Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 22;10(5):744–756. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51757

Table 1.

Demographics of NIA‐LOAD FBS and EFIGA cohort.

NIALOAD
Total samples 3676
Number of cases 1748
Number of controls 1928
Number of unrelated individuals 846
Number of families 666
Mean number of individuals per family 4.25 ± 2.67
Average age of cases 74.66 ± 7.87
Average age of controls 77.37 ± 7.95
EFIGA
Full dataset Training Testing
Total samples 8512 5110 3402
Number of cases 3317 1986 1331
Number of controls 5195 3124 2071
Number of unrelated individuals 6474 4011 2751
Number of families 1 464 (100%) 307 (66%) 211
−45%
Mean number of individuals per family 4.39 3.58 3.09
Average age of cases 76.53 76.42 76.68
Average age of controls 75.5 75.55 75.42

To estimate genome‐wide effect‐sizes of variants in a Caribbean Hispanic population, we randomly divided the full dataset into training and testing sets (preserving the ratio of affected and unaffected individuals). Variant effect‐size estimates for AD‐association were computed in the training dataset across the genome. PRS was computed in the testing dataset using the effect sizes from the training dataset. Penetrance and recurrence risk of the PRS was subsequently computed in the testing dataset.

1

Individuals were randomly split between training and testing datasets, which resulted in some families having members in both training and testing datasets.