Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;13:1130680. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1130680

Table 2.

Multivariable competing risks regression analysis after PSM of patients with metastatic prostate cancer, stratified according to treatment type (NLT vs LT).

Variables Local treatment versus no local
treatment
HR (95% CI) p value
Type of treatment
No local therapy Ref.
Radiotherapy 0.77 (0.63-0.95) 0.01
Radical prostatectomy 0.36 (0.29-0.45) <0.001
Age (yr) 1.00 (1.00-1.02) 0.12
Race
White Ref.
African American 0.88 (0.71-1.07) 0.20
Other 0.69 (0.49-0.97) 0.03
Year of diagnosis
2004 Ref.
2005 0.87 (0.59-1.28) 0.47
2006 0.93 (0.62-1.38) 0.72
2007 1.10 (0.73-1.66) 0.65
2008 1.14 (0.78-1.67) 0.51
2009 1.28 (0.87-1.86) 0.21
2010 0.83 (0.47-1.45) 0.51
2011 1.00 (0.58-1.73) 0.99
2012 1.31 (0.69-2.47) 0.41
2013 0.75 (0.41-1.39) 0.36
2014 0.61 (0.34-1.11) 0.11
2015 0.69 (0.38-1.25) 0.22
Gleason score
≤6 Ref.
7 1.42 (0.76-2.68) 0.27
≥8 2.06 (1.12-3.80) 0.02
PSA
≤20 Ref.
>20 1.38 (1.06-1.80) 0.01
AJCC.T
T1-T2 Ref.
T3-T4 1.64 (1.37-1.97) <0.001
AJCC.N
N0 Ref.
N1 1.43 (1.16-1.76) <0.001
AJCC.M
M1a Ref.
M1b 1.90 (1.39-2.58) <0.001
M1c 2.46 (1.76-3.43) <0.001
M1NOS 2.85 (1.66-4.90) <0.001

CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; Ref., reference;

AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer. The meaning of the bold values is p<0.05.