Table 1.
Effect of 600-HPTChC65 on permeability of [3H]-digoxin across the Caco-2 monolayers.
| Treatment | Papp(AP-to-BL) (× 10−3 cm.min−1) | Papp(BL-to-AP) (× 10−3 cm.min−1) | Efflux ratio (ER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-treated | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 1.41 ± 0.06 | 10.1 ± 0.4 |
| Verapamil 100 µM | 0.34 ± 0.03# | 0.52 ± 0.06# | 1.6 ± 0.1# |
| 600-HPTChC65 0.08% (w/v) | 0.24 ± 0.02* | 1.20 ± 0.05* | 5.2 ± 0.6* |
| 600-HPTChC65 0.16% (w/v) | 0.21 ± 0.02* | 1.14 ± 0.03* | 5.6 ± 0.7* |
| 600-HPTChC65 0.32% (w/v) | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 1.08 ± 0.06* | 5.8 ± 0.5* |
Data are expressed as the apparent permeability coefficient (Papp) and efflux ratio (ER) (mean ± SEM, n = 4). The efflux ratio (ER) is the ratio of Papp(BL-to-AP) to Papp(AP-to-BL).
* and # represent significant difference (p < 0.05), (Student’s t-test for verapamil vs non-treated; one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Dunnett’s test for 600-HPTChC65 vs non-treated).