Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 May 16;18(5):e0285772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285772

Breast cancer-related lymphedema and recurrence of breast cancer: Protocol for a prospective cohort study in China

Linli Zhuang 1,*, Qian Chen 2, Huaying Chen 3, Xuemei Zheng 3, Xia Liu 4, Zhenzhen Feng 3,5, Shaoyong Wu 3, Li Liu 3, Xiaolin Shen 1
Editor: Ibrahim Umar Garzali6
PMCID: PMC10187897  PMID: 37192209

Abstract

Introduction

The primary aim is to determine the factors associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema and to identify new associated factors for the recurrence of breast cancer and depression. The secondary objective is to investigate the incidence of breast cancer-related events (breast cancer-related lymphedema, recurrence of breast cancer, and depression). Finally, we want to explore and validate the complex relationship among multiple factors influencing breast cancer complications and breast cancer recurrence.

Patients and methods

A cohort study of females with unilateral breast cancer will be conducted in West China Hospital between February 2023 and February 2026. Breast cancer survivors in the age range of 17–55 will be recruited before breast cancer surgery. We will recruit 1557 preoperative patients with a first invasive breast cancer diagnosis. Consenting breast cancer survivors will complete demographic information, clinicopathological factors, surgery information, baseline information, and a baseline depression questionnaire. Data will be collected at four stages: the perioperative stage, chemotherapy therapy stage, radiation therapy stage, and follow-up stage. Data including the incidence and correlation of breast cancer-related lymphedema, breast cancer recurrence, depression, and medical cost will be collected and computed through the four stages above. For every statistical analysis, the participants will be classified into two groups based on whether they develop secondary lymphedema. Incidence rates of breast cancer recurrence and depression will be calculated separately for groups. Multivariate logistic regression will be used to determine whether secondary lymphedema and other parameters can predict breast cancer recurrence.

Discussion

Our prospective cohort study will contribute to establishing an early detection program for breast cancer-related lymphedema and recurrence of breast cancer, which are both associated with poor quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Our study can also provide new insights into the physical, economic, treatment-related and mental burdens of breast cancer survivors.

Introduction

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is closely related to a high risk of cancer-related treatment, breast cancer recurrence, and disability [1]. In breast cancer patients, secondary lymphedema is a symptom cluster encompassing progressive upper-limb swelling, skin changes, limb numbness, pain and discomfort, restricted range of motion, and nonpitting edema [2]. These would decrease physical and mental function, increase disease burden and increase financial costs. It is a common complication in breast cancer patients [36]. Considering the establishment of a baseline of the upper limb and tracking changes, a screening cohort of secondary lymphedema may be the optimal solution to develop screening programs and evaluate the prevalence of breast cancer-related lymphedema in China.

Breast cancer recurrence (BCR) is a negative outcome in patients with breast cancer after either mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy (BCT) [7]. Breast cancer can recur locally, regionally, and/or at distant metastatic sites [8]. It is a hammer blow for breast cancer survivors [9]. It directly threatens breast cancer survivors’ life expectancy and decreases their quality of life. BCRL and BCR share risk factors such as higher BMI, pathological type, breast cancer location, tumor node metastasis(TNM) staging and comorbidities, and treatment-related factors (surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) [10]. Early detection helps implement personal and precise medical precautions for patients with secondary lymphedema (or breast cancer recurrence).

Up to 30% of breast cancer survivors have depressive symptoms [11]. Depressive affect includes emotional lability, irritability, and social withdrawal [12]. Depression is an emotional difficulty associated with an increased disease burden and treatment-related cost and a decreased ability to cope with breast cancer. Fear of cancer recurrence also directly affects mental health, especially anxiety and depression [13].

These three factors are significant risk factors for the disease burden of breast cancer. The disease burden of breast cancer is an area of concern [14]. The disease burden of breast cancer is a multidimensional construct comprising surgery, oncology-related treatment, drug costs and depression, and other elements destroying everyday life [15]. Therefore, a comprehensive screening plan that is feasible and responsive to reality may alleviate the symptom burden and reduce the economic burden of breast cancer patients.

Based on the retrospective data of the electronic medical record system in West China Hospital, we found a 3-year BCRL incidence rate of 17.57% after breast surgery or breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. The rate of BCR occurrence was 15.53% at three years. A previous study found that breast cancer recurrence may harm breast cancer-related lymphedema. However, whether BCRL is associated with the risk of breast cancer recurrence is uncertain. Moreover, there is a lack of evidence regarding the correlation between BCR, BCRL, and depressive symptoms, and there is also inadequate knowledge regarding the disease burden of breast cancer. This study aims to establish and evaluate whether a comprehensive screening plan for breast cancer may catch cancer early and improve the health situation and prognosis.

