Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cryo Letters. 2020 Jul-Aug;41(4):185–193.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a-b) Early study on relationships between CCRs and concentrations, and CWRs and CCRs for solutions of single component CPAs in water (27, 53, 79). (a) CCRs for solutions of CPAs in water in relation to their concentrations. (b) CWRs as a function of CCRs for solutions of CPAs in water. (c-d) The same relationships including more recent data (circle represents the location of the data in Fig. 1a and b). Symbols: ★: Water estimated by Bald (5), 25CF: Water estimated by Bruggeller and Mayer (20), +: 2,3-Butanediol (6, 9, 13, 75), ◆:1,2-Propanediol (6, 9, 74, 84), : Ethylene glycol l (6, 8, 11, 34, 84), ▲: Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (6, 11, 34, 75), ◑: Glycerol (6, 34, 81, 84), ▼: 1,3Butanediol (6), ◮: 1,2,3-Butanetriol (6), △:Diethylformamide (DEF) (6), ■: dimethylformamide (DMF) (6), ♀: 1,4-Butanediol (6), *: 1,3-Propanediol (6), ☒: PEG 200 (11, 34)