Table 3.

Pearson’s correlation (r) for 3D-HM versus CMR and 3D-HM versus LVA in all cases (n = 198)

	r	p
3D-HM vs. CMR
EF (%)	0.824	< 0.0001*
EDV (ml)	0.921	< 0.0001*
ESV (ml)	0.944	< 0.0001*
3D-HM vs. LVA
EF (%)	0.745	< 0.0001*

*Statistically significant correlation (p<0.05)