Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285762

Interval walking training in type 2 diabetes: A pilot study to evaluate the applicability as exercise therapy

Kouhei Kitajima 1, Ako Oiwa 1,*, Takahiro Miyakoshi 1, Manami Hosokawa 1, Mayuka Furihata 2, Masaaki Takahashi 3, Shizue Masuki 2, Hiroshi Nose 2, Yosuke Okubo 1, Ai Sato 1, Masanori Yamazaki 1, Mitsuhisa Komatsu 1
Editor: Jennifer Annette Campbell4
PMCID: PMC10194951  PMID: 37200321

Abstract

There are few established easy-to-perform exercise protocols with evidence-based effects for individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A unique exercise regimen, interval walking training (IWT), has been reported to be beneficial for improving metabolic function, physical fitness and muscle strength in adults of overall health. This pilot study aims to demonstrate descriptive statistics of IWT adherence and changes in various data before and after the intervention of IWT in adults with T2D, perform statistical hypothesis testing, and calculate effect sizes. We performed a single-arm interventional pilot study with IWT for 20 weeks. We enrolled 51 participants with T2D aged 20–80 years with glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 6.5–10.0% (48–86 mmol/mol) and a body mass index of 20–34 kg/m2, respectively. The target was 60 min/week of fast walking for 20 weeks. The participants visited the hospital and were examined at 4-week intervals during this period. Between the start of IWT and after 20 weeks, we measured and evaluated changes in glucose and lipid metabolism data, body composition, physical fitness, muscle strength, dietary calorie intake, and daily exercise calories. All included participants completed IWT, with 39% of them reaching the target length of fast walking over 1,200 minutes in 20 weeks. In the primary outcome, HbA1c levels, and in the secondary, lipid metabolism and body composition, no significant changes were observed except for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (from 1.4 mmol/L to 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.0093, t-test). However, in the target achievement group, a significant increase in VO2 peak by 10% (from 1,682 mL/min to 1,827 mL/min, p = 0.037, t-test) was observed. Effect sizes were Cohen’s d = 0.25 of HDL-C, -0.55 of triglyceride, and 0.24 of VO2 peak in the target achievement group, which were considered to be of small to medium clinical significance. These results could be solely attributed to IWT since there were no significant differences in dietary intake and daily life energy consumption before and after the study. IWT could be highly versatile and was suggested to have a positive effect on lipid metabolism and physical fitness. In future randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, the detailed effects of IWT, focusing on these parameters, will be examined.

Trial registration: This trial was registered with the Japanese University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR: Usefulness on interval walking training in patients with type 2 diabetes. 000037303).

Introduction

The International Diabetes Federation estimated 450 million people with diabetes worldwide in 2019 [1]. Exercise therapy and diet therapy form the basis of diabetes treatment and are required for most people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In recent years, combined aerobic and resistance exercises have reportedly enhanced muscle mass and strength, resulting in improved insulin resistance and more effective glycemic control [24] compared to aerobic exercise alone [5]. Accordingly, there are worldwide recommendations for performing both aerobic and resistance exercises [6].

On the other hand, there is a low uptake of exercise, with 60% of adults with T2D not exercising at all [7]. This low practice rate could be attributed to low motivation, limited time availability, management problems, and lack of willpower or control [8]. Another reason for the low exercise uptake among people with T2D could be difficulty on the part of medical professional to teach positive habits, given the few established easy-to-perform protocols with evidence-based effects [9].

The Department of Sports Medical Sciences, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine, developed a unique walking method termed interval walking training (IWT) in 1999. Interval walking involves repeating fast walking at ≥ 70% of the individual peak aerobic capacity (VO2 peak) and slow walking at ≤ 40% VO2 peak alternately for 3 minutes. Target exercise amounts are ≥ 60 minutes per week of fast walking time, which means 5–10 sets of 3 minutes of fast walking and 3 minutes of the slow walking a day for ≥ 4 days. This was determined by the effect of increasing VO2 peak almost plateaued at 50 minutes per week [10]. Further, the aforementioned department also developed a triaxial accelerometer called JD Mate (Kissei Comtec, Matsumoto, Japan) that can easily estimate VO2 peak [11]. Details of the IWT are published elsewhere [12, 13]. There has been active research and development of IWT, with approximately 8,700 individuals of overall good health participating in these studies [13, 14]. Despite walking being a simple exercise, IWT improves metabolic function, physical fitness and muscle strength, indicating that it combines aerobic and resistance exercises. There is a plethora of scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of IWT, with increasing worldwide attention [10, 12, 13, 1517].

Currently, only one study has investigated IWT using JD Mate in persons with T2D; compared with continuous walking, IWT improved physical fitness, body composition, and glycemic control [18]. However, because the basis for the number of cases required for statistical analysis in this study is unclear, it is difficult to accurately judge the effect of IWT on patients with T2D from this study alone. In addition, the participants were limited to a small number who could strictly follow the protocol, which rendered it insufficient to determine the general and pragmatic efficacy of IWT for T2D.

This single-arm intervention study plays an exploratory role in accurately assessing the practical effectiveness of IWT with T2D.

Materials and methods

The protocol for this research project has been approved by the institution’s suitably constituted Ethics Committee. It conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

The clinical study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Shinshu University School of Medicine (No.4374). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before participation. This trial was registered in the Japanese University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR: Usefulness on interval walking training in patients with T2D. UMIN 000037303).

Research design

This single-arm interventional study was conducted from July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2020. Results from the study are reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials: CONSORT. The flow of participants is presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Flow chart of the progress through the phases of the study.

Fig 1

This is a single-arm interventional study. All participants received the intervention, and their data were analyzed.

Fig 2 shows a flow chart that simplifies this study method. Participants performed IWT for 20 weeks. The target fast walking time was set to ≥ 60 minutes per week, which means 5–10 sets of 3 minutes of fast walking and 3 minutes of slow walking a day for ≥ 4 days. The target fast walking time was set to ≥ 60 minutes per week due to the report that the effect of increasing VO2 peak almost plateaued at 50 minutes per week [10]. Moreover, the reason for the setting of 20 weeks is that we have found that physical fitness improvement with IWT occurs after 20 weeks of intervention (12), and physical fitness increases by 10–15% in the first 20 weeks and then maintains it with continued IWT (13). We have set the primary outcome as a change in HbA1c levels, and the secondary outcome as a change in body composition, physical fitness, muscle strength, dietary calorie intake, and daily exercise calories, before and after IWT.

Fig 2. Flow chart of this research method.

Fig 2

Fifty-one participants met all inclusion criteria and none were excluded. Both before starting and after IWT, participants underwent laboratory tests and imaging tests (computed tomography (CT) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) and were measured for muscle strength and VO2 peak. Flash glucose monitoring (FreeStyle Libre pro, ABBOTT Japan Inc. Chiba, Japan, FGM), brief self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ), and calculation of basal physical activity energy expenditure examination were performed both for 1 to 2 weeks before the study and for 1 to 2 weeks from the 18th week of the study. The total study period was 20 weeks, and the participants visited the hospital and were examined at 4-week intervals during the period. BMI, body mass index; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; IWT, interval walking training; FGM, flash glucose monitoring; BDHQ, brief self-administered diet history questionnaire.

