Table 1.
Categorization of independent variables
Variable | Categorization | |
---|---|---|
Exposure to family planning mass media messages | Yes and No | Composite variable where exposure to family planning messages either on radio or television or newspapers or phone texts was a yes |
Source of family planning method | Government and private health facilities | - |
Access to internet | Yes and No | - |
Age | 15 to 19 years and 20 to 24 years | - |
Residence | Urban and Rural | - |
Region | Northern, Eastern, Southern, Western and Northwestern | - |
Religion | Muslims and Christians and others | - |
sex of household head | Male and female | - |
level of education | No education, primary, secondary and tertiary | - |
Working status | Yes and No | - |
Wealth index | Richest, richer, middle, poorer and poorest quintiles | - |
Having visited a health facility within the last 12 months | Yes and No | - |
Having been visited by a field health worker within the last 12 months | Yes and No | - |
Problems seeking permission and distance to health facility | No big problems and Big problems | SLDHS had three original categories (no problem, no big problem and big problem) however, after data collection, no woman reported no problem |
Problems with distance to nearest health facility | No big problems and Big problems | SLDHS had three original categories (no problem, no big problem and big problem) however, after data collection, no woman reported no problem |
Marital status | Married and Not married | Married included both formal and informal unions |