Patients and methods

This study is a prospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors. This study aimed to investigate and evaluate the incidence and correlation of BCRL, BCR, and depression. The primary outcome measures include the incidence and correlation of BCRL and BCR within three years. Choice of the time frame because three years is a high-incidence period of BCRL and BCR. The secondary outcome is depression.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study period is between February 2023 and February 2026. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital (Approval No. of ethics committee: 2019 Annual Review No. 664). Registration number: ChiCTR1900025534 (Name of the registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) http://www.chictr.org.cn/)

Our cohort study is in line with the international ethical principles and ethical processes of West China Hospital. All participants provided written informed consent. Breast cancer survivors will be informed that their identifying information will be confidential before participating in our cohort study. Fully informed consent will be obtained because the total duration of the study will span almost three years. Participants can withdraw at any time from the study. Fig 1 shows the participant flow.

Fig 1. CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.

Fig 1

Study sample

We will conduct a prospective cohort study of females with unilateral breast cancer in West China Hospital. We will recruit breast cancer patients between the ages of 18 and 55 years who will receive unilateral radical mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy, postoperative chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Patients with breast cancer will be the first breast cancer diagnosed in West China Hospital, and the data on surgery and treatment will be extracted from the electronic medical record system. This cohort study will commence one week before breast cancer surgery and conclude after the three-year follow-up period.

Our study will need 1557 preoperative patients with a first-time invasive breast cancer diagnosis. Patients must meet the following criteria for inclusion.

  • Female subjects with ages older than 18 years and less than 55 years.

  • Understand and sign the informed consent.

  • Recruited in West China Hospital.

  • First diagnosis of invasive breast cancer.

  • Breast cancer patients will receive either radical or modified radical mastectomy.

There are four exclusion criteria; they are described briefly below.

  • Patients with bilateral breast cancer

  • Patients had previously received neoadjuvant radiotherapy treatment before.

  • Patients could not complete all the treatments and 3-year follow-up.

  • There is significant asymmetry in the size of the upper extremities.

  • The patients had cardiac dysfunction or renal and hepatic insufficiency.

Study procedure

Baseline assessment. Basic demographic and treatment information will be collected through an electronic medical record system. Our study will gather self-reported demographic information, including age, sex, marital status, education level, etc. We will obtain surgery and treatment information, including surgery date, surgery type (axillary lymph node dissection or sentinel lymph node dissection), the total number of dissected lymph nodes, chemotherapy regimen, radiotherapy regimen, and cycle number of treatment (chemotherapy/radiotherapy).

Ongoing assessment. Table 1 shows the standard assessment process of the follow-up assessment of our study. Clinical evaluations will include evaluations of BCRL, RBC, and depression. At each follow-up visit, patients will receive an upper-limb volume assessment and physical and imaging examination [16]. The research nurse will help them complete the Beck Depression Inventory-II questionnaire about patients’ mental status.

Table 1. The standard assessment process in cohort study—time points and primary outcomes.
Time point BMI Patients with secondary lymphedema or not Patients with oncology recurrence or not Beck Depression
Inventory II
Medicine cost
Perioperative stage
before surgery / /
Chemotherapy therapy stage
circle 1
circle 2
circle 3
circle(4.5.6 …n- 1)
circle(n)—last circle
Radiation therapy stage
before radiation therapy
after radiation therapy
Follow-up stage
9th month(after surgery)
1st year(after surgery)
15th month(after surgery)
18th month(after surgery)
21th month(after surgery)
2nd years(after surgery)
27th month(after surgery)
30th month(after surgery)
33th month(after surgery)
3rd year(after surgery)

Diagnosis standards

Diagnosis of BCRL: We used a 200 ml limb volume difference as the diagnostic standard. The 200 ml limb volume difference standard is a universal criterion recommended by the 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology [2]. The limb volume difference will be measured with a Perometer device(an automated optoelectronic measurement of arm circumferences) [17].

Diagnosis of RBC: Physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for screening surveillance of breast cancer survivors. Breast cancer survivors who had biopsy-proven recurrence of breast cancer at presentation documented by fine-needle aspiration biopsy or core needle biopsy [1821].