Participants

Recruitment of participants included all outpatients who visited the Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Shinshu University Hospital, from July 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019, and met all the inclusion criteria; none of them were excluded. The inclusion criteria were having T2D; age: 20–80 years; HbA1c: 6.5–10.0% (48–86 mmol/mol); body mass index (BMI): 20–34 kg/m2, and capability to perform exercise therapy as per the exercise regimen. In addition, we excluded persons with pre-proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy with albuminuria (≥300 mg/gCre), or an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated by serum creatinine, history of coronary artery disease or stroke, pregnant or lactating women, and cases judged by the doctors as inappropriate.

Outcome measures

Changes in the following parameters were measured and evaluated between the start of IWT and after 20 weeks.

Laboratory tests: HbA1c, plasma glucose levels, plasma C peptide, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglyceride, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, urinary albumin excretion.

Imaging tests: MRI-quantified plasma liver fat mass, CT-quantified abdominal visceral fat mass and thigh muscle mass.

Physical fitness tests: Thigh muscle strength measured using a dynamometer (Biodex 3, Biodex Medical System, Shirley, NY, USA), VO2 peak (maximum) using JD Mate.

Other parameters: BMI, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, prescription, frequency of interval walking, target achievement rate, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) measured using FGM, dietary calorie intake using BDHQ and recorded daily exercise calories burned using JD Mate.

Intervention protocol

A schematic of the intervention protocol is shown in Fig 2.

Before starting IWT, background characteristics (family history, drinking, smoking, and exercise habits) were collected using a questionnaire; the participants underwent abdominal and thigh plain CT and abdominal MRI. Moreover, we measured the VO2 peak and lower limb muscle strength following the physical fitness measurement protocol at the Jukunen Taiikudaigaku Research Center (JTRC) [10]. Further, a FGM device was worn for two weeks before starting IWT. The dietary survey undergone with BDHQ [19], and calories burned in daily life for one week were measured using JD Mate. These parameters were collected as pre-IWT data.

On the day of starting IWT, the participants underwent a medical examination; blood samples were collected for biochemical analysis.

During the study, the participants visited the hospital and were examined at 4-week intervals. Training records obtained using JD Mate were transferred to the central server computer via the Internet. Each participant received an evaluation of the previous 2-week training data at each visit, encouraging them to continue IWT. The aforementioned remote individual exercise prescription system was also developed by the Department of Sports of Medical Sciences, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine [14]. The doctor conducted a questionnaire survey regarding the presence and degree of trauma, upper and lower limb joint pain, and back pain from the start to each visit.

In the 18th week of the study, the participants wore a FGM device for two weeks and underwent a dietary survey using the BDHQ. Moreover, we measured the calories burned in daily life using JD Mate for one week. These parameters were collected as post-IWT data.

At the end of the intervention, weight, height, blood pressure, and biochemical data were recorded.

Within two months of the end of the study period, the participants underwent VO2 peak measurement, muscle strength measurement, abdominal and thigh plain CT, and plain abdominal MRI as before the study. The participants continued the IWT until these examinations were fully completed.

Biochemical data

Venous blood samples were collected on the first and last visits. HbA1c levels were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography, while blood C-peptide levels and IRI were measured using an enzyme immunoassay (Tosoh Corp., Tokyo, Japan). HDL and LDL cholesterol levels were measured using the homogenous method (Sekisui Medical Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Triglyceride levels were measured using the glycerol elimination method. BUN levels were measured using a urease UV method kit (Quick-Auto Neo UN) (Shino-Test Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Serum creatinine levels were enzymatically measured (Sinotest Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Urine albumin levels were measured using immunoturbidity (Fuji Film Corp., Osaka, Japan). Blood glucose, blood C-peptide, IRI, and triglyceride levels were measured at any time, not requiring fasting.

MAGE measurement

An FGM device (FreeStyle Libre Pro) was worn for two weeks at the beginning of the study and two weeks from the 18th week of the study. MAGE [20], an index of the average blood glucose fluctuation exceeding one standard deviation, was calculated from the data.

Image inspection

The MRI-derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) measured liver fat content. To eliminate the effects of cardiac and intestinal peristaltic motion artifact, we placed two regions of interest in the peripheral areas of the right anterior lobe and the right posterior lobe of the liver [21]. Moreover, the average values were compared before and after the intervention. Compared with liver biopsy, MRI-PDFF measurement is stable and highly reproducible [22, 23]. Visceral and subcutaneous fat volume was measured at the level of the umbilicus line using plain CT [24]; furthermore, muscle mass was measured using plain CT at the center of the right thigh [25].

Muscle strength measurement

We measured the extension and flexion force of both knees using a dynamometer and calculated the average value for each knee.

Physical fitness test

Maximum physical fitness (VO2 peak) was measured using a JD mate. The participants were asked to gather at the gymnasium and wear the JD mate on their waists. With encouragement from a JTRC trainer, the participants walked at gradually increasing speeds (3 graded subjective velocities: low, medium, and high speed; 3 minutes for each speed) and finally at the fastest walking speeds. Within 30s of the last fastest walking, energy consumption was defined as the maximum physical strength (VO2 peak). The maximal oxygen uptake (liter/min, y) determined using this method has good agreement with the value (x) measured using a bicycle ergometer (y = 1.1x – 0.16, r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) [13].

Daily calorie intake and consumption survey

The BDHQ [19], a questionnaire that estimates energy intake by asking consumption details for 58 foods and beverages, was used to conduct dietary surveys to estimate dietary calorie intake. This dietary survey method has little seasonal variation in estimating energy intake [26]. Daily calorie consumption was calculated using JD Mate. The time-weighted average of energy expenditure by daily basal physical activity was calculated by adding all numbers derived by the following formula: (each measurement time / total measurement time) × calorie burned corresponding to each measurement time. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Sample size

Since this study is a prospective, single-arm pilot study, this study aims to demonstrate descriptive statistics of IWT adherence and changes in various data before and after the intervention of IWT. Therefore, we did not calculate the sample size setting by power analysis, as our primary goal was not to perform hypothesis testing. Regarding feasibility, 70 participants were recruited, and 51 were finally registered.

Statistical analyses

Baseline clinical characteristics are expressed as the mean with standard deviation and percentages. Continuous variables are expressed as the mean with standard deviation. Changes in outcome variables after 20 weeks were assessed using a paired t-test and described as differences (pre IWT–post IWT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Since the number of samples was sufficiently large (n = 51), the t-test was used due to the central limit theorem [27]. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software R version 4.0.2 (2020-06-22) (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The effect size was calculated using Cohen’s d. An effect size of >|0.2| is considered small, >|0.5| is medium, and >|0.8| is large [28].

Results

Baseline characteristics of the participants

Table 1 shows the participant characteristics. We included 51 adults with T2D (29 persons, 56.9% men). The mean age and BMI were 62.3 ± 11.5 years and 27.1 ± 3.7 kg/m2, respectively. Only 22% of the participants had regular exercise habits; further, 68.6% of participants had hypertension, and a similar proportion had dyslipidemia. Additionally, 66.7% of the participants had urinary albumin excretion < 30 mg/g of creatinine. Metformin showed the highest usage rate (62.7%) among oral hypoglycemic agents, followed by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, sulfonylureas, and insulin.

Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics of all participants.

Age, mean (SD) 63.0 (11.5)
BMI, mean (SD) 27.1 (3.7)
Male, n (%) 29 (56.9)
Alcohol drinking, n (%) a 35 (68.8)
Smoking, n (%) b 2 (3.9)
Daily exercise habits, n (%) c 11 (22.0)
Diabetes family history, n (%) d 35 (68.6)
Hypertension, n (%) 35 (68.6)
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 35 (68.6)
Treatment: Drug usage rate, n (%)
Insulin injection 14 (27.5)
Metformin 32 (62.7)
Sulfonylurea 18 (35.3)
DPP4inhibitor 27 (52.9)
SGLT2 inhibitor 21 (41.2)
GLP-1 analogue 14 (27.5)
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitor 10 (19.6)
Glinide 4 (7.8)
Pioglitazone 1 (2.0)
Nephropathy, n (%)
U-Alb < 30 mg/gCre 34 (66.7)
U-Alb ≥ 30 mg/gCre 17 (33.3)

a: Including occasional drinking

b: Including past smoking history

c: Exercise for ≥ 30 minutes at least twice a week and continued for ≥ 1 year

d: Presence of diabetic relatives within the second degree.

BMI, body mass index; DPP4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; SGLT2, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2: U-Alb, urine albumin; Cre, creatinine.

Adherence to fast walking time

Fig 3 shows distribution of the fast-walking time and the number of people. The median total fast walking time was 1,022 minutes. Since the weekly target was 60 minutes of fast walking [10], participants with fast walking times > 1,200 minutes at 20 weeks (n = 20 [39%]; 12 men and eight women) were classified as the achievement group. Nevertheless, all 51 participants completed IWT for five months to the extent of their abilities.

Fig 3. Distribution of the fast-walking time and the number of people.

Fig 3

Each participant’s total fast walking time was divided into sections of 300 min, with the number of participants in each section being shown. The target fast walking time was > 60 minutes per week; accordingly, participants who achieved > 1,200 minutes in fast walking time during the total study period (20 weeks) were defined as the achievement group.

Glucose, HbA1c, and MAGE

The primary outcome results, differences in HbA1c before and after IWT, are shown in Table 2. The mean HbA1c levels before and after IWT were 7.33% and 7.45% (57 mmol/mol and 58 mmol/mol), respectively, which indicated no significant post-intervention changes in HbA1c levels. Additionally, there were no significant differences in blood C-peptide and IRI levels, and mean glucose levels were rather significantly increased (Table 2). Differences in the pre-and-post IWT mean values of MAGE with 95% confidence intervals were measured using an FGM device. No post-intervention change was observed in MAGE. Effect sizes for these data did not show significant improvement (Table 2). There was a post-intervention decrease and increase in the dose of diabetes drugs in 11 and eight people, respectively.

Table 2. Laboratory tests for glucose metabolism before and after IWT.

Pre IWT Post IWT Difference (pre—post) 95% CI p-value Cohen’s d
HbA1c (%), mean (SD) 7.33 (0.81) 7.45 (0.81) -0.12 [-0.28; 0.40] 0.14 0.15
Serum blood glucose (mg/dL), mean (SD) 136.30 (45.80) 153.50 (44.20) -17.20 [-31.60; -2.80] 0.020 * 0.38
Serum C-peptide (ng/mL), mean (SD) 3.37 (2.10) 3.47 (2.22) -0.10 [-0.64; 0.44] 0.71 0.05
IRI (μU/mL), mean (SD) 41.68 (65.85) 41.06 (58.70) 0.63 [-8.23; 9.48] 0.89 -0.01
MAGE, mean (SD) 84.36 (24.82) 85.09 (22.72) -0.72 [-5.11; 3.67] 0.74 0.03

MAGE indicates the average blood glucose fluctuation exceeding 1 standard deviation. The MAGE values are based on calculating the glucose profiles recorded for each person over 14 days using FreeStyle Libre Pro.

*p < 0.05

Cohen’s d > |0.20|

IWT, interval walking training; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; IRI, immunoreactive insulin; MAGE, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions.

Body composition by CT and MRI

Table 3 indicates the data of the secondary outcome, changes in the body composition before and after IWT. One participant could not undergo MRI because he had a pacemaker. In both statistical hypothesis testing and effect size analysis, liver fat mass (PDFF), visceral fat mass, subcutaneous fat mass, and thigh muscle mass showed no significant post-intervention improvements before and after IWT. However, PDFF showed a post-intervention decreasing trend (8.73% before IWT, 7.59% after IWT, p = 0.051), and similarly, there was a post-intervention decreasing trend in visceral fat (183.58 cm2 before IWT and 174.15 cm2 after IWT, p = 0.065).

Table 3. Body composition data obtained using CT and MRI before and after IWT.

Pre IWT Post IWT Difference (pre—post) 95% CI p-value Cohen’s d
Liver fat mass (PDFF: %) a, mean (SD) 8.73 (6.86) 7.59 (5.74) 1.14 [-0.003; 2.28] 0.051 -0.17
Visceral fat mass (cm2), mean (SD) 183.58 (77.22) 174.15 (81.35) 9.43 [-0.61; 19.47] 0.065 -0.12
Subcutaneous fat mass (cm2), mean (SD) 158.76 (72.11) 152.85 (65.26) 5.90 [-1.44; 13.25] 0.11 -0.08
Thigh muscle mass (cm2), mean (SD) 118.90 (23.12) 117.58 (21.60) 1.32 [-0.95; 3.59] 0.25 -0.06

a: anterior and posterior segment.

CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; IWT, interval walking training; PDFF, proton density fat fraction.

Biochemical data

Table 4 shows the biochemical data and BMI before and after IWT. There was a significant post-intervention increase in HDL cholesterol (from 1.4 mmol/L to 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.0093, Cohen’s d = 0.25) and BUN levels (p = 0.047, Cohen’s d = 0.23). In effect size analysis, triglyceride levels showed significant improvement, and urine albumin levels showed significant deterioration (Cohen’s d = -0.55, 0.74, respectively). There were no significant changes in the other values.

Table 4. Laboratory tests before and after IWT.

Pre IWT Post IWT Difference (pre—post) 95% CI p-value Cohen’s d
HDL-C, (mmol/L), mean (SD) 1.4 (0.4) 1.5 (0.4) -0.07 [-0.1; -0.02] 0.0093** 0.25
LDL-C, (mmol/L), mean (SD) 2.7 (0.6) 2.7 (0.6) -0.06 [-0.2; 0.08] 0.40 0.00
Triglyceride, (mg/dL), mean (SD) 1.8 (1.1) 1.2 (0.7) 0.2 [-0.02; 0.4] 0.075 -0.55
BUN, (mmol/L), mean (SD) 5.6 (1.3) 5.9 (1.4) -0.3 [-0.6; -0.03] 0.047* 0.23
Cre, (umol/L), mean (SD) 72.5 (17.7) 72.5 (16.8) -0.9 [-2.7; 0.9] 0.46 0.00
AST, (IU/L), mean (SD) 26.8 (19.7) 25.1 (14.5) 1.0 [-1.8; 3.8] 0.48 -0.09
ALT, (IU/L), mean (SD) 32.0 (29.8) 30.6 (31.1) 0.2 [-3.2; 3.7] 0.90 -0.05
eGFR, (mL/min/1.73m2), mean (SD) 69.6 (17.4) 67.9 (14.8) 1.7 [-0.4; 3.7] 0.11 -0.10
Urine albumin, (mg/g・Cre), mean(SD) 38.6 (60.9) 83.9 (253.0) -44.0 [-102.3; 14.4] 0.14 0.74
BMI, (kg/m2), mean (SD) 27.1 (3.8) 26.9 (3.6) 0.2 [-0.03; 0.5] 0.084 -0.05
Blood pressure
systolic, (mmHg), mean (SD) 124.5 (14.3) 122.3 (11.8) 1.2 [-3.0; 5.4] 0.56 -0.15
diastolic, (mmHg), mean (SD) 75.9 (12.2) 76.1 (9.6) 0.2 [-3.4; 3.9] 0.90 0.02

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.005

Cohen’s d > |0.20|

IWT, interval walking training; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cre, creatinine; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; BMI, body mass index.

