Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 7;299(5):104685. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104685

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of nontargeted and targeted proteolytic degradation of Aβ in different fusion formats. Antibody-targeting of C-terminal–fused NEP improves the EC50 value of Aβ(1–40) (top) and Aβ(1–42) (middle) by an average of 15-fold and 9-fold, respectively, compared to nontargeted controls, while the N-terminal fusion format shows no improved activity upon targeting. All targeted formats contain the variable domain of the anti-Aβ antibody crenezumab. Formats of the same enzyme and Fab valency and enzyme fusion site are compared in each plot along with enzyme alone. The key shows the EC50 values and visually depicts the targeted and nontargeted formats. Error bars represent standard error values with n = 2. Aβ, amyloid-β; CTF, C-terminal fusion; Fc, fragment crystallizable; IgG: immunoglobulin G; NEP, neprolysin; NTF, N-terminal fusion; scIgG, monovalent single-chain immunoglobulin G.