ABSTRACT
Review of vaginal isolates of Candida albicans that caused clinical failure in a 10-year collection of vaginal C. albicans specimens obtained in a university vaginitis referral clinic indicated an increase in fluconazole resistance. Factors contributing to azole resistance are discussed, including treatment choice associated with fluconazole-resistant C. albicans vaginal infection.
KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, fluconazole, resistance, vaginitis
INTRODUCTION
The global emergence of antifungal drug resistance among fungal genera is of growing concern (1–5). Resistance in Candida species is attracting attention, especially in invasive Candida infections by Candida auris (6). Less attention has been directed at clinically resistant, often-refractory Candida vaginitis (VVC), which is responsible for considerable suffering in women. Resistance to fluconazole is widely recognized in Candida krusei and Candida glabrata; however, problematic vaginitis due to Candida albicans has escaped attention, with few epidemiologic studies (5–7). Reports include a growing clinical problem of fluconazole resistance, especially in women with recurrent VVC (RVVC) (8–14). The present manuscript reports a single-site, large longitudinal study of fluconazole-resistant VVC caused by C. albicans over a 10-year period.
The Vulvovaginitis Clinic of Wayne State University in Detroit sees approximately 1,200 patients per year, including 300 new referrals. Antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) are only performed when requested by a single practitioner (J.D.S.), when antifungal drug resistance is suspected because of either refractory clinical disease suggested by continuing acute patient symptoms and positive microscopy in spite of appropriate antifungal therapy or breakthrough symptomatic VVC while receiving maintenance prophylactic fluconazole therapy.
AST methodology included determination of MICs using broth dilution according to the CLSI M27ed4 method (15–17). MICs were read at 24 h. ATCC strains of C. parapsilosis (22,019) and C. krusei (6,258) were used as quality controls. It has been the local laboratory practice for several years to determine the MIC at pH 7.0 and 4.5 (18). Clinical breakpoint standards to determine susceptibility at pH 7.0 are based upon CLSI recommendations, with the resistant level being ≥8 μg/mL, susceptible dose dependent (SDD) level at 4 μg/mL, and susceptible level at ≤2 μg/mL, with identical breakpoint values extrapolated to pH 4.5.
Results of all C. albicans susceptibility tests performed over 10 years (2012 to 2021) are shown in Table 1. Each year, approximately 1,000 vaginal cultures were obtained, of which approximately 20% were positive for Candida and other yeast species. Of the isolates collected, 1,578 (76.3%) were positive for C. albicans. Susceptibility testing was performed on 193 (12.2%) C. albicans isolates based upon practitioner request. Fluconazole resistance at pH 7.0 was observed in 44 (23%) isolates. Forty isolates were defined as SDD, with a MIC estimation of 4 μg/mL (21%), and 109 (56%) isolates were determined to be susceptible (MIC, ≤2 μg/mL). The percentage of fluconazole-resistant C. albicans isolates varied by year (Table 1), with a dramatic increase in fluconazole resistance detected in 2021. Results indicated that while the number of patients seen and examined remained fairly constant (except for COVID pandemic years 2020 and 2021), the number of patients with clinically suspected resistance increased, together with an increase in the number of patients with fluconazole-resistant C. albicans.
TABLE 1.
Antifungal susceptibility studies, 2012 to 2021
| Yr | No. of total cultures | No. (%) positive for any yeast | No. (%) positive for C. albicans | No. with AST result | No. (%) of isolates resistant to fluconazole (MIC ≥ 8 μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1,202 | 201 (16.7) | 155 (77.1) | 14 | 4 (28.6) |
| 2013 | 1,132 | 215 (19.0) | 157 (73.0) | 22 | 5 (22.7) |
| 2014 | 1,069 | 195 (18.2) | 147 (75.3) | 19 | 3 (15.8) |
| 2015 | 1,177 | 247 (21.0) | 192 (77.7) | 23 | 4 (17.4) |
| 2016 | 1,092 | 213 (19.5) | 153 (71.8) | 19 | 2 (10.5) |
| 2017 | 1,044 | 246 (23.6) | 191 (77.6) | 21 | 7 (33.3) |
| 2018 | 961 | 204 (21.2) | 165 (80.8) | 18 | 3 (16.6) |
| 2019 | 1,027 | 233 (22.6) | 171 (73.4) | 18 | 3 (16.6) |
| 2020 | 667 | 127 (19.0) | 102 (80.3) | 11 | 3 (27.3) |
| 2021 | 933 | 186 (19.9) | 145 (77.9) | 28 | 10 (35.7) |
| Total | 10,304 | 2,067 (20.1) | 1,578 (76.3) | 193 | 44 (22.8) |
Comparison of AST results obtained over the last 4 years (n = 65) and performed at both pH 7.0 and 4.5 in C. albicans isolates further revealed a dramatic increase in C. albicans fluconazole resistance at pH 4.5, from 20% to 52% (Table 2). Most change in status occurred for isolates for which MICs were previously determined at pH 7.0 and the classification was SDD (4 μg/mL). Overall resistance frequency at pH 4.5 more closely correlated with the original clinical suspicion of resistance, with only 32% of C. albicans isolates deemed susceptible to fluconazole.