Physical fitness and muscle mass strength

Table 5 shows VO2 peak and thigh muscle strength values before and after IWT. As for muscle strength, there was an upward trend in extension muscle strength (430.1 N before IWT and 448.4 N after IWT, p = 0.064), but no significant difference was observed. The target fast walking time was set to ≥ 60 minutes per week due to the report that the effect of increasing VO2 peak almost plateaued at 50 minutes per week [10]. Therefore, in the analysis of the achievement group only, the VO2 peak was significantly increased by 10% after IWT (from 1,682 mL/min to 1,827 mL/min after, p = 0.0374, Cohen’s d = 0.24), which was similar to conventional data of healthy people [12].

Table 5. Physical fitness and muscle strength before and after IWT.

Pre IWT Post IWT Difference (pre—post) 95% CI p-value Cohen’s d
VO2 peak, (mL/min), mean (SD)
all a(n = 51) 1,672 (673) 1,705 (696) -29 [-112; 56] 0.51 0.05
fast walking time ≥1200 min b(n = 20) 1,682 (615) 1,827 (650) -147 [-282; -10] 0.037* 0.24
fast walking time <1200 min c(n = 31) 1,655 (716) 1,618 (720) 46 [62; 153] 0.39 -0.05
Thigh muscle strength, (N), mean (SD)
Extension muscle strength 430.1 (151.8) 448.4 (131.9) -18.3 [-37.6; 1.1] 0.064 0.12
Flexion muscle strength 261.1 (71.5) 254.3 (72.5) 6.8 [-4.6; 18.2] 0.24 -0.10

*p < 0.05

Cohen’s d > |0.20|

a: all participants in the study

b: participants who reached a fast walking time of ≥1200 min.

c: participants with a fast walking time of <1200 min.

IWT, interval walking training.

Energy intake and consumption

No significant difference showed in the daily energy intake (2008 and 1943 kcal before and after IWT, respectively, p = 0.34). There was a post-intervention decrease in the lipid intake (from 68.1 g/day to 62.1 g/day, p = 0.034); however, no significant post-intervention change was revealed in intake of carbohydrate, protein, dietary fiber, and salt. The daily basal physical activity energy expenditure, excluding calories burned during IWT, and calculation at the weighted average, which was calculated from JD mate, was 108.1 kcal and 101.5 kcal before and after IWT, respectively. Their energy expenditure indicated a non-significant post-intervention decrease (p = 0.054).

Adverse events

Regarding locomotor disorders resulting from IWT, the participants completed a questionnaire at each visit regarding the presence and degree of "joint pain, low back pain, and trauma" during the IWT period. Six persons (12%) complained of mild exacerbation of joint pain due to IWT; however, none of the participants wished to discontinue IWT due to these factors. Severe hypoglycemia was not observed during IWT partly because of the adjustment of diabetic drugs.

Discussion

We demonstrated descriptive statistics of IWT adherence and changes in various data before and after the intervention of IWT in adults with T2D. Further, statistical hypothesis testing and effect size calculation were performed in this study. Although only 39% of the participants achieved the target period of fast walking, all included participants performed the IWT for five months. This study had no significant post-intervention improvements in HbA1c and blood glucose-related data. However, regardless of the amount of fast walking time, we observed a significant increase in HDL cholesterol levels, an improvement tendency in triglycerides, BMI, hepatic fat mass, abdominal visceral fat mass, and muscle strength. In addition, the participants who achieved the target fast walking time showed a significant increase in VO2 peak. Previously, physical fitness could not be increased without applying a high workload. Contrastingly, we found that IWT, an easy-to-perform and available exercise method, could successfully improve physical fitness if the target time of fast walking was achieved. Given the extent of changes in the aforementioned parameters, it is necessary to consider energy intake and consumption. However, there were no significant changes in dietary intake and energy consumption in daily life before and after the intervention. Therefore, the improvements above could be considered almost wholly attributed to the effect of IWT.

It should be noted that although the changes in HDL-C in the whole group and VO2 peak in the target achievement group are statistically significant, the effect sizes are small, Cohen’s d = 0.25, 0.24, respectively, and, therefore, cannot be considered clinically fully significant. Contrastingly, for changes in triglyceride levels of which the p-value was not significant, the effect size was considered intermediate with Cohen’s d = -0.55. These effect sizes should be used for future RCT studies to design appropriate sample sizes, and the detailed effects of IWT, focusing on these parameters, will be examined.

There are some considerations regarding the lack of improvement in blood glucose-related data. The possible causes are as follows. First, there were changes in diabetes drug dosage. Due to the relatively large number of insulin (27.5%) and sulfonylureas (35.3%) users in this study, drug changes were freely permitted to avoid hypoglycemia caused by IWT. As a result, the doses were reduced in 11 (22%) individuals, making it difficult to assess changes in HbA1c. Second, there were seasonal fluctuations in glycemic control for half a year. This study started in July-October and ended in February-April, thus including observing changes in HbA1c from summer to winter. HbA1c has been reported [29] to be 0.22% higher in winter (January to April) than in summer (July to October), and this tendency was observed in low temperatures (< 0°C) during winter. In the Nagano prefecture, where this study was conducted, the temperature often falls below 0°C in winter; therefore, changes in HbA1c may have been affected by seasonal fluctuations.

Exercise therapy is a fundamental treatment for T2D. Generally, it is recommended that adults with T2D perform a moderate-to-intense aerobic exercise (maximum oxygen uptake ≥ 50%) for 150 minutes a week and avoid > two consecutive days of no exercise [6]. However, given the vagueness of this standard, it is difficult to provide specific guidelines in the hospital’s outpatient department, which has led to a decrease in the rate of continuation of exercise in persons with T2D. In this study, we provided raw data regarding the continuation of IWT in the outpatient department of diabetes and showed that the continuation rate of IWT was high. Previous studies only targeted participants who achieved their target momentum. In reality, many outpatients cannot reach the target exercise amount; moreover, data only from some "excellent" participants with diabetes cannot reflect the versatility of specific exercise therapy. Accordingly, in this study, 20 (39%) participants reached the target exercise amount (Fig 2). However, all participants continued IWT to the end within the allowed range (continuation rate: 100%), which indicated the high versatility of IWT. Moreover, locomotor disorders due to IWT were all mild and could not cause discontinuation of IWT. These adherence and safety data suggest the high versatility of IWT according to each individual’s ability.

