TABLE 2.
Gaps in evidence/pitfalls | Recommendations |
---|---|
The use of a single biomarker is not sufficient for monitoring patients over time across the TBI spectrum | Biomarker panels are needed for better assessment of diverse clinical phenotypes of patients with TBI. Including markers from different modalities is needed for effective joint benefit. |
Heterogeneity in the monitoring of brain injury biomarkers | • More research is needed to explore the optimal sampling protocol for each biomarker. |
• A protocolized algorithm that guides sampling based on the kinetics of each biomarker. | |
Confounding Factors | Variations could be minimized via employing stratified randomization based on possible confounders such as: • Type and severity of the injury.• Renal functions. |
Lack of data from RCTs about the effect of adjuvant pharmacotherapies on different brain injury biomarkers | Exploring potential benefits of the promising agents reported in the current review, such as metformin and tetracyclines, on other emerging biomarkers. |
Clinical investigation of novel therapeutic approaches | Promising agents for future clinical research • High dose vitamin D • Melatonin. • Nicotinamides. |