Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;13:1178428. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178428

Table 4.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses for time to PFS.

Characteristics Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
Therapy options (HAIC+T vs. HAIC+T+P) 2.079 (1.382–3.126) <0.001 2.175 (1.438–3.289) <0.001
Age (years) 1.004 (0.985–1.022) 0.702
Sex (male vs. female) 1.155 (0.643–2.073) 0.630
Etiology of HCC and HBV (vs. others) 2.362 (1.310–4.259) 0.004 1.824 (0.981–3.395) 0.058
Child–Pugh score (7–9 vs.5–6) 1.573 (1.027–2.409) 0.037 1.612 (1.044–2.492) 0.031
Cirrhosis (no vs. yes) 0.998 (0.799–1.245) 0.984
BCLC stage (C vs. B) 1.134 (0.753–1.708) 0.546
Portal vein invasion (no vs. yes) 0.977 (0.649–1.473) 0.913
Tumor numbers (≤3 vs. >3) 0.936 (0.433–2.025) 0.867
Largest tumor diameter (per cm) 1.042 (0.988–1.099) 0.127
AFP (ng/ml; ≤400 vs. >400) 0.908 (0.632–1.304) 0.600
Extrahepatic metastases (yes vs. no) 1.136 (0.748–1.723) 0.550
APFs (no vs. yes) 0.536 (0.352–0.814) 0.003 0.546 (0.354–0.841) 0.006

HR, hazards ratio; CI, confidence interval; HAIC, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy; HBV, hepatitis B virus; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; CA199, carbohydrate antigen 199; APFs, arterioportal fistulas.

The bold values denote statistical significance at P < 0.05 level.