Table 3.
Estimated coefficients of week based on linear mixed models for each type of hassles and uplifts (trend slopes).
| Estimated coefficient of week showing weekly change | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Coefficient | 95% CI | P-value1 |
| Uplifts Social Intensity | |||
| Improved group | 0.004 | (−0.002, 0.009) | 0.1646 |
| Unchanged group | −0.004 | (−0.008, 0.001) | 0.1057 |
| Worsened group | 0 | (−0.004, 0.004) | 0.9480 |
| Uplifts Non-social Intensity | |||
| Improved group | 0 | (−0.003, 0.004) | 0.8602 |
| Unchanged group | −0.002 | (−0.005, 0.001) | 0.1760 |
| Worsened group | 0 | (−0.003, 0.003) | 0.9327 |
| Uplifts Social Frequency | |||
| Improved group | −0.02 | (−0.039, −0.001) | 0.0386 |
| Unchanged group | −0.02 | (−0.037, −0.003) | 0.0194 |
| Worsened group | −0.023 | (−0.039, −0.008) | 0.0033 |
| Uplifts Non-social Frequency | |||
| Improved group | −0.031 | (−0.098, 0.035) | 0.3554 |
| Unchanged group | −0.004 | (−0.065, 0.057) | 0.8866 |
| Worsened group | −0.073 | (−0.129, −0.017) | 0.0110 |
| Hassles Social Intensity | |||
| Improved group | −0.002 | (−0.007, 0.004) | 0.5620 |
| Unchanged group | 0.003 | (−0.002, 0.008) | 0.2042 |
| Worsened group | 0.004 | (−0.000, 0.008) | 0.0794 |
| Hassles Non-social Intensity | |||
| Improved group | −0.003 | (−0.007, 0.000) | 0.0510 |
| Unchanged group | 0 | (−0.003, 0.003) | 0.9860 |
| Worsened group | 0.003 | (0.000, 0.006) | 0.0330 |
| Hassles Social Frequency | |||
| Improved group | −0.018 | (−0.042, 0.006) | 0.1444 |
| Unchanged group | −0.005 | (−0.027, 0.017) | 0.6814 |
| Worsened group | −0.008 | (−0.029, 0.012) | 0.4210 |
| Hassles Non-social Frequency | |||
| Improved group | 0.021 | (−0.023, 0.066) | 0.3500 |
| Unchanged group | −0.025 | (−0.063, 0.013) | 0.1937 |
| Worsened group | 0 | (−0.035, 0.034) | 0.9817 |
1
p-values were based on T-test from linear mixed models.