Diagnosis of depression: The screening tool will be the Beck Depression Inventory-II. We used the Beck Depression Inventory-II rubric; The scores are subdivided into the following grades: minimal(0–13 points), mild(14–19 points), moderate(20–28 points), and severe (greater than 29 points) [22, 23].

Record

We will record the outcomes in detail, including the onset time, diagnosis time, symptoms, adherence, and medicine cost. The incidence in each stage will be calculated and used to explore complex relationships among the outcomes.

Data collection

Data will be collected at four stages: the perioperative stage, chemotherapy therapy stage, radiation therapy stage, and follow-up stage. Having completed the previous phase, we move on to the next. The total expenditure on healthcare will be computed for each treatment period. All authors could access information that could identify individual participants during data collection and statistical analysis.

First stage—perioperative stage

Data will be collected at the time of the perioperative stage, including demographic data (sex, age, race, ethnicity, marital status, socioeconomic status, educational status, and BMI), clinicopathological factors (pathological type, breast cancer location, TNM staging, and comorbidities), surgery information (date of diagnosis, date of surgery, type of surgery, type of surgical incision, lymph node management, the total number of dissected lymph nodes), and baseline information (upper-limb volume difference, scale results of Beck Depression Inventory-II). Patient information in the perioperative stage will be collected through the electronic medical record after obtaining written informed consent. We will manage to build a follow-up database preoperatively. We will use this follow-up database for baseline and data collection, transfer, and storage.

Secondary stage—chemotherapy therapy stage

Data will be collected at the time of the chemotherapy therapy stage, including the number of chemotherapy cycles, body mass index (BMI), upper limb volume measurement, assessment of tumor recurrence, and scale results of the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Once they receive the first round of chemotherapy, participants will be followed up in a regular oncology ward each cycle. Data collectors will conduct breast cancer-related lymphedema surveillance through upper-limb volume measurements. For patients who increase the upper-limb volume difference by more than 200 ml, secondary lymphedema is confirmed and diagnosed by a physician and physical therapist. Data will be collected at the time of the radiation therapy stage including the total number of radiation therapy cycles, body mass index (BMI), upper limb volume measurement, assessment of tumor recurrence, and scale results of the Beck Depression Inventory-II.

Third stage—radiation therapy stage

Radiation therapy cycles terminate at relatively short times. Therefore, data on the main factors will only be collected before radiation therapy cycles and after stopping the planned radiation treatment.

Last stage—follow-up stage

The follow-up stage is also the last stage of our cohort study. After finishing radiation and chemotherapy treatment, patients will be followed until 3 years after breast cancer surgery. Postoperative breast cancer patients are exposed to a chance of recurrence. The implementation of guideline-recommended follow-up plans for breast cancer patients is necessary. The patients in our study will be seen for follow-up visits once every three months [24]. Data will be collected at the time of the follow-up stage including BMI, upper limb volume measurement, assessment of tumor recurrence, and scale results of the Beck Depression Inventory II. Detailed cohort protocols in the four research stages are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Detailed cohort protocols in four research stages.
Perioperative stage

Demographic data
gender, age, race, ethnicity, marital status, socioeconomic status, educational status and body mass index (BMI)
Clinicopathological factors pathological type, breast cancer location, TNM staging and comorbidities

Surgery information
date of diagnosis, date of surgery, type of surgery, type of surgical incision, Lymph node management, the total number of dissected lymph nodes
Baseline information arm circumferences, scale results of Beck Depression Inventory-II
Financial information treatment related cost
Chemotherapy therapy stage
Time points information the number of chemotherapy cycles

Main information
body mass index(BMI), arm volume measurement (secondary lymphedema), assessment of tumor recurrence, scale results of Beck Depression Inventory-II
Financial information treatment related cost
Radiation therapy stage
Time points information total number of radiation therapy cycles

Main information
body mass index (BMI), arm volume measurement (secondary lymphedema), assessment of tumor recurrence, scale results of Beck Depression Inventory-II
Financial information treatment related cost
Follow-up stage
Time points information the number of follow-up cycles

Main information
body mass index (BMI), arm volume measurement (secondary lymphedema), assessment of tumor recurrence, scale results of Beck Depression Inventory-II
Financial information treatment related cost

Quality assurance

To ensure the uniformity of data, all the nurses in our study will undergo unified training about the measurement of arm volume and how to provide guidance when patients complete the questionnaire. Arm volume will be measured twice, in the morning and at night, and the average of two measurements will be used in the analyses to minimize errors. All oncologists will receive unified training, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis and diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence. Moreover, loss to follow-up will continue to hinder the data completeness of our cohort study. Therefore, the computer and application are programmed to alert patients by telephone and message before one day when breast cancer patients need to complete the follow-up.