IWT is based on the concept that exercise training at an intensity above the anaerobic range value effectively increases aerobic capacity. However, such exercise cannot be performed over long periods since it creates acidosis due to lactic acid accumulation. Accordingly, a light exercise interval is placed to allow the body to recover from acidosis. Regarding the strength of ≥ 70% of the VO2 peak in fast walking, we referred to the American College of Sports Medicine’s recommendation of exercise intensity of ≥ 60% of the maximal oxygen uptake for improving physical fitness [30]. Additionally, we chose a strength of 70% of the VO2 peak based on the experience that most middle-aged and older people could walk at high speeds with 70% intensity of the VO2 peak in our center. In this study, the most characteristic feature of IWT is that participants in the achievement group (fast walking for ≥ 60 minutes per week: ≥ 1200 minutes for 20 weeks) showed an average increase in physical fitness of 10%, which is similar to the results of healthy people. Given the presence of sarcopenia and frailty in persons with T2D, it is essential to increase their physical fitness; moreover, doctors applying IWT to individuals with T2D should be aware of this benefit. Previous studies have reported that for 5-month exercise therapy to increase physical fitness in persons with T2D, exercise should be performed at an intensity of 50–75% of the VO2 peak for approximately 50 minutes per day and 3–4 times a week [31]. This exercise amount increased the VO2 peak by 11.8%. Contrastingly, IWT could improve physical fitness with less exercise, suggesting that IWT can increase physical fitness more effectively.

There are other studies on IWT applied to T2D. A Denmark-based group has developed the "InterWalk application," which was inspired and arranged by the JD Mate [32]. IWT using the InterWalk app has been reported to improve glycemic control and exercise adherence for individuals with T2D [32, 33]. However, the InterWalk app is different from JD Mate in that fast and slow walking intensity is self-selective (subjective) and is not determined by the VO2 peak. Therefore, it is not easy to make a simple comparison between their results and ours.

This study had some limitations. First, 39% of the included participants achieved the target exercise amount, which was a lower percentage than expected. In studies on conventional IWT, the achievement rate was approximately 60–90% [17, 18, 34]. However, these studies included many of healthy people who participated in their interests. Additionally, they received frequent advice from JTRC trainers. Second, levels of blood glucose, blood C-peptide, IRI, and triglyceride were measured at any time, not requiring fasting, because some of the participants had difficulty coming to the hospital early in the morning. However, blood samples were collected at about the same time on the first and last visit. Third, since this was a single-group intervention study of the utility of IWT in conventional practice, our findings cannot be strictly attributed to the effect of IWT. To compensate for a weakness of the single-arm study as much as possible, we examined changes in dietary intake and daily life energy consumption before and after the study, and no significant changes were found. This study is useful in estimating the appropriate sample size for designing a future comparative study. Therefore, based on the results of this study alone, we do not describe the effects of IWT completely but rather regard it as a preliminary study for subsequent comparative studies.

In this prospective pilot study, we examined the applicability of IWT in Japanese individuals with T2D. All 51 participants completed the IWT for five months; furthermore, in terms of effect sizes, IWT was suggested to have a positive effect on lipid metabolism and physical fitness. In future RCT studies, the detailed effects of IWT, focusing on these parameters, will be examined. IWT can allow the achievement of physical fitness that could only be previously achieved by applying a high load at the gym. Accordingly, it could be said that IWT is an exercise therapy that combines the effects of both aerobic and resistance exercises. Therefore, IWT has great potential to spread worldwide as exercise therapy for individuals with T2D.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. TREND statement checklist.

(PDF)

S1 File

(DOCX)

S2 File

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Center for Clinical Research, Shinshu University Hospital. We wish to thank Prof. Masayoshi Koinuma (Center for Clinical Research, Shinshu University Hospital and Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Teikyo Heisei University) for the helpful discussions. We wish to thank Prof. Takeji Umemura (Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shinshu University School of Medicine) for the valuable advice on the study design. We want to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing and SRD Holdings Co., Ltd. (www.srd-hd.co.jp) for statistical analyses.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157: 107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boulé NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA. 2001;286(10): 1218–1227. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.10.1218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Naughton GA. Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;2006(3): CD002968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002968.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Snowling NJ, Hopkins WG. Effects of different modes of exercise training on glucose control and risk factors for complications in type 2 diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(11): 2518–2527. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Boulé NG, Wells GA, Prud’homme D, Fortier M et al. Effects of aerobic training, resistance training, or both on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(6): 357–369. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-6-200709180-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.American Diabetes Association. Lifestyle management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Supplement 1): S38–50. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mendes R, Dias E, Gama A, Castelo-Branco M, Themudo-Barata JL. Exercise practice and habitual physical activity levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study in Portugal. Rev Port Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2013;8(1): 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.rpedm.2012.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sato Y, Sone H, Kobayashi M, Kawamori R, Atsumi Y, Oshida Y, et al. Current Situation of Exercise Therapy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in Japan (Report No. 2): A Nationwide Survey to Patients Using the Questionnaires. J. Japan Diabetes Soc. 2015;58(11):850–859. doi: 10.11213/tonyobyo.58.850 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mendes R, Sousa N, Almeida A, Subtil P, Guedes-Marques F, Reis VM, et al. Exercise prescription for patients with type 2 diabetes-a synthesis of international recommendations: narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(22): 1379–1381. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Masuki S, Morikawa M, Nose H. High-intensity walking time is a key determinant to increase physical fitness and improve health outcomes after interval walking training in middle-aged and older people. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(12): 2415–2426. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamazaki T, Gen-no H, Kamijo Y, Okazaki K, Masuki S, Nose H. A new device to estimate VO2 during incline walking by accelerometry and barometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(12): 2213–2219. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181a9c452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nemoto K, Gen-no H, Masuki S, Okazaki K, Nose H. Effects of high-intensity interval walking training on physical fitness and blood pressure in middle-aged and older people. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(7): 803–811. doi: 10.4065/82.7.803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Masuki S, Morikawa M, Nose H. Internet of things (IoT) system and field sensors for exercise intensity measurements. Compr Physiol. 2020;10(3): 1207–1240. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c190010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nose H, Morikawa M, Yamazaki T, Nemoto K, Okazaki K, Masuki S, et al. Beyond epidemiology: field studies and the physiology laboratory as the whole world. J Physiol. 2009;587(Pt 23): 5569–5575. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.179499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Masuki S, Morikawa M, Nose H. Interval Walking Training Can Increase Physical Fitness in Middle-Aged and Older People. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017. Jul;45(3):154–162. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Morishima Y, Mizushima T, Yamauchi K, Morikawa M, Masuki S, Nose H. Effects of home-based interval walking training on thigh muscle strength and aerobic capacity in female total hip arthroplasty patients: a randomized, controlled pilot study. PLoS One. 2014. Sep 30;9(9):e108690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108690 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Morikawa M, Okazaki K, Masuki S, Kamijo Y, Yamazaki T, Gen-no H, et al. Physical fitness and indices of lifestyle-related diseases before and after interval walking training in middle-aged and older males and females. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(3): 216–224. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.064816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Karstoft K, Winding K, Knudsen SH, Nielsen JS, Thomsen C, Pedersen BK, et al. The effects of free-living interval-walking training on glycemic control, body composition, and physical fitness in type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(2): 228–236. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kobayashi S, Murakami K, Sasaki S, Okubo H, Hirota N, Notsu A, et al. Comparison of relative validity of food group intakes estimated by comprehensive and brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaires against 16 d dietary records in Japanese adults. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(7): 1200–1211. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Service FJ, Molnar GD, Rosevear JW, Ackerman E, Gatewood LC, Taylor WF. Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability. Diabetes. 1970;19(9): 644–655. doi: 10.2337/diab.19.9.644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reeder SB. Emerging quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers of hepatic steatosis. Hepatol. 2013;58(6): 1877–1880. doi: 10.1002/hep.26543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hernando D, Sharma SD, Kramer H, Reeder SB. On the confounding Effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded fat quantification. Magn Reason. 2014;72(2): 464–470. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Noureddin M, Lam J, Peterson MR, Middleton M, Hamilton G, Le TA, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging versus histology for quantifying changes in liver fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease trials. Hepatol. 2013;58(6): 1930–1940. doi: 10.1002/hep.26455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Borkan GA, Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Hults DE, Silbert CK, Silbert JE. Assessment of abdominal fat content by computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36(1): 172–177. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.1.172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goodpaster BH, Carlson CL, Visser M, Kelley DE, Scherzinger A, Harris TB, et al. Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: the Health ABC Study. J Appl Physiol. 2001;90(6): 2157–2165. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Suga H, Asakura K, Sasaki S, Nojima M, Okubo H, Hirota N, et al. Effect of seasonality on the estimated mean value of nutrients and ranking ability of a self-administered diet history questionnaire. Nutr J. 2014;13: 51. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kwak SG, Kim JH. Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70(2):144–156. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1988. doi: 10.4324/9780203771587 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tseng CL, Brimacombe M, Xie M, Rajan M, Wang H, Kolassa J, et al. Seasonal patterns in monthly hemoglobin A1c values. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161(6): 565–574. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi071 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ferguson B. ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 9th Ed. 2014. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2014;58(3): 328. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boulé NG, Kenny GP, Haddad E, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Meta-analysis of the Effect of structured exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2003;46(8): 1071–1081. doi: 10.1007/s00125-003-1160-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Christensen JF, Sundberg A, Osterkamp J, Thorsen-Streit S, Nielsen AB, Olsen CK, et al. Interval walking improves glycemic control and body composition after cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;104(9): 3701–3712. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Valentiner LS, Thorsen IK, Kongstad MB, Brinkløv CF, Larsen RT, Karstoft K, et al. Effect of ecological momentary assessment, goal-setting and personalized phone-calls on adherence to interval walking training using the InterWalk application among patients with type 2 diabetes-A pilot randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(1): e0208181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tanabe A, Masuki S, Nemoto KI, Nose H. Seasonal influence on adherence to and effects of an interval walking training program on sedentary female college students in Japan. Int J Biometeorol. 2018;62(4): 643–654. doi: 10.1007/s00484-017-1473-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jennifer Annette Campbell

