Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: DNA Repair (Amst). 2005 Jul 21;4(11):1240–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.06.006

Table 5.

Stimulation of SCE by MMS and 4-NQO in wild-type, sml1, rad53 and chk1 strains

Genotype (strain)a His+/CFU × 106 (avg) after 4-NQO exposure (survival %)
His+/CFU × 106 (avg) after MMS exposure(survival%)
Controlb 2 μM 10 μM Ratioc Controlb 2 mM 10 mM Ratioc
RAD (YB163) 15 ± 4 74 ± 20 (71) 164 ± 48 (30) 5, 11 15 ± 5 59 ± 12 (92) 118 ± 27 (60) 4, 8
sml1 (YB227) 10 ± 1 96 ± 20 (69) 323 ± 18 (9) 10, 32 10 ± 1 51 ± 1 (100) 99 ± 5 (70) 5, 10
rad53 sml1 (YB229) 23 ± 2 53 ± 16 (51) 79 ± 30 (2) 2, 3 21 ± 2 54 ± 4 (75) 42 ± 5 (24) 3, 2
rad53 (YB230) 16 ± 7 28 ± 14 (61) 73 ± 20 (7) 2, 4 24 ± 10 37 ± 7 (70) 81 ± 15 (8) 2, 3
chk1(YB335) 19 ± 1 130 ± 42 (52) 400 ± 190 (20) 7, 21 19 ± 1 62 ± 17 (71) 163 ± 15 (71) 3, 8
a

For complete phenotype, see Table 1.

b

Frequency is events/viable cells; n = 3.

c

His+ frequency w/agents/spontaneous His+ frequency; first and second numbers indicate ratios for lower and higher concentrations, respectively.