Skip to main content
. 2023 May 19;10:304. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02220-0

Table 4.

Top18 genes based on experimental design.

gene_symbol sum_score_h ensgid mouse_ensgid
FST 94.7538168 ENSG00000134363 ENSMUSG00000021765
ARRDC4 67.8910773 ENSG00000140450 ENSMUSG00000042659
DEPP1 63.3306733 ENSG00000165507 ENSMUSG00000048489
PNPLA5 55.1928157 ENSG00000100341 ENSMUSG00000018868
FADS2 39.3079891 ENSG00000134824 ENSMUSG00000024665
FASN 34.9093403 ENSG00000169710 ENSMUSG00000025153
ERBB3 32.1739147 ENSG00000065361 ENSMUSG00000018166
YPEL3 30.926969 ENSG00000090238 ENSMUSG00000042675
PCK1 29.4629409 ENSG00000124253 ENSMUSG00000027513
MID1IP1 27.9817927 ENSG00000165175 ENSMUSG00000008035
LPIN2 27.1569665 ENSG00000101577 ENSMUSG00000024052
ATG2A 24.6063739 ENSG00000110046 ENSMUSG00000024773
ABCA9 24.3030494 ENSG00000154258 ENSMUSG00000041797
OCLN 23.7841083 ENSG00000197822 ENSMUSG00000021638
GRB7 23.4696009 ENSG00000141738 ENSMUSG00000019312
ANGPTL8 23.4366564 ENSG00000130173 ENSMUSG00000047822
HSD17B11 22.3194899 ENSG00000198189 ENSMUSG00000029311
NR1I3 20.2573204 ENSG00000143257 ENSMUSG00000005677

Top 18 genes based on consistent differential expression across different conditions (abs(“sum of sign”) in treated vs. CTR for human and mouse conditions >8) ranked by differential expression in human data set (sum_score_h = abs(sum(LogRatio * -log10padj across conditions).