Table 5.
Image modality | Number of patients | Cancer | Target | Number of radiomics features | Commercial or open-source software | Method | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CT | 188 | HNSCC | Cancer recurrence rate | 107 | PyRadiomics, 3D Slicer, Matlab |
ML: LOOCV SM: Chi-square test DL: Deep learning artificial neural networks |
[28] |
FDG-PET | 174 | OPC | The risk of local failure | 2–3 | Matlab, Stata/MP |
ML: LOOCV, Cox proportional-hazards regression, Fine and Gray’s proportional sub-hazards model, LR, fivefold CV SM: Kaplan–Meier analysis, log-rank test, Spearman correlation analysis |
[29] |
CT | 465 | OPC | Local recurrence | 2 | Matlab |
ML: Bootstrap resampled recursive partitioning analysis, Regression model, DT, Cox proportional hazards model SM: Log-rank and Wilcoxon test, Effect likelihood ratio test, Wald test |
[36] |
MRI | 285 | HNSCC | Local tumor recurrence | 20 | MITK, SPM, Matlab, R |
ML: LASSO, tenfold CV SM: t-test, Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, Delong test, Spearman correlation analysis |
[37] |
US | 83 | Breast cancer | Recurrence | 4 | Matlab, SPSS |
ML: KNN, SVM SM: Shapiro–Wilk test, t-test, Mann–Whitney test, Kaplan–Meier product-limit method |
[38] |
CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, FDG fluorodeoxyglucose, PET positron emission tomography, US ultrasonography, ML machine learning, SM statistical method, DL deep learning, HNSCC head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, OPC oropharyngeal cancer, LOOCV leave one out cross validation, LR logistic regression, CV cross validation, DT decision tree, LASSO least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, KNN K-nearest neighbors, SVM support vector machine