Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 10;30(5):594–599. doi: 10.1038/s41594-023-00947-3

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

Noc1–Noc2 RNP (EMD-27919), (PDB 8E5T) Noc2–Noc3 RNP (EMD-27910)
Data collection and processing
Magnification ×22,500 ×22,500
Voltage (kV) 300 300
Electron exposure (e2) 37.9 37.9
Defocus range (μm) −1.0 to −3.0 −1.5 to −3.0
Pixel size (Å) 1.3 1.3
Symmetry imposed C1 C1
Initial particle images (no.) 977,232 669,811
Final particle images (no.) 158,915 75,358
Map resolution (Å) 4.0 3.69
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 2.8–11.5 2.8–8.5
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) 6C0F
Model resolution (Å) 3.7
 FSC threshold 0.143
Model resolution range (Å) (FSC 0,0.143,0.5) Masked 3.6/3.7/7.0
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −44.7
Model composition
 Non-hydrogen atoms 55,125
 Protein residues 5158
 Nucleic acid 968
 Ligand Zn-1, Mg-33
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 83.71/491.41/148.87
 Ligand 51.94/257.32/115.29
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.004 (0)
 Bond angles (°) 0.927 (5)
Validation
 MolProbity score 1.44
 Clashscore 3.96
 Poor rotamers (%) 0
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 96.21
 Allowed (%) 3.69
 Disallowed (%) 0.10