28 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-23027Interval walking training in type 2 diabetes: A pilot study to evaluate the applicability as exercise therapyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Oiwa,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by March 31, 2023. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jennifer Annette Campbell, PhD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: A single-arm intervention clinical pilot trial was conducted which aimed to evaluate the efficacy of interval walking training (IWT) on glucose and lipid metabolism, body composition, physical fitness, and muscle strength in subjects with type 2 diabetes. No statistically significant changes in the primary outcomes (HbA1c and body composition) were observed. The target achievement subgroup showed a statistically significant increase in VO2 peak.

Minor revisions:

1- Abstract: Clarify which outcomes are primary and which are secondary.

2- Abstract: List the statistical methods used for estimating the p-values.

3- Remove the results where a trend is claimed.

4- Indicate if the distribution of the data was checked for normality prior to applying paired t-tests.

5- Line 252: Include the standard deviations that correspond to the means.

6- It is standard practice to summarize normally distributed data using means and standard deviations. For non-normally distributed data, use median, first and third quartiles.

7- Thoroughly proofread the manuscript. Sometimes the phraseology is non-standard.

Reviewer #2: General Comments:

In this paper the authors presents a study to evaluate the effect of interval walking training on glucose and lipid metabolism, body composition, physical fitness and muscle strength in persons with type 2 diabetes, which sounds novel and original since many studies have not been published in this area, but at the moment the manuscript has not been presented in an intelligible fashion and the method has not been described in sufficient detail. There are grammar and language issues across the manuscript that require attention and proof reading. Please thoroughly check it.

Abstract

In the materials and methods (page 2 line 34-38) the frequency and intensity of the intervention should be clearly stated.

In the results (page 3 line 39-51), no significant effects should be stated as ‘though no significant, there tend to be improvement in ……’

In the conclusion (page 3 line 52-55), with no improvement in the main study outcome and only one secondary outcome, this section should be written modestly in accordance with the results.

Introduction

The introduction does not provide sufficient background and do not include all relevant references. The sections needs to be rewritten for clarity of purpose and to reflect novelty, rigour and impact as well as rationale for this study.

Page 4 line 63: add ‘combined’ aerobic and resistance exercise...

Page 4 line 64: change ‘effectively’ to ‘effective’

Page 4 line 67: change ‘side’ to ‘hand’, rephrase to ‘there is a low uptake of exercise, with…’

Page 4 line 69: remove ‘people’

Page 4 line 70-71: rephrase to ‘Another reason for the low exercise uptake among people with type 2 diabetes could be difficulty on the part of medical professionals to teach ….’

Page 5-6 line 73-101: this should be summarised to provide a rational for the current study. The details of the protocol should only be referenced. Example ‘details of the protocol is published elsewhere (aa et al., 1999)’

Materials and methods

This is not adequately described and must be improved significantly. Currently, it is difficult to replicate in terms of the description provided.

Research design

Page 8 lines 124-126: Unclear

Line 128: Participant registration should be ‘Participants’ only

Page 9 line 129: How were participants recruited? Why was BMI 20-34kg/m2 an inclusion criterion?

Intervention protocol

The outcomes and their respective measures, how, when and where they were taken should be clearly stated, and should be delineated under the section ‘Outcome measures’ before the 'Intervention protocol'.

The intervention should be clearly outlined. Currently it is difficulty to follow. Would be helpful if it done chronologically.

Page line 194-198: MAGE measurement

Did participants wear the device throughout the 20weeks of the study? It is mentioned here 2weeks before start of study and for 18 weeks after the start of the study. In the intervention it was mentioned that 18th week of the study. Please reconcile.

Line 224: What is fastest walking? How was it determined? How is low, medium and high speed differentiated?

Results

Needs to be rewritten for clarity. May be better to state clearly significant findings followed by non-significant findings or vice-versa under each section, rather than mix them together

Line 250: Change to ‘Basal’ to ‘Baseline’ characteristics

Page 15 line 254: ‘hypertension and dsylipdemia showed 68.6% is unclear.

Line 328-331: Please state non-significant finding as such. The target fast walking time needs to be properly explained from the onset in the methods.

