Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 29;13(8):2632–2656. doi: 10.7150/thno.82323

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(A) Chemical structure and sensing mechanism of CARSH probe. (B) The FL intensity changes with the increase of HOCl concentration. (C) The relationship between HOCl concentration and FL signal ratio (I580/I490). (D) FL images of RAW264.7 cell after incubation with CARSH probe, and (E) corresponding ratio (red/blue) of FL intensity. (F) Proposed mechanisms of DCNP@SeTT@PEG probes for sensing of HClO within tumor and inflammation of rabbit models. (G) The FL intensity changes with the HClO concentration, and (H) corresponding I1150 nm/I1550 nm. (I) FL images in mice after intravenous injection of probe, and (J) I1150 nm/I1550 nm as a function of time. (K) Mechanism of SOA@NIR775 probe for ratiometric PA sensing of ClO-. (L) Changes in the absorption spectra of probes after the addition of different concentrations of ClO-. (M) PA images of probes treated with different concentrations of ClO-. (N) Variation of PA signal ratio with ClO- concentration. (O) PA images of subcutaneous 4T1 tumor after intravenous injection of probes, and (P) corresponding PA signal ratio. (A-E) Adapted with permission from 111, Copyright 2016 Elsevier. (F-J) Adapted with permission from 112, Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (K-P) Adapted with permission from 116, Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.