Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;13:1132306. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132306

Table 2.

Risk of bias and quality assessment.

Author Case/
Representative
Representative/Nonexposed Controls/Exposure Definition/Outcome not present Confounding Exposure/Outcome Method/Follow-up Nonresponse/Adequate follow-up Score
Puzzono 2022 (22) * * * * * * * 7
Nguyen 2022 (23) * * ** * * * 7
McDowell 2022 (24) * * * * * * * * 8
Li 2022 (25) * * * ** * * * 8
Jin 2022 (26) * * * * ** * * * 9
Pang 2022 (27) * * * * ** * 7
Danial 2022 (28) * * * * * * 6
Archambault 2021 (29) * * * * * * * * 8
Kim 2021 (30) * * ** * * 6
Zheng 2021 (31) * * * ** * * * 8
Yue 2021 (32) * * * ** * * * 8
Schumacher 2021 (33) * * * * ** * * * 9
Nguyen 2021 (34) * * * ** * * * 8
Joh 2021 (35) * * * ** * * * 8
Chen 2021 (36) * * * * ** * * * 9
Hur 2021 (37) * * * ** * * * 8
Chang 2021 (38) * * * ** * * 7
Demb 2020 (39) * * * ** * * * 8
Dash 2020 (40) * * ** * * * 7
Low 2020 (13) * * * * * * 6
Gausman 2020 (41) * * * * * * 6
L'Heureux 2019 (42) * * * * * * 6
Liu 2019 (43) * * ** * * * 7
Syed 2019 (44) * * * ** * * 7
Glover 2019 (15) * * * * ** * * 8
Nguyen 2018 (45) * * * ** * * * 8
Levi 2017 (46) * * * * * * * 7
Kwak 2016 (21) * * * * * * 6
Wu 2013 (47) * * * * * * 6
Søndergaard 2013 (48) * * * * * * * 7
Rosato 2013 (49) * * * ** * * * 8
Ghadirian 1998 (50) * * * * * * 6
Negri 1998 (51) * * * * * * 6
Fuchs 1994 (52) * * ** * * * 7
St John 1993 (53) * * * * * * 6
Peter 1989 (54) * * * * * * * 7

The NOS is a quality scale that evaluates studies based on 3 broad categories: selection (maximum of four stars); comparability (maximum of two stars); and exposure/outcome (maximum of three stars). *, one point; **, two points; -, no points.