Line 334: reference needed.

Line 335: Table 5. What is all (51) and the associated values?

Discussion

This section should be written to provide a more holistic perspective of the current findings in relation to literature.

Reviewer #3: Introduction

In line 68-70, the authors stated without appropriate citation, “This low practice rate could be attributed to low people motivation, limited time availability, management problems, and lack of willpower or control.”

In line 73-76, the authors stated without appropriate citation, “The Department of Sports Medical Sciences, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine, developed a unique walking method termed interval walking training (IWT) in 1999. There has been active research and development of IWT, with approximately 8,700 individuals of overall good health participating in these studies.”

In line 92-93, the authors only cited one article but stated, “There is a plethora of scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of IWT, with increasing worldwide attention [11].”

Materials and Methods:

Did the authors do any power calculation? How did the authors arrive at 51 participants as the appropriate sample size for the pilot study?

How did the authors arrived at 20 weeks of follow-up? Why not 6 months or a year?

Results:

In line 44-49, the authors stated, “However, there was significant improvement in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 1.4 mmol/L to 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.0093). Further, there was improvement trend in liver fat mass (from 8.73% to 7.59%, p = 0.051), visceral fat mass (from 183.58 cm2 to 174.15 cm2, p = 0.065), and extension muscle strength (from 430.1 N to 448.4 N, p = 0.064). In the target achievement group, a significant increase in VO2 peak by 10% (from 1,682 mL/min to 1,827 mL/min, p = 0.037) was observed.” The changes in liver fat mass, visceral fat mass, and extension muscle strength are not statistically significant based on their p-values. Why did the authors state otherwise?

The change in HDL (from 1.4 mmol/L to 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.0093) is statistically significant, does the authors think the change in HDL is clinically significant?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 May 18;18(5):e0285762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285762.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


12 Apr 2023

Dear Reviewer 1,

We are grateful to Reviewer 1 for the constructive comments and useful suggestions that have helped us to improve our paper considerably. As indicated in the responses that follow, we have taken all these comments and suggestions into account in the revised version of our paper.

Comment #1- Abstract: Clarify which outcomes are primary and which are secondary.

Response: We have clearly stated the primary and secondary outcomes in the Abstract section. (lines 46-47)

Comment #2- Abstract: List the statistical methods used for estimating the p-values.

Response: We have added a description of the t-test to the Abstract section. (line 49 and line 51)

Comment #3- Remove the results where a trend is claimed.

Response: We have removed expressions such as “trend” and instead stated the results. (lines 46-51)

Comment #4- Indicate if the distribution of the data was checked for normality prior to applying paired t-tests.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the valuable comment. Since the number of samples is sufficiently large (n = 51), due to the idea of the central limit theorem, we applied a paired t-test without checking for normality. We have added this to statistical analyses in the Materials and Methods section. (lines 272-273)

Comment #5- Line 252: Include the standard deviations that correspond to the means.

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have added standard deviations where appropriate. (line 282)

Comment #6- It is standard practice to summarize normally distributed data using means and standard deviations. For non-normally distributed data, use median, first and third quartiles.

Response: As the reviewer pointed out, we believe that it is a fundamental and very important issue from a statistical point of view. We consulted statistics experts at the study planning stage. As described in lines 272-273 of the Materials and Methods section, the number of participants in this study was sufficiently large (n = 51): therefore, based on the concept of the central limit theorem, we judged that the data of this study could be statistically regarded as a having normal distribution.

Comment #7- Thoroughly proofread the manuscript. Sometimes the phraseology is non-standard.

Response: We apologize for the inappropriate expressions in some of the sentences. We have thoroughly proofread the manuscript. The manuscript has undergone professional English proofreading again.

Yours sincerely,

Ako Oiwa MD., Ph.D.

Dear Reviewer 2,

We are grateful to Reviewer 2 for the constructive comments and useful suggestions that have helped us to improve our paper considerably. As indicated in the responses that follow, we have taken all these comments and suggestions into account in the revised version of our paper.

Abstract:

Comment #1

In the materials and methods (page 2 line 34-38) the frequency and intensity of the intervention should be clearly stated.

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. As suggested by the reviewer, we have added these details to the Abstract section. (lines 37-44)

Comment #2

In the results (page 3 line 39-51), no significant effects should be stated as ‘though no significant, there tend to be improvement in ……’

Response: As per the reviewer’s comment, we have corrected the Abstract section for improved clarity. We have removed the word "tend or trend." (lines 45-55)

Comment #3

In the conclusion (page 3 line 52-55), with no improvement in the main study outcome and only one secondary outcome, this section should be written modestly in accordance with the results.

Response: We agree with the reviewer’s view. We have revised the Abstract section. As pointed out by other reviewers, we added effect size calculations and rewrote the Abstract accordingly. (lines 55-58)

Introduction

The introduction does not provide sufficient background and do not include all relevant references. The sections needs to be rewritten for clarity of purpose and to reflect novelty, rigour and impact as well as rationale for this study.

Comment #4: Page 4 line 63: add ‘combined’ aerobic and resistance exercise...

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have corrected the relevant text. (line 66)

Comment #5: Page 4 line 64: change ‘effectively’ to ‘effective’

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have corrected the relevant text. (line 67)

Comment #6: Page 4 line 67: change ‘side’ to ‘hand’, rephrase to ‘there is a low uptake of exercise, with…’

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have corrected the relevant text. (line 70)

Comment #7: Page 4 line 69: remove ‘people’

Response: We have corrected the relevant text. (line 72)

Comment #8: Page 4 line 70-71: rephrase to ‘Another reason for the low exercise uptake among people with type 2 diabetes could be difficulty on the part of medical professionals to teach ….’

Response: We have corrected the relevant text. (lines 73-74)

Comments #9: Page 5-6 line 73-101: this should be summarised to provide a rational for the current study. The details of the protocol should only be referenced. Example ‘details of the protocol is published elsewhere (aa et al., 1999)’

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing this out. We have corrected the relevant text, provided a clearer summary, and provided references for further study details. (lines 76-99)

Material and Methods

Research design

Comments #10: Page 8 lines 124-126: Unclear

Response: As the reviewer pointed out, the explanation of Fig.2 was omitted. We have added the description of Fig.2 in detail. (lines 133-142)

Comments #11: Line 128: Participant registration should be ‘Participants’ only.

Response: We have corrected the relevant text. (line 147)

Comments #12: Page 9 line 129: How were participants recruited? Why was BMI 20-34kg/m2 an inclusion criterion?

Response: We have added the method of recruitment. (lines 148-151) Since this study was a pilot study and adverse events due to IWT could not be predicted at the beginning of the study, lean persons or individuals with obesity were excluded to avoid the risk of the onset of locomotor disorders. The minimum average BMI for each age group of Japanese people is from 20 to 21 (women in their twenties): therefore, the minimum BMI for selection criteria is 20. The maximum BMI of 34 was slightly less than the definition for patients with obesity, 35. In other words, we used the BMI (20 to 34), which we empirically believe to be safe for Japanese patients with diabetes to exercise.

Intervention Protocol

Comments #13: The outcomes and their respective measures, how, when and where they were taken should be clearly stated, and should be delineated under the section ‘Outcome measures’ before the 'Intervention protocol'.

