Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 20;26(5):106705. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106705

Table 3.

Detailed parameter comparison between HM20 method and HM20-T method

Method Hardness Embedding time (dehydration/penetration/polymerization) Cutting thickness Fluorescent protein/probe Immunochemical staining
HM20 80 HD 10 h/51 h/20 h 1 μm YFP/GFP __
HM20-T 86 HD 10 h/51 h/48 h 1 μm YFP/GFP/tdTomato/mRuby/LEL-DyLight488/DANIR-8C/Fluoro-Gold Compatibility