Sample size calculation

Sample size will be estimated using the sample size estimation formula for prevalence studies. (N=μα22(1p)pd2) [24, 25]. The formally required sample size calculation was based on the actual incidence of the primary outcomes in the electronic medical record system of West China Hospital. The maximum permissible error is 2%. Based on retrospective data from the electronic medical record system from 2017 to 2020 in West China Hospital, we found a 3-year BCRL incidence rate of 17.57% after breast surgery or breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer. The rate of BCR occurrence was 15.53% at three years. Assuming a 10% dropout rate, at least 1557 participants should be recruited in our cohort study. We are trying to recruit more breast cancer patients, considering the longevity of the study.

Statistical analyses

The following primary factors will be calculated when each of the study stages (perioperative stage, chemotherapy therapy stage, radiation therapy stage, follow-up stage) is completed: BCRL incidence, RBC rate, and incidence of depression. To calculate the incidence of the primary outcomes, we will sum the total of participants within each of the stages as the denominator and sum the total of people with one of the primary outcomes as the numerator. For every statistical analysis, the participants will be classified into two groups based on whether they developed secondary lymphedema. Incidence rates of breast cancer recurrence and depression will be calculated separately for groups. The chi-square test will be used to compare the rates rate between the two groups [26]. As a secondary outcome, depression symptoms will be repeatedly measured in this study. The results of the assessment of depression symptoms will be compared across periods and between treatment-related events using statistical analysis with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

We will identify clinicopathological factors, surgery information, lymph node management, breast cancer-related treatment, and body mass index(BMI) as risk factors due to their reported associations with secondary lymphedema, recurrence of breast cancer, and depression symptoms. Multivariate logistic regression will be used to determine whether secondary lymphedema and other parameters can predict breast cancer recurrence. To assess the correlates with these risk factors and outcomes, we will describe the strength of the association using clinically meaningful and statistically significant effect sizes, and a correction will be based on demographic characteristics.

Missing data

We will assess missing data and record the study stage and reasons for missing data. Data in the previous stage will be retained and calculated if patients are lost to follow-up at this stage of the study. Missing data will not be handled using estimation.

Availability of data and materials

The data should remain confidential. Only qualified researchers and data analysts can access raw data in our study. All demographic data will be deidentified by allocating numbers to all patients. The datasets that will be used during the study are available on reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author. Dissemination activities will include peer-reviewed publications and international conferences.

Patient and public involvement

No patient or public is involved.

Discussion

The outcomes of our cohort study will include the following: (1) Exploratory analysis of breast cancer-related lymphedema to establish the screening program for secondary lymphedema. (2) Exploratory analysis of recurrence of breast cancer to estimate the incidence of recurrence of breast cancer. (3) Continuous assessment of depression during the perioperative, treatment, and follow-up periods. (4) Whole-course analysis of the incidence rate of secondary lymphedema, recurrence of breast cancer, depression, and calculation of hospital and treatment costs. (5) Whether breast cancer survivors with secondary lymphedema have a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence remains unknown. Our study is explorative. We would like to know whether early screening of secondary lymphedema could be an addition to improving early detection and early treatment of breast cancer recurrence. (6) The development of rich related data on breast cancer, including personal characteristics, clinicopathological factors, surgical factors, treatment factors, and financial and mental burdens, can lead to the assessment of the impacts of breast cancer on breast cancer survivors. On review of the literature, there is no previous longitudinal cohort that gives serious consideration to all six points related to breast cancer survivors. However, these factors have direct and indirect effects on health. Therefore, all the participants in our study would benefit from a timely screening program. The results of this study will inform the establishment of a package plan for the early screening of breast cancer survivors.

Among patients with breast cancer treated, we found that being diagnosed with breast cancer-related lymphedema is associated with a modestly increased risk of breast cancer recurrence [27]. Breast cancer-related lymphedema dramatically impacts the quality of life. Secondary lymphedema, a primary complication, causes the most disability in breast cancer survivors [28]. Cancer recurrence threatens patients’ lives. Cancer recurrence drives the most deaths from breast cancer. According to evidence-based data, the presence of new-onset lymphedema should be confirmed to determine whether breast cancer first recurs. Moreover, conservative management is becoming the treatment of choice for secondary lymphedema. However, complete decongestive therapy (the first choice of conservative management) will not be used if the neoplasm is the cause of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Early screening and identification of secondary lymphedema and recurrence of breast cancer are of enormous significance to breast cancer medical prognosis. However, there is no continuous assessment longitudinal cohort established in China. We will focus on the correlation assessment between secondary lymphedema and breast cancer recurrence. This work will be the cornerstone of a well-directed screening program and help to develop a well-defined intervention. In the era of heightened whole-course management, serious complication screening and recurrence identification of breast cancer survivors may be even more important.

