Table 6.
Extracted information on the ethics status of included studies in present rapid review
| Study | SoMe platform(s) | Ethics approval or mention if present |
|---|---|---|
| Formal ethics approval | ||
| Blackstone et al. (76) | Approved by the IRB at the researchers’ universities. | |
| Nguyen et al. (52) | The University of Utah Institutional Review Board | |
| Nguyen et al. (64) | Twitter Yelp | The University of Utah Institutional Review Board |
| Vyidiswaran et al. (85) | University of Michigan Institutional Review Board | |
| Formal ethics review with exemption granted | ||
| Cavazos-Rehg et al. (65) | Institutional review board exemption. | |
| Mention of ethics consideration in the absence of formal review | ||
| ElTayeby et al. (67) | Facebook group | Deidentified posts. |
| Karami et al. (55) | Publicly available tweets. | |
| Turner-McGrievy et al. (75) | Conducted in accordance with ethical standards | |
| Wombacher et al. (66) | Messages on Twitter are publicly available | |
| No ethical approval or mention | ||
| Abbar et al. Twitter(57); Alhabash et al. Twitter(73); Alajajian et al. Twitter(50); Carrotte et al. Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Instagram(77); Chen et al. Twitter(63); Fried et al. Twitter(58); Huang et al. Twitter(69), Kershaw et al. Twitter(70), Mejova et al. Instagram, Foursquare(59), Ofli et al. Instagram(60), Pang et al. Instagram(71), Phan et al. Instagram(72), Primack et al. YouTube(68); Rahman et al. Twitter, Foursquare(78), Rich et al. Instagram(61), Nguyen et al. Twitter(49); Shah et al. Twitter(47); Sharma et al. Instagram(62), Silva et al. Foursquare(56); Sullivan et al. Amazon(81); Sun, et al. Twitter(51); Vidal et al. Twitter(54); Widener et al. Twitter(53); Yan et al. Koubei(79); Zhou et al. Weibo(80). | ||
IRB, institutional review board.