Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2022 Jan 3;10(2):691–695. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07394

Table 1.

Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms-1848832-t0002.jpg
entry base (equiv) 2a (equiv) solvent 3 yield (%)b 1a recovered (%)b
1 DBU (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 89 (A) -
2 Et3N (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 10 (A) 90
3 DIPEA (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 12 (A) 87
5 K2CO3 (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 34 (B) 60
6 LiOtBu (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 58 (B) 39
7 - 3.0 CH3CN 9 (B) 90
8c DBU (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 6 (B) 83
9d DBU (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN - (B) 97
10e DBU (3.0) 3.0 CH3CN 85 (B) trace
11 DBU (2.0) 3.0 CH3CN 92 (B) trace
12 DBU (3.0) 2.0 CH3CN 66 (B) 23
13e DBU (2.0) 3.0 CH3CN/H2O (1:3) 90 (B) 4
14e DBU (2.0) 3.0 CH3CN/H2O (1:9) 87 (B) 6
15e DBU (2.0) 3.0 H2O 72 (B) 15
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.6 mmol), DBU (0.6 mmol), solvent (1 mL), room temperature around the reaction flask is 35 °C (heating caused by the 456 (A) or 427 nm (B) LED lamp), under argon, 24 h.

b

Yields are based on 1a, determined by 1H NMR using dibromomethane as an internal standard.

c

The reaction was performed in the absence of PTZ.

d

The reaction was performed in the dark, covered by aluminum foil.

e

The reaction was performed in air.