We will also focus on the economic and mental burdens of breast cancer [29, 30]. It is associated with poor physical function, role function, emotional function, cognitive function, and social function. This is because depression magnifies the possibility of negative outcomes and spends more cost and time on breast cancer-related treatment. There is no mandated screening program for depression in breast cancer survivors in China. It is unknown whether breast cancer-related treatment and drug costs correlate with an increased risk for depression. As a result, longer follow-up studies of depression and medicine-related costs can provide more information about the long-term economic and mental burden of breast cancer survivors. Moreover, financial stress is well-established as an important reason for depression. The hospital and treatment expenses of breast cancer patients are the slowly draining income of patients and their families. Fear of breast cancer recurrence and financial stress may produce the negative effect of making the person more depressive.

Limitations

Data from breast cancer patients will only be collected from a large district general hospital. It is difficult to put the scheme of further multicentric trials into practice under the normalization of epidemic prevention and control. Moreover, similar to other cohort studies, the situation in which breast cancer survivors are lost to follow-up seems inevitable. The completeness of treatment and follow-up data will be important to assess the correlation between breast cancer-related lymphedema and recurrence and disease burden (depression and medicine cost). Loss of follow-up will continue to hinder the data completeness of our cohort study.

Supplements

All the ethical and funding approval documentation has been uploaded as Study Protocol Proofs. We received governmental funding, and the study protocol has undergone peer review by the funding bodies.

Our study is a proposed study that has not completed participant recruitment at the time of submission. No publications containing the results of this study have already been published or submitted to any journal.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank for the support of the fund, thanks for the help of everybody in our study groups.

