** (4) Standardized Absolute Difference*** (5) Mean-Squared Error*** (6) Percent Difference*** (7) Percent Bias*** (8) Percent Bias Removed*** Number of Distance estimates$
Cross-section regression 0.232 0.236 0.229 0.290 0.180 340.8 26.3 33.9 10
IV regression 0.206 0.206 0.104 0.206 0.095 31.8 83.8 −29.6 3
IV (appropriate instrument) 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.007 0.000 1.1 3.0 95.4 1
IV (inappropriate instrument) 0.305 0.305 0.184 0.305 0.142 47.2 124.2 −92.1 2
Panel data regression (DD) 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.137 0.019 21.2 55.9 55.9 2
Matching 0.084 0.280 0.059 0.246 0.183 210.3 13.1 58.3 177
Matching on baseline outcome 0.120 0.120 0.039 0.044 0.004 1.6 4.3 55.9 14
Matching on local comparison −0.001 0.200 0.043 0.088 0.028 −9.0 −8.4 53.1 66
Matching with rich controls 0.025 0.282 0.031 0.232 0.124 178.4 8.4 81.3 116
Matching with parsimonious controls 0.208 0.321 0.087 0.354 0.305 353.8 25.9 44.9 44
Kernel matching 0.022 0.284 0.139 0.282 0.149 255.3 4.3 34.3 70
Local linear matching 0.179 0.257 0.201 0.285 0.133 267.8 18.3 21.4 6
Nearest neighbor matching 0.011 0.273 0.040 0.125 0.069 54.9 −2.4 51.5 58
Radius matching 0.154 0.256 0.215 0.280 0.143 100.8 11.0 236.6 6
RDD −0.015 0.048 0.025 0.012 0.000 7.3 8.0 94.2 173
RDD (prospective design) −0.037 0.073 0.052 0.064 0.008 −580.0 33.4 383.8 92
RDD (retrospective design) 0.009 0.020 0.014 0.010 0.000 33.1 6.9 81.5 81
RDD (ATE comparison)^ −0.057 0.091 0.038 0.029 0.002 34.4 17.6 0.1 71

Note. RDD = regression discontinuity design; DD = double-differences.

Notes: * simple average used to calculate pooled estimate; ** weighted average calculated using the inverse of the variance multiplied by the inverse of the number of estimates in the study; *** weighted average calculated using the benchmark sample size multiplied by the inverse of the number of estimates in the study; ^ indicates RDD estimate compared with RCT average treatment effect (ATE comparisons also incorporated Urquieta et al., 2009 and Lamadrid-Figueroa et al., 2010); $ sample size is for calculations in (1-7), calculations in (8) use a smaller number of studies owing to more limited availability of a prima facie estimate.