TABLE 2.
Comparison of ASTs analyzed by pH of median (2018 to 2021)
| Susceptibility category | % vaginal C. albicans isolates in category when tested at: |
|
|---|---|---|
| pH 7.0 | pH 4.5 | |
| Susceptible (MIC ≤ 2 μg/mL) | 52% | 38% |
| Sensitive dose dependent (MIC 4 μg/mL) | 23% | 10% |
| Resistant (MIC ≥ 8 μg/mL) | 25% | 52% |
This report reflects the experience in a single center only, with acknowledged accrual bias, and does not measure the overall prevalence of resistance in C. albicans causing VVC in the region. The true prevalence of fluconazole resistance both locally and worldwide is largely unknown (14, 19, 20). Unfortunately, reports in the literature of antifungal drug susceptibility of C. albicans causing VVC are compromised by difficulties based upon highly variable patient characteristics, yeast as commensal or pathogens, susceptibility test variables, broth dilution versus disc measurement, or commercial test methods. Overall estimates of in vitro fluconazole resistance in C. albicans vaginal isolates in general is below 5%, and as indicated in the present study, was 3% of total C. albicans isolates but 20% of tested isolates at pH 7.0 and 52% at pH 4.5, supporting the recommendation for suspecting resistance in women with clinical suspicion of fluconazole therapy failure (Table 2) (8, 14). In some geographic areas, considerably higher levels of fluconazole resistance of >20% have been reported in unselected isolates (21).
The present review describes a considerable number of symptomatic women with refractory and recurrent VVC caused by fluconazole-resistant C. albicans, whereas at the same time there have been no reports of increased azole resistance in blood isolates or of invasive candidiasis due to C. albicans (2, 3, 19). The differences between blood and vaginal isolates of C. albicans are numerous, including duration of fluconazole exposure, days in patients with candidemia and weeks and months in RVVC patients, analogous to patients with untreated HIV immunodeficiency in whom C. albicans fluconazole resistance was first reported (22). Repeated short courses of inexpensive fluconazole are also encouraged by practitioners.
The implications of refractory vaginitis caused by fluconazole-resistant C. albicans are legion, with chronic and often severe vulvovaginal symptoms aggravated by the paucity of alternative therapeutic options (23). Physicians are largely unaware of drug resistance in vaginal yeast infections, except with non-albicans Candida species. New antifungals oteseconazole and ibrexafungerp are now available, with in vitro data indicating potent activity against azole-resistant Candida species (24, 25). However, there are few data of clinical efficacy against fluconazole-resistant organisms in infected patients. The new agents are contraindicated in pregnancy, with other use restrictions.
Breakpoints used universally are based upon extrapolation of values derived from studies only in invasive candidiasis. Pharmacokinetics, especially fluconazole vaginal tissue concentrations and the vaginal pH circumstances, are capable of influencing breakpoint values applied in VVC. Considerable experience utilizing simultaneous in vitro testing at both pH 7.0 and pH 4.5 indicates that C. albicans isolates determined to have a MIC of 4 μg/mL at pH 7.0 frequently demonstrate an increased fluconazole MIC of ≥8 μg/mL when tested at pH 4.5 and that failure to test vaginal isolates at the lower pH results in underestimation of clinically relevant drug resistance (26–30).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The manuscript was prepared without external funding. No conflict of interest is recognized.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hendrickson JA, Hu C, Aitken SL, Beyda N. 2019. Antifungal resistance: a concerning trend for the present and future. Curr Infect Dis Rep 21:47. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0702-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ford CB, Funt JM, Abbey D, Issi L, Guiducci C, Martinez DA, Delorey T, Li BY, White TC, Cuomo C, Rao RP, Berman J, Thompson DA, Regev A. 2015. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Elife 4:e00662. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lamoth F, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. 2020. Role and Interpretation of antifungal susceptibility testing for the management of invasive fungal infections. J Fungi (Basel) 7:17. doi: 10.3390/jof7010017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sanglard D. 2016. Emerging threats in antifungal-resistant fungal pathogens. Front Med (Lausanne) 3:11. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2016.00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. 2016. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida species. Front Microbiol 7:2173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spivak ES, Hanson KE. 2018. Candida auris: an emerging fungal pathogen. J Clin Microbiol 56:e01588-17. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01588-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rigo GV, Tasca T. 2020. Vaginitis: review on drug resistance. Curr Drug Targets 21:1672–1686. doi: 10.2174/1389450121666200804112340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Marchaim D, Lemanek L, Bheemreddy S, Kaye KS, Sobel JD. 2012. Fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans vulvovaginitis. Obstet Gynecol 120:1407–1414. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31827307b2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mohammadi F, Hemmat N, Bajalan Z, Javadi A. 2021. Analysis of biofilm-related genes and antifungal susceptibility pattern of vaginal Candida albicans and non-Candida albicans species. Biomed Res Int 2021:5598907. doi: 10.1155/2021/5598907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Agrawal P, Yazdy G, Ghanem KG, Handa VL, Schumacher CM, Sobel JD, Zhang SX, Tuddenham S. 2023. Vaginal Candida albicans: high frequency of in vitro fluconazole resistance in a select population. Sex Transm Dis 50:121–123. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sobel JD. 2016. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 214:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Collins LM, Moore R, Sobel JD. 2020. Prognosis and long-term outcome of women with idiopathic recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by Candida albicans. J Low Genit Tract Dis 24:48–52. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Arechavala A, Negroni R, Santiso G, Depardo R, Bonvehí P. 2021. Chronic recurrent vulvovaginitis is not only due to Candida. Rev Iberoam Micol 38:132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2021.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berkow EL, Lockhart SR. 2017. Fluconazole resistance in Candida species: a current perspective. Infect Drug Resist 10:237–245. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S118892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Berkow EL, Lockhart SR, Ostrosky-Zeichner L. 2020. Antifungal susceptibility testing: current approaches. Clin Microbiol Rev 33:e00069-19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00069-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wiederhold NP. 2021. Antifungal susceptibility testing: a primer for clinicians. Open Forum Infect Dis 8:ofab444. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Arendrup MC, Friberg N, Mares M, Kahlmeter G, Meletiadis J, Guinea J, Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing (AFST) of the ESCMID European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) . 2020. How to interpret MICs of antifungal compounds according to the revised clinical breakpoints v. 10.0 European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST). Clin Microbiol Infect 26:1464–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sobel JD, Akins R. 2022. Determining susceptibility in Candida vaginal isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0236621. doi: 10.1128/aac.02366-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bassetti M, Vena A, Bouza E, Peghin M, Muñoz P, Righi E, Pea F, Lackner M, Lass-Flörl C. 2020. Antifungal susceptibility testing in Candida, Aspergillus and Cryptococcus infections: are the MICs useful for clinicians? Clin Microbiol Infect 26:1024–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dharmik PG, Gomashe AV, Upadhyay VG. 2013. Susceptibility pattern of various azoles against Candida species causing vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Obstet Gynaecol India 63:135–137. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0280-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tang Y, Yu F, Huang L, Hu Z. 2019. The changes of antifungal susceptibilities caused by the phenotypic switching of Candida species in 229 patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. J Clin Lab Anal 33:e22644. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tumbarello M, Tacconelli E, Caldarola G, Morace G, Cauda R, Ortona L. 1997. Fluconazole resistant oral candidiasis in HIV-infected patients. Oral Dis 3(Suppl 1):S110–S112. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1997.tb00337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sobel JD, Sobel R. 2018. Current treatment options for vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by azole-resistant Candida species. Expert Opin Pharmacother 19:971–977. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Barnes KN, Yancey AM, Forinash AB. 2023. Ibrexafungerp in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Ann Pharmacother 57:99–106. doi: 10.1177/10600280221091301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sobel JD, Nyirjesy P. 2021. Oteseconazole: an advance in treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Future Microbiol 16:1453–1461. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2021-0173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Spitzer M, Wiederhold NP. 2018. Reduced antifungal susceptibility of vulvovaginal Candida species at normal vaginal pH levels: clinical implications. J Low Genit Tract Dis 22:152–158. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu W, Zhang X, Liu Z, Luo X. 2011. Impact of pH on the antifungal susceptibility of vaginal Candida albicans. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 114:278–280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Danby CS, Boikov D, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Sobel JD. 2012. Effect of pH on in vitro susceptibility of Candida glabrata and Candida albicans to 11 antifungal agents and implications for clinical use. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:1403–1406. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05025-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marr KA, Rustad TR, Rex JH, White TC. 1999. The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:1383–1386. doi: 10.1128/AAC.43.6.1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sobel JD. 2023. Role of antifungal susceptibility tests in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 25:29–32. doi: 10.1007/s11908-023-00797-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