The intervention should be clearly outlined. Currently it is difficulty to follow. Would be helpful if it done chronologically.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the valuable comment. We agree with the reviewer that the original text made it difficult to understand our protocol. We have added a new section, “Outcome measures” before the Intervention protocol section. (lines 159-173) In addition, we have corrected the Intervention protocol so that it is in a chronological easy-to-understand manner. (lines 175-205)

Comment #14: Page line 194-198: MAGE measurement: Did participants wear the device throughout the 20weeks of the study? It is mentioned here 2weeks before start of study and for 18 weeks after the start of the study. In the intervention it was mentioned that 18th week of the study. Please reconcile.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the detailed comments. We have corrected the MAGE measurement in the Materials and methods section (line 221), as follows. “An FGM device (FreeStyle Libre Pro) was worn for two weeks at the beginning of the study and two weeks from the 18th week of the study.”

Comment #15: Line 224: What is fastest walking? How was it determined? How is low, medium and high speed differentiated?

Response: Low, medium, and high speed are subjective judgments made by participants. We have included this in line 243 of the revised manuscript.

Results

Needs to be rewritten for clarity. May be better to state clearly significant findings followed by non-significant findings or vice-versa under each section, rather than mix them together

Comments #16: Line 250: Change to ‘Basal’ to ‘Baseline’ characteristics

Response: We have corrected the relevant text. (line 280)

Comments #17: Page 15 line 254: ‘hypertension and dsylipdemia showed 68.6% is unclear.

Response: We have corrected this as indicated. (line 284)

Comments #18: Line 328-331: Please state non-significant finding as such. The target fast walking time needs to be properly explained from the onset in the methods.

Response: We have changed the expression as suggested (lines 362-364): we have changed to clearly stated non-significant findings as such. At the beginning of the Material and Methods section (lines 123-125), we have explained the target fast walking time.

Comments #19: Line 334: reference needed.

Response: We have added a reference. (line 369)

Comments #20: Line 335: Table 5. What is all (51) and the associated values?

Response: For clarity, we have annotated all (n = 51) and ≥1200 min (n = 20) and <1200 min (n = 31) in Table 5. (lines 373-375)

Discussion

This section should be written to provide a more holistic perspective of the current findings in relation to literature.

Response: From the point of view of the effect size, we have clearly stated that this study is essential for future RCT studies. (lines 416-423, lines 500-502)

Yours sincerely,

Ako Oiwa MD., Ph.D.

Dear Reviewer 3,

We are grateful to Reviewer 3 for the constructive comments and useful suggestions that have helped us to improve our paper considerably. As indicated in the responses that follow, we have taken all these comments and suggestions into account in the revised version of our paper.

Introduction

Comments #1: In line 68-70, the authors stated without appropriate citation, “This low practice rate could be attributed to low people motivation, limited time availability, management problems, and lack of willpower or control.”

Response: We have added a reference. (line 73, reference No. 8)

Comments #2: In line 73-76, the authors stated without appropriate citation, “The Department of Sports Medical Sciences, Shinshu University Graduate School of Medicine, developed a unique walking method termed interval walking training (IWT) in 1999. There has been active research and development of IWT, with approximately 8,700 individuals of overall good health participating in these studies.”

Response: We have added a reference. (line 86, 88) Other reviewers pointed out that this section was difficult to understand: therefore, we have changed the structure of the entire sentence above. (lines 76-91)

Comments #3: In line 92-93, the authors only cited one article but stated, “There is a plethora of scientific evidence supporting the efficacy of IWT, with increasing worldwide attention [11].”

Response: We thank the reviewer for the comments. We have added some necessary references. (line 91)

Comments #4: Materials and Methods:

Did the authors do any power calculation? How did the authors arrive at 51 participants as the appropriate sample size for the pilot study?

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out this important part of the core of statistics. We have corrected sentences in Sample size in the Materials and Methods section (lines 261-265), as follows. “Since this study is a prospective, single-arm pilot study, the purpose of this pilot study is to demonstrate descriptive statistics of IWT adherence and changes in various data before and after the intervention of IWT in adults with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we did not calculate the sample size setting by power analysis, as our primary goal was not to perform a hypothesis testing. With a view to feasibility, 70 participants were recruited, and 51 cases were finally registered.”

In this paper, many phrases indicate the evaluation of effectiveness: therefore, the aim in the Abstract section (lines 34-36) has been rewritten.

Further, we have added the results of effect size (Cohen's d), as effect size calculations in this study are essential to determine the sample size for future RCT studies. Therefore, by inserting sentences related to effect size, we have added and corrected the followings: Table 2, 3, 4, 5, lines 319-320, 334, 349-350, 416-423.

Comments #5:

How did the authors arrived at 20 weeks of follow-up? Why not 6 months or a year?

Response:

We thank the reviewer for the valuable comments. The reason for setting 20 weeks is that we have found that physical fitness improvement with IWT occurs after 20 weeks of intervention (Nemoto et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2007), and that physical fitness increases by 10–15% in the first 20 weeks and then maintains physical fitness with continued IWT (Masuki et al. J Appl Physiol 2015). It is possible to set it to 6 months or 1 year, however, based on these research results, we set 20 weeks as one period when the effect of IWT can be recognized. We have added this in Research Design in the Materials and Methods section. (lines 125-128)

Comments #6: Results:

In line 44-49, the authors stated, “However, there was significant improvement in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (from 1.4 mmol/L to 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.0093). Further, there was improvement trend in liver fat mass (from 8.73% to 7.59%, p = 0.051), visceral fat mass (from 183.58 cm2 to 174.15 cm2, p = 0.065), and extension muscle strength (from 430.1 N to 448.4 N, p = 0.064). In the target achievement group, a significant increase in VO2 peak by 10% (from 1,682 mL/min to 1,827 mL/min, p = 0.037) was observed.” The changes in liver fat mass, visceral fat mass, and extension muscle strength are not statistically significant based on their p-values. Why did the authors state otherwise?

Response: We agree with the reviewer’s point. Based on the view that only significant differences are statistically meaningful, we have changed the Result in the Abstract section. (lines 45-55)

Comments #7:

The change in HDL (from 1.4 mmol/L to 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.0093) is statistically significant, does the authors think the change in HDL is clinically significant?

Response: We thank the reviewer for valuable comment. Regarding the amount of change in HDL-C, the effect size (Cohen’s d) is 0.25, which is a "small effect size": therefore, it is difficult to say that it is clinically fully significant. In addition, the VO2 peak in the target achievement group, which had a significant difference in the p-value, also had a "small effect size." In the Discussion section, we have added the sentence "The effect size was small." (lines 416-423)

Yours sincerely,

Ako Oiwa MD., Ph.D.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jennifer Annette Campbell

2 May 2023

Interval walking training in type 2 diabetes: A pilot study to evaluate the applicability as exercise therapy

PONE-D-22-23027R1

Dear Dr. Oiwa,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jennifer Annette Campbell, PHD, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Jennifer Annette Campbell

10 May 2023

PONE-D-22-23027R1

Interval walking training in type 2 diabetes: A pilot study to evaluate the applicability as exercise therapy

Dear Dr. Oiwa:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jennifer Annette Campbell

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. TREND statement checklist.

    (PDF)

    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    S2 File

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES