Skip to main content
. 2023 May 17;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00570-z

Table 1.

EAP: comparison among the major European Countries

EAP France Italy Spain UK
General Label Early access (ex-ATU and ex-PEC-T) + Others Early access and off-label use Availability of medicines under special circumstances EAMS (Early Access to Medicine Schemes)
Regulatory reference LOI n° 2020-1576 du 14 décembre 2020 de financement de la sécurité sociale pour 2021 648 List: Law 648/96, Law 79/2014, Decreto 2/8/2019 5% Fund: Law 326/03 Royal Decree 1015/2009 (under review) No regulatory references so far
Named/Cohort Named or cohort depending on the program

648 List: cohort

5% Fund: named

Named Both: named/cohort
Coverage Before the completion of the P&R process Before MA Foreign medicines: after MA Off-label: no MA Only before MA
Process
Applicant Industry/physicians—hospitals

648 List: Patients Associations, Scientific Societies, Health Care Organization, Universities, Clinicians

5% Fund: Health Care Organization (specialised centres), Clinicians

Physicians/hospitals Industry/physicians—hospitals
Approval ANSM (safety and efficacy) HAS (other selection criteria) AIFA (CTS) AEMPS; Regional authorities (in special occasions for expensive drugs) MHRA
Payers of medicines Hospitals (after receiving an internal permit) But companies could provide medicine for free

648 List: Regions

5% Fund: AIFA through 5% Fund fed by the pharma industry

Hospitals via Regions/industries (most compassionate use cases) Industries (for this reason is not an EAP as we intend)
Selection criteria
Target diseases Severe, rare or disabling diseases, no alternatives,

648 List: Different types of disease

5% Fund: rare diseases and particular/severe diseases

Severe diseases, no alternatives Severe and disabling disease, high unmet need
Medicines New drugs/ indications in development, off-label drugs, foreign medicines

648 List: No valid alternatives; cheaper than valid alternatives

5% Fund: Orphans drug/drugs in development not approved yet, which represent "a hope of therapy"

Off-label medicines, Foreign medicines New Drugs, products already marketed in the UK for other indications (off-label), foreign medicines
Evidence Safety, efficacy (based on the results of clinical trials) and presumed to be innovative

648 List: Phase II/Data that may support their use (pure 'off-label')

5% Fund: Clinical report

Safety and efficacy Safety and efficacy and presumed to be innovative
Data collection Yes (well structured). PUT -RD (patient characteristics, medicine usage, efficacy, quality of life (PROMs etc.…), adverse events

648 List: in principle data on efficacy and safety profile (from the regions to AIFA) Data are not available

5% Fund: No

Yes. Physicians have to collect data on adverse events/ AEMPS has no obbligation to collect data, but may collect them No evidence on data availability
Data on economic impact No Yes (but only for the 5% Fund) No No
Dedicated Fund No Only for 5% Fund No No
MEA Financial-based agreements (volumes caps/payback if the awarded price < price charged through early access programs) No, except in 648 List where they are rarely applied No No
Impact on P&R Data collection influences ASMR’ evaluation and, therefore, the price of the drug 648 List (revenue from 648 are considered in the P&R negotiation) No No
Fee No No No Yes
Limited duration time and, if any, renewal rules Duration of early access cannot exceed 1 year. It can be renewed with updated product information. If the HAS opinion is negative, the company is obliged to provide patients with treatment for 1 year before stopping supply No No Scientific opinion could be renewed at least 2 months before expiry