Skip to main content
. 2023 May 17;43(20):3696–3707. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1941-22.2023

Table 4.

Pairwise comparisons of spectral exponents among the four ROIs in the two analyzed frequency ranges (20-35 Hz and 80-150 Hz)a

Comparison df t (20-35 Hz) p (20-35 Hz) t (80-150 Hz) p (80-150 Hz)
CTX-ENT 192 2.557 0.054 1.551 0.408
CTX-HIP 198 12.421 4.34 × 10−14 −14.214 4.31 × 10−14
CTX-AMY 184 11.409 5.35 × 10−14 1.631 0.363
ENT-HIP 82 7.591 3.63 × 10−12 −12.321 4.35 × 10−14
ENT-AMY 68 7.564 4.27 × 10−12 0.195 0.997
HIP-AMY 74 0.608 0.929 11.650 4.90 × 10−14

aThe first column lists each of the six pairwise comparisons, the second one the relative degrees of freedom (df) of the test, the third and fourth ones the t values and p values of the post hoc t test for the 20-35 Hz range, respectively, and the last two columns the t values and p values for the 80-150 Hz range, respectively. All pairs of cortical-limbic areas have significant differences in their 20-35 Hz exponent, while the difference between temporal and entorhinal cortex is slightly below significance threshold. For the 80-150 Hz range, only the comparisons between hippocampus and the other areas are significant because of the very steep slope of hippocampal electrodes in the high-γ range. The spectral exponent values are computed through a mixed-effects model with a patient-specific random effect. p values are corrected for multiple comparisons via the Tukey range test.