Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 20.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2023 Mar 4;42(11):1699–1721. doi: 10.1002/sim.9695

TABLE 2.

Rosiglitazone example: (a) a summary of FlexB estimates for myocardial infrarction (MI) and cardiovascular death (CVD); (b) comparison of different methods in estimating θ0 and τ2 for MI and CVD.

MI CVD
Mean SE Median 95% C.I. Mean SE Median 95% C.I.
θ 0 0.247 0.147 0.241 (−0.054,0.579) 0.160 0.232 0.144 (−0.342,0.687)
τ 2 0.058 0.075 0.033 (0.001,0.201) 0.117 0.188 0.052 (0.002,0.454)
μ 0 −5.761 0.224 −5.754 (−6.225,−5.336) −6.633 0.307 −6.612 (−7.280,−6.087)
σ 2 1.008 0.325 0.957 (0.454,1.543) 1.535 0.623 1.429 (0.547,2.860)
(a)
θ 0 τ 2
MI p-value CVD p-value MI CVD
SA 0.030 0.446 −0.063 0.395 DSL 0 0
DSL 0.295 0.006 0.118 0.184 DSK 0 0
EL 0.159 0.081 −0.059 0.325 PM 0 0
MH 0.250 0.015 0.026 0.422 IPM 0 0
MUE 0.071 0.268 −0.032 0.402 GLMM 0 0
GLMM 0.226 0.061 0.007 0.962 BAYES 0.042 0.024
SGSwgt 0.248 0.016 0.036 0.391 FlexB 0.033 0.052
BAYES 0.175 * 0.137 *
HTE-Beta 0.220 * 0.297 *
FlexB 0.247 * 0.160 *
(b)