Data Availability

Deidentified research data will be made publicly available when the study is completed and published.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Support Program (2015SZ017). The funders had and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Bundred N, Foden P, Todd C, Morris J, Watterson D, Purushotham A, et al. Increases in arm volume predict lymphoedema and quality of life deficits after axillary surgery: a prospective cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2020;123(1):17–25. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0844-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Executive Committee of the International Society of Lymphology. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020;53(1):3–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rafn BS, Christensen J, Larsen A, Bloomquist K. Prospective Surveillance for Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(9):1009–1026. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhuang L, Chen H, Zheng X, Wu S, Yu Y, Lan L, et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis for early screening of upper limb subclinical lymphedema: A case-control study. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0274570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hasenoehrl T, Palma S, Ramazanova D, Kölbl H, Dorner TE, Keilani M, et al. Resistance exercise and breast cancer-related lymphedema-a systematic review update and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(8):3593–3603. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05521-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(6):500–515. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Czajka ML, Pfeifer C. Breast Cancer Surgery. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; September 12, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marinac CR, Nelson SH, Breen CI, Hartman SJ, Natarajan L, Pierce JP, et al. Prolonged Nightly Fasting and Breast Cancer Prognosis. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(8):1049–1055. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rockson SG, Keeley V, Kilbreath S, Szuba A, Towers A. Cancer-associated secondary lymphoedema. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0072-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gillespie TC, Sayegh HE, Brunelle CL, Daniell KM, Taghian AG. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, precautionary measures, and treatments. Gland Surg. 2018;7(4):379–403. doi: 10.21037/gs.2017.11.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hahn EE, Munoz-Plaza CE, Pounds D, Lyons LJ, Lee JS, Shen E, et al. Effect of a Community-Based Medical Oncology Depression Screening Program on Behavioral Health Referrals Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;327(1):41–49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harshfield EL, Pennells L, Schwartz JE, Willeit P, Kaptoge S, Bell S, et al. Association Between Depressive Symptoms and Incident Cardiovascular Diseases. JAMA. 2020;324(23):2396–2405. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hall DL, Jimenez RB, Perez GK, Rabin J, Quain K, Yeh GY, et al. Fear of Cancer Recurrence: A Model Examination of Physical Symptoms, Emotional Distress, and Health Behavior Change. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(9):e787–e797. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang Y, Ding Y, Zhu N, Mi M, Lu Y, Zheng J,et al. Emerging patterns and trends in global cancer burden attributable to metabolic factors, based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1032749. Published 2023 Jan 19. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1032749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bencina G, Chami N, Hughes R, Weston G, Baxter C, Maciejczyk A, et al. Breast cancer-related mortality in Central and Eastern Europe: years of life lost and productivity costs. J Med Econ. 2023;26(1):254–261. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2169497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Senkus E, Kyriakides S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Thompson A, Zackrisson S, et al. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24 Suppl 6:vi7–vi23. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Adriaenssens N, Buyl R, Lievens P, Fontaine C, Lamote J. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm. Lymphology. 2013;46(3):132–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):771–784. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, Cortés J, de Azambuja E, DeMichele A, et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1475–1495. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Abraham J, Aft R, Agnese D, Allison KH, et al. Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(4):452–478. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kataja V, Castiglione M; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2009. May;20 Suppl 4:10–4. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang YP, Gorenstein C. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct-Dec;35(4):416–31. doi: 10.1590/ 1516-4446-2012-1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Iltis AS, Misra S, Dunn LB, Brown GK, Campbell A, Earll SA, et al. Addressing risks to advance mental health research. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(12):1363–1371. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Naing L, Winn T, Rusli B N. Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies[J]. Archives of Orofacial Sciences, 2006, 1(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bavindra A, Belavendra A, Sushil K. Sample size estimation in pravalence studies. Indian J Pediatr. 2012,79(11):1482–1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yuan T, Fitzpatrick T,Ko NY, Cai Y, Chen Y, Zhao J, et al. Circumcision to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7 (4):e436–e447. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30567-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Byun HK, Chang JS, Im SH, Kirova YM, Arsene-Henry A, Choi SH, et al. Risk of Lymphedema Following Contemporary Treatment for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 7617 Consecutive Patients From a Multidisciplinary Perspective. Ann Surg. 2021;274(1):170–178. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mcduff S, Mina An I, Brunelle C L, et al. Timing of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: When Are Patients Most At-Risk? International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2018, 103(1):62–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kerlikowske K, Su YR, Sprague BL, Tosteson ANA, Buist DSM, Onega T, et al. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer. JAMA. 2022;327(22):2220–2230. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ford JS, Chou JF, Sklar CA, Oeffinger KC, Novetsky Friedman D, et al. Psychosocial Outcomes in Adult Survivors of Retinoblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(31):3608–3614. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.5733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ibrahim Umar Garzali

2 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-27177

Breast cancer-related lymphedema and recurrence of breast cancer: Protocol for a prospective cohort study in China

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Wu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 19 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ibrahim Umar Garzali, MBBS, FWACS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Our staff editors have determined that your manuscript is likely within the scope of our Early Detection, Screening and Diagnosis of Cancer Call for Papers. This editorial initiative is headed by in-house PLOS editors. This Call for Papers aims to explore recent advances in the early detection of cancer and implications of these advances for patient survival. Additional information can be found on our announcement page: https://collections.plos.org/call-for-papers/early-detection-screening-and-diagnosis-of-cancer/

If you would like your manuscript to be considered for this collection, please let us know in your cover letter and we will ensure that your paper is treated as if you were responding to this call. Please note that being considered for the Call for Papers does not require additional peer review beyond the journal’s standard process and will not delay the publication of your manuscript if it is accepted by PLOS ONE. If you would prefer to remove your manuscript from collection consideration, please specify this in the cover letter.

3. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author “Linli Zhuang”

4. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section: 

“NO authors have competing interests”

Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now

 This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

7. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

8. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 2,3. Radical mastectomy is no longer a standard treatment in breast cancer patients.

-Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire should be placed as an appendix.

-How to measure upper limb volume not clearly mentioned.

-Calculation of sample size should come before the data analysis.

-Some statements should be in future tenses not past tenses.

5.- Introduction not adequately presented the topic and key terms not well defined.

There is need for more literature review.

-Some statements were not well referenced.

-Some part of the introduction should be in discussion not introduction

- There are some grammatical errors.( I have highlighted some of the errors in the PDF manuscript).

-The project context should be in introduction not in the method.

-The referencing should be harmonized to only Vancouver referencing system.

NB: I have highlighted some of the other corrections need to be made in the PDF manuscript I uploaded below.

Reviewer #2: The subject is interesting. However, I've found some potential biases in your protocol. i.e. you've excluded patient with age>55 years. Realistically, older people will have a worse outcome. Furthermore, the risk of depression is higher in elderly. It seems risky to put together several characteristics whose relationship is quite obvious, and amply demonstrated in the Literature.

