Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 18;24(8):2161–2170. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004919

Table 2.

Subgroup and meta-regression analysis of relative risk (RR) of maternal depression

Subgroup Number of studies Pooled OR/RR 95 % CI P * I 2 (%) P
Total 13 0·49 0·35, 0·63 0·001 82·10
Depression type
 APD 6 0·51 0·37, 0·65 0·024 61·20 0·513
 PPD 7 0·48 0·24, 0·72 0·001 82·80
Study design
 Cohort study 8 0·51 0·37, 0·65 0·002 69·30 0·711
 Case–control 2 0·65 –0·05, 1·34 0·037 86·90
 Cross-sectional study 3 0·34 0·04, 0·59 0·047 69·60
Depression measurement
 CES-D 4 0·49 0·34, 0·64 0·010 73·60 0·164
 EPDS 6 0·41 0·17, 0·65 0·001 75·80
 Others 3 0·65 0·22, 1·08 0·021 74·20
25(OH)D measurement
 Venous blood 11 0·43 0·29, 0·58 0·001 79·80 0·284
 Cord blood 2 0·74 0·56, 0·93 0·718 0·00
Latitude
 Low 3 0·65 0·41, 0·88 0·702 0·00 0·462
 Middle 10 0·46 0·31, 0·61 0·001 85·10
Race
 Caucasian 8 0·46 0·33, 0·59 0·003 67·10 0·347
 Asian 3 0·51 –0·04, 1·05 0·001 93·40
 Mixed 2 0·85 0·34, 1·37 0·919 0·00
Season of 25(OH)D measurement
 Summer 3 0·25 0·08, 0·43 0·201 28·50 0·008
 Winter 2 0·46 0·28, 0·64 0·233 29·60
 All 8 0·68 0·52, 0·83 0·201 28·50
Age adjusted
 Yes 3 0·32 0·02, 0·63 0·040 69·00 0·477
 No 10 0·53 0·39, 0·67 0·001 70·70
Education adjusted
 Yes 2 0·15 0·07, 0·24 0·345 0·00 0·159
 No 11 0·54 0·41, 0·68 0·001 69·20
Parity adjusted
 Yes 3 0·24 0·04, 0·44 0·046 67·50 0·347
 No 10 0·55 0·42, 0·68 0·005 61·90
History of depression adjusted
 Yes 1 0·84 0·28, 1·41 0·479
 No 12 0·47 0·33, 0·62 0·001 82·80
BMI adjusted
 Yes 2 0·52 0·01, 1·04 0·103 62·40 0·809
 No 11 0·49 0·33, 0·64 0·001 84·40
Smoking adjusted
 Yes 2 0·47 –0·13, 1·07 0·039 76·40 0·909
 No 11 0·51 0·35, 0·66 0·001 83·70

APD, antepartum depression; PPD, postpartum depression; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; EPDS, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.

*

P for heterogeneity within each subgroup.

P for heterogeneity between subgroups in the meta-regression analysis.