Table 1.
Patient ID | Gender | Age (yr) | Clinic | No. of electrodes analyzed | Hemisphere | Regions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 31 | Zürich | 25 | L + R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
2 | F | 33 | Bern | 17 | R | CTX, ENT, HIP |
3 | F | 29 | Zürich | 34 | L + R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
4 | F | 30 | Zürich | 30 | L + R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
5 | M | 56 | Zürich | 28 | L + R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
6 | M | 42 | Zürich | 20 | L | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
7 | M | 34 | Zürich | 37 | L + R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
8 | F | 45 | Bern | 24 | L | CTX, ENT, HIP |
9 | M | 29 | Zürich | 28 | L + R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
10 | M | 27 | Zürich | 19 | R | CTX, ENT, HIP, AMY |
11 | M | 32 | Bern | 8 | L | CTX, HIP |
aWe collected data from a total of 270 electrodes from 11 patients, with a median of 25 electrodes per patient and minimum and maximum of 8 and 37 electrodes, respectively. For each patient, we report gender, age, the hospital where the data were collected, the number of electrodes used for our analyses, the hemisphere(s) where the electrodes were implanted, and the regions sampled from the retained electrodes.