Skip to main content
. 2023 May 18;14:2852. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38247-5

Table 3.

Two qubit characterization

Gate CX length (ns) EPG (%) EPG_simul (%)
11_14 483.6 0.53 0.95
12_15 433.8 0.78 1.42
12_10 334.2 0.42 1.02
12_13 519.1 0.61 1.03
14_13 504.9 0.77 1.49
15_18 469.3 0.49 1.10
16_14 440.9 0.50 0.82
16_19 696.9 2.09 1.14
18_17 426.7 4.03 3.96
18_21 348.4 0.56 0.73
2_1 362.7 0.34 0.55
21_23 519.1 0.65 0.67
22_19 362.7 0.50 0.94
22_25 412.4 0.47 0.57
24_23 384.0 0.64 0.81
24_25 384.0 0.69 0.91
3_2 426.7 0.52 0.53
3_5 391.1 0.40 0.64
4_1 547.6 0.46 0.49
5_8 348.4 0.47 0.71
7_10 362.7 1.42 0.76
7_4 426.7 0.39 0.54
8_11 526.2 1.16 1.39
9_8 384.0 0.58 0.84
Mean 437.3 0.81 1.00
Std. 82.5 0.77 0.68

The two qubit CX gates are constructed from the echoed cross-resonance gate46, with lengths and gate directions optimized for overall device performance. EPG is measured with spectator qubits idling while simultaneous EPG is taken with spectator qubits undergoing single qubit RB. Mean and standard deviation are across all CX gates listed.