Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;16:1367–1377. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S396788

Table 2.

Dependency of Adequacy on Selected Parameters as Evaluated Using Logistic Regression

Variable Constant Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval P value Impact on Adequacy
Age −0.008 0.992 0.969–1.016 0.525 None
BMI 0.52 1.053 0.984–1.127 0.135 None
Log2(CA-125) 1.073 0.929–1.239 0.338 None
Ascites
<1000mL −0.617 0.540 0.217–1.344 0.185 None
≥1000mL 0.617 1.857 0.744–4.617 0.185 None
Indication
Diagnose 0.685 1.984 1.020–3.859 0.044 Positive
Metastasis −1.22 0.295 0.085–1.028 0.55 None
Relapse −0.432 0.649 0.328–1.284 0.214 None
Site of biopsy
Pelvic tumor −1.075 0.341 0.157–0.744 0.007 Negative
Carcinomatosis 0.611 1.841 0.624–5.435 0.268 None
Omentum 0.975 2.65 0.610–11.527 0.193 None
Lymph nodes 0.827 2.286 0.292–17.864 0.43 None
Approach
Transvaginal 0.186 1.205 0.619–2.343 0.583 None
Transabdominal −0.347 0.707 0.354–1.408 0.324 None
Operator
Gynecological oncologist −0.758 0.469 0.241–0.912 0.026 Negative
Ultrasound gynecologist 1.192 3.294 1.465–7.408 0.004 Positive
Ultrasound radiologist −0.243 0.753 0.324–1.750 0.51 None
CT-guide −0.053 0.949 0.111–8.080 0.962 None