You highlight the "deep analysis", but it's not clear the way.

Concerning the style, I've noticed that sometimes you use "will" to describe what is foreseen in your protocol, other times "were". It would be better to keep a uniform format.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript needs some grammatical corrections.

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Saminu Muhammad

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Lighlighted for Corrections.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 May 16;18(5):e0285772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285772.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


29 Mar 2023

Dear Dr. Ibrahim

Subject: Submission of revised paper PONE-D-22-27177

Thank you for your email dated 2 Feb 2023 enclosing the reviewers’ comments. We have carefully reviewed the comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly. Our responses are given in a point-by-point manner below. Changes to the manuscript are shown in a separate file labeled “Revised manuscript with Track Changes”.

We hope the revised version is now suitable for publication and look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Sincerely,

Linli Zhuang

West China Hospital

Response to Reviewer: Thank you for your review of our paper. We have answered each of your points below.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Response: Thanks very much for the suggestions from reviewer. Manuscript and file name had been changed according to journal format. We hope the revised version fully meets PLOS ONE's style requirements . Thank you very much.

2.Our staff editors have determined that your manuscript is likely within the scope of our Early Detection, Screening and Diagnosis of Cancer Call for Papers. This editorial initiative is headed by in-house PLOS editors. This Call for Papers aims to explore recent advances in the early detection of cancer and implications of these advances for patient survival. If you would like your manuscript to be considered for this collection, please let us know in your cover letter and we will ensure that your paper is treated as if you were responding to this call. Please note that being considered for the Call for Papers does not require additional peer review beyond the journal’s standard process and will not delay the publication of your manuscript if it is accepted by PLOS ONE. If you would prefer to remove your manuscript from collection consideration, please specify this in the cover letter.

Response: Thank you very much. I am glad to hear our manuscript could be considered for this collection. We added the related information to the cover letter. We believe that early detection, screening and diagnosis of cancer will improve health and quality of life of cancer patients. So, we are glad to responding to this call. Thank you.

3. Please amend the manuscript submission data (via Edit Submission) to include author “Linli Zhuang”

Response: Thank you very much. I have amended the manuscript submission data(via Edit Submission) to include author “Linli Zhuang”. Thank you.

4. Thank you for stating the following in your Competing Interests section:“NO authors have competing interests”. Please complete your Competing Interests on the online submission form to state any Competing Interests. If you have no competing interests, please state "The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.", as detailed online in our guide for authors. This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: Thank you very much. We completed our competing interests on the online submission form accordingly. And we also added the competing interests section in our cover letter. Thank you.

.

5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access. We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

Response: Thank you very much. However, our paper is only a protocol. We have not begun to collect the data yet. Our study is not involved minimal data set at this time. Thanks.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Response: Thank you very much. I have revised the contents of this part. We already included captions for our supporting information files at the end of manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Thanks.

7. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

Response: Thank you very much. Your suggestion pointed out exactly where we had gone wrong I have deleted ethics statement from any other section in our article. Thank you very much.

8. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: Thank you very much. I have added the additional references and checked the reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct (Line 340-431). I have revised the content of this part. Thank you.

9. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics. You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

(1) Reviewer #1: 2,3. Radical mastectomy is no longer a standard treatment in breast cancer patients.

Response: Thank you for your question. Our research is an exploratory clinical research. Different types of breast cancer surgery have varying influences in breast cancer related lymphedema(one of main outcomes). Therefore, other types of breast cancer surgery do not meet the purpose of our research. The participants of research in this study were patients who will suffer radical mastectomy only. Further research is needed to extend the findings to other types of breast cancer surgery. Thank you very much.

(2) Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire should be placed as an appendix.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The Chinese version of Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire was used in this study. I have added Beck Depression Inventory II questionnaire (Chinese version) as an appendix of our study(Line439-440). Thank you very much.

(3)How to measure upper limb volume not clearly mentioned.

Response: Thank you for your question. I am very sorry that this part was not clear in the original manuscripts. The upper-limb volume measurement is based on the international standard measurement method according to 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. We a device commercially known as the Perometer. Its basic operating principle is illustrated in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Illustrating automated optoelectronic measurement of arm circumferences. A limb (arm or leg) is placed within a movable frame that contains infrared light sources that illuminate the limb and allow acquisition of limb projected perpendicular dimensions

Measurement Details and Volume Calculations

A sliding frame with imbedded infrared (IR) light sources scans the arm and the “shadow” dimensions D1 and D2 are detected and used calculate cross-sectional areas as a constant (k) multiplied by D1 and D2. Segment volumes are determined similarly to the manual method with segment volumes summed to produce the arm volume of interest. This method has the advantage of rapidly estimating cross-sectional areas using as low as 0.5 cm segment lengths and an automatic calculation of arm volumes.

We expounded the measurement in the revised manuscripts(Line 150-152). Thank you very much.

(4)Calculation of sample size should come before the data analysis.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We adapted the order in the methods accordingly(Line 216-225). Thank you very much.

(5)Some statements should be in future tenses not past tenses.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have changed the past tense to future tense throughout the document, as appropriate. Thank you very much.

(6)Introduction not adequately presented the topic and key terms not well defined.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. The introduction section has now been enriched(Line 65-93). And we give a more precise definition of key terms. we can learn a lot from you. Thank you.

(7)There is need for more literature review.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We added more literature review to enrich our paper. We believe that more literature review could make our article clear and readable. Thank you very much.

(8)Some statements were not well referenced.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We added references to support the statements. Thank you very much.

(9)Some part of the introduction should be in discussion not introduction

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have moved some contents of introduction to the discussion section(Line 84-93). Thank you very much.

(10)There are some grammatical errors.( I have highlighted some of the errors in the PDF manuscript).

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. You have highlighted the error points in yellow in the PDF manuscript which pointed out exactly where we had gone wrong. I have revised the contents accordingly. we upload revised PDF manuscript as a separate file labeled 'Lighlighted for Corrections(reply version)'. Thank you very much.

(11)The project context should be in introduction not in the method.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have moved project contents of method to the introduction section(Line 84-88). Thank you very much.

(12)-The referencing should be harmonized to only Vancouver referencing system.

NB: I have highlighted some of the other corrections need to be made in the PDF manuscript I uploaded below.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. I have checked the references list to ensure that it is complete and correct. I also have revised all the corrections which you pointed in the PDF manuscript. We reply in full in the revised PDF manuscript. The PDF manuscript with replies was uploaded as supplementary documents. Thank you very much.

(13)Reviewer #2: The subject is interesting. However, I've found some potential biases in your protocol. i.e. you've excluded patient with age>55 years. Realistically, older people will have a worse outcome. Furthermore, the risk of depression is higher in elderly. It seems risky to put together several characteristics whose relationship is quite obvious, and amply demonstrated in the Literature.

Response: Thank you for your question. In clinical studies, older adults are one of vulnerable groups. Vulnerable groups (e.g., children, elderly, people with disability, residents with chronic disease, economically disadvantaged and/or isolated people) should be particularly protected. Our study is an exploratory study. We hope we can draw some conclusions from adults group first.

And then these conclusion will be generalized to other groups. Therefore, our clinical trials protocol did not include vulnerable populations, as patient with age>55 years. And the further study will extends these research results in the population of older adults. Thank you very much.

(14)You highlight the "deep analysis", but it's not clear the way.

Response: Thank you for your question. I am sorry for inaccurate description. The part of this article is an exploratory analysis. Confirmatory analysis is not carried out(Line 260, 262). Thank you very much.

(15)Concerning the style, I've noticed that sometimes you use "will" to describe what is foreseen in your protocol, other times "were". It would be better to keep a uniform format.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have changed the past tense to future tense throughout the document, as appropriate. Thank you very much.

(16)Reviewer #3: The manuscript needs some grammatical corrections.

Response: Thank you for your suggestions. We have corrected the grammatical errors. Thank you very much.

We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in yellow in revised paper.

We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.

Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ibrahim Umar Garzali

2 May 2023

Breast cancer-related lymphedema and recurrence of breast cancer: Protocol for a prospective cohort study in China

PONE-D-22-27177R1

Dear Dr. Wu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ibrahim Umar Garzali, MBBS, FWACS

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Ibrahim Umar Garzali

5 May 2023

PONE-D-22-27177R1

Breast cancer-related lymphedema and recurrence of breast cancer: Protocol for a prospective cohort study in China

Dear Dr. Zhuang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ibrahim Umar Garzali

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Lighlighted for Corrections.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Deidentified research data will be made publicly available when the study is completed and published.

    The data should remain confidential. Only qualified researchers and data analysts can access raw data in our study. All demographic data will be deidentified by allocating numbers to all patients. The datasets that will be used during the study are available on reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author. Dissemination activities will include peer-reviewed publications and international conferences.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES