Skip to main content
Materials Today Bio logoLink to Materials Today Bio
. 2023 May 6;20:100660. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100660

Functionalization of biomimetic mineralized collagen for bone tissue engineering

Xiujie Zhu a, Chenyu Wang b, Haotian Bai a, Jiaxin Zhang a, Zhonghan Wang a, Zuhao Li a, Xin Zhao a, Jincheng Wang a, He Liu a,
PMCID: PMC10199226  PMID: 37214545

Abstract

Mineralized collagen (MC) is the basic unit of bone structure and function and is the main component of the extracellular matrix (ECM) in bone tissue. In the biomimetic method, MC with different nanostructures of neo-bone have been constructed. Among these, extra-fibrous MC has been approved by regulatory agencies and applied in clinical practice to play an active role in bone defect repair. However, in the complex microenvironment of bone defects, such as in blood supply disorders and infections, MC is unable to effectively perform its pro-osteogenic activities and needs to be functionalized to include osteogenesis and the enhancement of angiogenesis, anti-infection, and immunomodulation. This article aimed to discuss the preparation and biological performance of MC with different nanostructures in detail, and summarize its functionalization strategy. Then we describe the recent advances in the osteo-inductive properties and multifunctional coordination of MC. Finally, the latest research progress of functionalized biomimetic MC, along with the development challenges and future trends, are discussed. This paper provides a theoretical basis and advanced design philosophy for bone tissue engineering in different bone microenvironments.

Keywords: Mineralized collagen, Biomimetic, Functionalization, Bioactive factors, Osteogenesis, Bone tissue repair

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

  • Recent developments in the preparation strategies and biological performance of MC were comprehensively reviewed.

  • The multi-functionalized programs of MC were summarized.

  • Two major issues: improving the osteogenic property and versatile coordination potential of MC were discussed.

  • Limitations, challenges, future trends of more coordinated and multifunctional MC composites were highlighted.

1. Introduction

Natural bone is a mineralized hard tissue, consisting of an extracellular matrix (ECM) and bone progenitor cells, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and bone cells. Embedded therein [1] (Fig. 1). The ECM is composed of organic-inorganic composite materials with mineralized collagen (MC) fibers and a complex hierarchical structure. Calcium phosphate, mainly composed of hydroxyapatite (HA), is the principal inorganic component of vertebrate bones, that constitutes nearly the 65% of bone weight [2]. HA has a hexagonal crystal system, which has a flexible and stable structure and composition, allowing the substitution of a variety of metal ions [[3], [4], [5]]. Impure ions, such as carbonate, sodium, and magnesium, can replace phosphate and hydroxyl sites [[6], [7], [8]], resulting in poor crystallization, calcium deficiency, and carbonization of the HA [9]. Organic components account for approximately 30% of bone weight [10], among which type I collagen is the most abundant in bone tissue. The triple helix structure of collagen I is usually heterotrimeric and composed of two identical a1(I) chains and one a2(I) chain. Individual triple helix molecules of collagen undergo self-assembly to form fibrils, and the ordered arrangement forms an observable periodicity known as the D-band, measuring 67 ​nm with a gap between two consecutive collagen molecules measuring 36 ​nm, hence the name, “gap region” [11]. Additionally, collagen fibers provide more nucleation sites for apatite crystals to aggregate [12,13], which guides the growth of mineral crystals and aligns them along the long axis of the fiber, resulting in a larger particle size [14]. MC is assembled by the orderly deposition of nanohydroxyapatite (nHAP) across the collagen Iorganic matrix, and is the most prominent level in the complex hierarchical structure of natural bone. MC provides the nanostructure base for the excellent mechanical and biological properties of bone [15]. According to how the HA is distributed relative to the collagen fibrils, MC can be divided into intra-fibrous MC (IMC) and extra-fibrous MC (EMC) [16]. IMC minerals are deposited within the collagen matrix, while EMC minerals are randomly deposited on the surface.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The multiscale structure of bone [1]. Reproduced with permission [1]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.

Throughout the human life cycle, bone tissue continues to remodel to adapt to mechanical stress and maintain skeletal tissue integrity. Minor bone defects can heal by themselves through bone reconstruction, while large traumatic injuries and defects caused by tumors, congenital diseases, and infectious diseases usually require the intervention of surgery and bone substitutes [17]. Autologous and allogeneic bone are common alternative materials to aid the healing of bone defects. However, the sources of autologous bone are limited and are prone to infection-related complications at the sampling site following transplantation. In addition, the use of bone allografts is not widespread in clinical practice due to the risks of infection and immune rejection [18,19]. Bone tissue engineering is an innovative approach to repairing and regenerating bone tissue, and a significant advancement in this field is the use of autologous bone replacement. Thus, it is imperative to identify suitable alternatives or substitutes to bone transplants.

The hierarchical structure of bone, consisting of nine levels, provides the skeletal system with the ability to bear weight and withstand mechanical stresses [20]. Suitable alternatives or substitutes for bone transplants should have similar mechanical strength and degradation rates to natural bone, while also mimicking the composition and structure of the extracellular matrix (ECM), and creating a microenvironment that is conducive to the growth of cells and tissues [[21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]]. Biomimetic materials, such as MC, are engineered to mimic the first two levels of this hierarchy - the chemical composition and structural elements [27]. They possess excellent biocompatibility, biodegradability, low antigenicity, and compositional and structural flexibility, which promote adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of pre-osteoblasts or stem cells in vitro, as well as cell migration ratios [21,[28], [29], [30], [31]]; enhances osteogenesis and angiogenesis in vivo; and promotes the repair of bone defects and the osseointegration of implants [[31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. Compared with pure collagen, HA, and tricalcium phosphate (TCP) bone scaffold materials, MC can better promote osteogenic differentiation, induce ECM secretion and mineralization, stimulate angiogenesis, and ultimately promote osteogenesis [24,28,[37], [38], [39], [40], [41]]. At present, there are numerous MC products composed of collagen/hydroxyapatite (COL/HA), some of which have been commercialized and approved by regulatory agencies for clinical application [42]. In terms of repairing minor bone defects and bone regeneration, MC has virtually achieved the same effect as autologous bone [43,44]. However, for the repair of larger and more complex bone defects, MC materials with better biomimetic properties, and stronger functionality is often required, which is a hotspot of research for MC bone replacement materials. In principle, if only the structure and morphology of MC are changed, the biological-enhancing effects of these materials are limited. To enhance the function of MC, it is often necessary to introduce additional therapeutic stimuli (e.g. cells, growth factors, bioactive elements, drugs.), rapidly promote the deposition of new bone, and ensure the formation of an adequate vascular network to achieve rapid regeneration of endogenous tissue at the injured site [22,[45], [46], [47], [48]].

Currently, research on MC has progressed from pure and composite biological materials to multifunctional coordination materials that can incorporate specific functional cells, bioactive factors, and drugs for enhanced therapeutic efficacy (Scheme 1). Existing reviews on MC mainly focus on the mechanism of biomineralization, classical and non-classical crystallization theories, in vitro mineralization of collagen, and preparation of the MC scaffolds and MC [15,16,[49], [50], [51]]. The construction of more coordinated and multifunctional MC composites for the repair of complex bone defects are a current research hotspot, with a growing number of related studies. We present the preparation strategies and biological performance of MC. We then summarize the multi-functionalized programs of MC, and subsequently focus on two major issues: improving the osteogenic property and versatile coordination potential of MC. Finally, we review related studies, discuss the current problems of MC materials, and provide an outlook for future development trends of more coordinated and multifunctional MC composites. This will provide an advanced treatment strategy and theoretical basis for the application of MC in large or complex bone defects.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Schematic illustration of functional MC synthesis strategies, modification, and some of the active factors and cellular aspects that take part in the bone repair processes in each stage.

2. Biomimetic collagen mineralization

The hierarchical structure and chemical composition of native bone tissue have been described earlier to further our knowledge and understanding of MC. Here, we will focus on advanced strategies for preparing MC with different nanostructures (as shown in Fig. 2) and explore their biological functions.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Common methods used to prepare MC with different nanostructures and the corresponding transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images. (A) The preparation process of EMC by classical ion-mediated crystallization strategy. (B) The preparation of IMC by procollagen 1 intact N-terminal (PINP) pathway. (C) The preparation process of hierarchical, intrafibrillarly MC (HIMC) by dual biomimetic analog-based bottom-up strategy.

2.1. Fabrication of MC with different nanostructures

Type I collagen, minerals, and non-collagen analogs (NCP) are the three basic elements for the preparation of MC [15]. Based on the differences in minerals, the preparation of MC can be divided into two methods: direct mineral addition and in situ mineralization [49]. The former is described as directly adding the minerals to the collagen solution. Then, the MC scaffold is prepared by electrospinning, freeze-drying, or coating methods. Finally, MC, which mimics natural bone matrix in composition and structure, is obtained. This is the simplest method for the preparation of MC. During in situ mineralization, the calcium and phosphate ions are introduced into the collagen solution instead of mineral crystals, or a pre-formed collagen scaffold is immersed in a solution containing both mineral ions. In situ deposition is a research hotspot in the preparation of MC, and MC with nanostructures similar to natural bone has been successfully prepared [[52], [53], [54], [55]]. In situ deposition contains a variety of MC preparation strategies, and different strategies provide diverse forms of I-col binding with minerals, which have been comprehensively described by Li et al. [49]. Here, we introduce the preparation methods of EMC, IMC, and HIMC, which has been well investigated. This will further facilitate our understanding of the nanostructure and function of MC.

Classical ion-mediated crystallization strategy (CIMC) is the most common method to prepare EMC [[56], [57], [58], [59]]. The collagen solution is mixed with a mineralization solution containing calcium and phosphate ions, the pH is then adjusted to 7.4 to produce a neutral solution, and the EMC is obtained by incubation at 37 ​°C for a period of time without external force. In this process, the self-assembly process of collagen fibers and mineralization occurs simultaneously. However, the amorphous calcium phosphate formed during the process is often too large to penetrate into the collagen fibers. As a result, larger calcium phosphate particles only attach to the surface of the collagen. This process is simple and easy to manipulate, but it is difficult to replicate the nanostructures of natural bone.

With the growing interest in biomineralization processes, polymer-induced liquid-precursor pathway (PILP) [60] strategies have received much attention. On the basis of CIMC [61], acidic polymers (i.e., NCP analogs, also known as isolation analogs, such as polyacrylic acid [PAA] and polyaspartic acid [PAsP]) are introduced into a supersaturated mineralization solution to bind and isolate calcium ions, delay crystal nucleation and growth, form stable and highly hydrated amorphous precursors, and prevent amorphous calcium phosphate precursors from aggregating and automatically transforming into apatite before entering the collagen fiber gap [62,63]. Thus, a continuous apatite band is formed inside the collagen fiber, and IMC is obtained [55,[64], [65], [66]].

Inspired by the dual function of matrix phosphoproteins in the process of biological mineralization [67], some researchers have introduced polyphosphates—such as polyethylene phosphonic acid, sodium trimetaphate (STMP), and sodium tripolyphosphate (TPP)—into the mineralization system on the basis of the PILP strategy as another NCP analog (also known as template analog). This is considered to be the dual biomimetic analog strategy (DBA), whereby polyphosphate is capable of efficiently binding with collagen fibers via electrostatic interactions, inhibit the continuous growth of apatite in the overlapping area, and form an in-fiber MC with hierarchical apatite structure of natural bone tissue. Some authors refer to this as HIMC. TEM analysis of HIMC reveals parallel ribbon-like particles aligned with the long axes of the collagen fibrils [23,52,[68], [69], [70], [71]]. The regulation of biomimetic mineralization processes by NCP analogs is a key step to reproducing the nanostructures of natural bone. Recent studies have demonstrated that periodic fluid shear stress (FSS) can replace polyacrylic acid (PAA) and induce highly-arranged IMC and HIMC in the presence of TPP [72,73]. Moreover, periodic FSS has been shown to improve the hydrophilicity, enzymatic stability, and crystal conversion of mineralized collagen [74]. In addition, other substances such as polyamide dendritics [75,76], sodium alginate [77], chitosan [21,53], sodium citrate [78], succinic acid [79], alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [80], and osteopontin (OPN) [81] have also been found to regulate the process of biomimetic mineralization in vitro. Moreover, some specially modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles and hollow mesoporous zirconia nanocapsules can realize the loading and delivery of ACP [54,82] in the preparation of IMC. In general, the direct mineral addition method and the CIMC strategy are simple and time-savings, and are commonly used in bone tissue engineering studies. Biomineralized hard tissues, such as bones and teeth, possess exceptional mechanical properties due to their unique architecture and hierarchically arranged nanostructures [83,84]. MC fabricated by the PILP or DBA strategies have a similar nanostructure to natural bone tissue and exhibit better mechanical properties and bioactivity compared to traditional MC. However, the preparation process is complicated and time-consuming.

2.2. Bioactivity of MC with different nanostructures

Variations in preparation methods, material sources, and processing parameters can lead to changes in the nanostructure of MC [74]. These changes, in turn, affect the mechanical properties, degradability, and bone-inducing ability of MC both in vitro and in vivo. Factors such as cell proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, focal adhesion, macrophage polarization, host MSC recruitment, new bone generation, and capillary formation can be impacted. Different types of nanostructures can have varying effects on these factors, with IMC and HIMC demonstrating greater similarity to natural bone than other nanostructures (Table 1) [23,52,85]. The nanostructures and degradation properties are similar between HIMC and natural bone, and HIMC is capable of regulating stem cell recruitment and promoting osteogenic differentiation by providing an optimized microenvironment, which facilitates the growth of new bone.

Table 1.

Properties of MC with different nanostructures.

Experimental group Control group Cells or animal model Major findings Reference
HIMC EMC; collagen MG 63 HIMC possesses better mechanical and biological properties, specifically cell proliferation, differentiation, focal adhesion, and cytoskeletal arrangement. [86]
HIMC Collagen; EMC MC3T3-E1 Pure collagen scaffolds had the highest rate of proliferation. [71]
EMC HA hMSCs Promoted cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs. [40]
IMC Collagen hMSCs Both support proliferation, osteogenic differentiation, and mineralization of hMSCs, with IMC having a more pronounced positive effect. [87]
IMC β-TCP, collagen Critical-sized rodent mandibular defect model Activate more bone-forming cells and stimulates more vascular tissue ingrowth. Induces ECM secretion and mineralization of rBMSCs. [24]
IMC EMC THP-1, critical-sized rodent mandibular defect model Promotes more new bone formation and had more M2- like macrophages. Highly express IL-10 and arginase-1. [88]
HIMC EMC Critical-sized rodent mandibular defect model, THP-1, hBMSCs Recruits host MSCs and promotes endogenous bone regeneration by immunomodulation of macrophage polarization through IL-4. [31]
IMC EMC, HA Critical-sized bone defect in the rat femur Enhances bone regeneration via activation of the Wnt signaling pathway. [33]
EMC Collagen RAW264.7 Downregulates inflammation and innate immunity. Upregulates nucleosome assembly, megakaryocyte differentiation, and chromatin assembly. [38]
IMC EMC BMSC Promotes new bone generation and capillary formation. [89]
IMC ​+ ​Ti EMC ​+ ​Ti, Critical-sized bone defect in the rat femur Promotes bone regeneration and osseointegration. [32]

HCM, Hypoxic conditioned medium; EMC, Extra-fibrous mineralized collagen; IMC, Intra-fibrous mineralized collagen; HIMC, Hierarchical, intrafibrillarly mineralized collagen; hMSC, Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; BMSC, bony marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

HIMC has better biocompatibility and osteogenic activity in vivo and in vitro than EMC and IMC [90] (Fig. 3). HIMC and IMC have significantly increased Young's elasticity compared with EMC, which significantly promotes the adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, and cytoskeletal arrangement of MG63 ​cells, MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts, and mesenchymal stem cells, and promotes the expression of osteogenic-related genes. Finally, HIMC and IMC can significantly promote new bone formation and bone defects repair [21,31,86,90,91].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of MC with different nanostructures. (A) Nanotopography (a–c) and nanomechanical (d–f) properties of MC with different nanostructures. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of HIMC (a), IMC (b) and EMC (c). Corresponding atomic force microscopy property maps and section analyses of Young's modulus of parts a–c, respectively. (B) rBMSC morphology (a′-c') after 1 ​d of culturing on the a) HIMC, b) IMC, and c) EMC. Cell morphology quantified for d′) the number of branch points and e′) the cell area in each group. f′) Cell viability and g′) quantitative results of ALP. (C) Representative HE staining images of mandibular defect areas in each group. (C) Micro-CT images of mandibular defect areas in each group. ∗α ​< ​0.05 versus HIMC; #α ​< ​0.05 versus IMC. Reproduced with permission [90]. Copyright 2016, John Wiley & Sons.

IMC can also promote the expression of the osteoprotegerin (OPG) gene in HMSCs, inhibit the generation of osteoclasts, and then affect bone metabolism [37]. Filling MC around titanium implants or in 3D printed porous titanium alloy scaffolds can promote osseointegration [32,36]. Moreover, the application of IMC leads to better osseointegration compared with EMC. One study found that IMC significantly promotes bone regeneration by activating the Wnt signaling pathway (related factors Wnt5a, β-catenin, and Axin2), and guides the early process of bone regeneration by promoting the expression of genes related to inflammation, immune response, bone development, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and Wnt signaling pathways [33]. Compared with HA, EMC can promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs through osteoblast differentiation and skeletal system development pathways, and facilitate the expression of osteogenic-related genes, such as BMP-2, COL1A1, and CTSK [40].

3. Recombination patterns of MC and active factors

The method of binding of the active factors and MC not only affects the sustained release effect of active factors, but also affects the biological activity. In turn, the addition of active factors may also affect the content and crystal morphology of HA in MC, as well as the nanostructure and degradation of MC. By reviewing past studies, we divided the binding modes of active factors and mineralized collagen into four categories: adsorption onto MC by immersion; binding to MC after surface modification; mixing with raw materials of MC; and polymer encapsulate (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Loading strategies of active factors on MC. (A) Highly efficient loading of active factor (AF) into MC by immersing in AF solution. (B) Heparin-modified surface of MC develops an affinity for AF. (C) AF was loaded onto MC scaffolds, and polymer was introduced into the scaffolds by injection or mixing. (D) AF was mixed with the raw materials of MC to form functionalized mineralized collagen (FMC). FMCS, functionalized MC scaffolds; FMC, functionalized MC; AF, active factors.

3.1. Adsorption onto MC by immersion

MC is a loose and porous nanobiomaterial and has a high surface area favorable for the adsorption of proteins or drug substances. In vivo, MC has the ability to naturally absorb and enrich BMP-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [92,93]. Nano-HA is the main component of MC and is able to adsorb many proteins and other molecules, such as drugs and ions [94]. Ca2− and PO43− are protein-binding sites on the surface of CA-P, which provide the main driving force for protein adsorption [95,96], and interact with –OH, -NH2, and –COOH groups of growth factors by hydrogen bonds or electrostatic interaction [97,98]. The adsorption ability of drugs on MC may be related to the electrostatic energy of HA [99] and its chelation ability with calcium phosphate [100]. The C-plane surface of HA is negatively charged and the amino group of vancomycin is positively charged after protonation [101], so it can be adsorbed on HA [102]. Bisphosphonates (BPS) can specifically bind to HA substrates through stable bidentate structural connections formed by chelation between phosphonic acid groups and calcium ions [103,104]. R1 and R2 groups derived from quaternary carbon branches of BPS can also bind to HA through hydroxyl groups or hydrogen bonds, further increasing the binding affinity between them [105,106]. These distinct properties make MC an ideal drug delivery system for long-term controlled delivery of active factors (AFs) to promote bone tissue repair [[107], [108], [109], [110]].

Impregnation adsorption is a common strategy for loading growth factors (such as rhBMP-2, VEGF, antibiotics, etc.) onto MC. Typically, it involves an initial burst release followed by gradual and sharp cumulative release. The burst release provides sufficient stimulation for cell proliferation and affects osteogenic differentiation in the early stage [111,112]. However, it should be noted that the higher initial burst release has the potential to shorten the release time and reduce the effect of the drug. This strategy has a simple process and minor effect on protein activity, which can minimize the complexity of structural design, reduce the manufacturing and regulatory burden related to development, and facilitate clinical translation [112].

3.2. Binding to MC after surface modification

Surface modification improves the surface activity of biomaterials and enables the AF to form a stable binding to biomaterials. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan is a key component of the bone ECM, and its functional component, glycosaminoglycan heparin, is a linear polysaccharide that can promote the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells cultured in vitro [113]. Heparin is capable of binding specifically to various AFs, including growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and additional signaling molecules, and stabilizing them in materials to regulate their activity [114,115]. Biomaterial surfaces have been modified with heparin or heparan sulfate-mimetic molecules to control the release of the heparin-binding growth factor [113,[116], [117], [118], [119], [120]]. In the sustained release process in vitro, heparin-modified MC can achieve a higher sustained and controlled release of AFs compared with non-heparin-modified MC [102,119]. The rate of AF release can be regulated by changing the amount of heparin incorporation and the modification methods [119].

Compared with fresh VEGF, the biological activity of VEGF sustained release from heparin-free modified MC was decreased, while the biological activity of VEGF sustained release from heparin-modified materials remained unchanged or was even enhanced [119]. When two or more bioactive factors of loaded heparin modified MC, the modification was generally accompanied by the initial sudden release of bioactive factors, followed by a slow release [118,121], and the sustained release process lasted for more than 6 weeks, which was considerably longer than in hydrogel [118,122]. Single and mixed factors show different release kinetics curves after loading, perhaps because different factors compete for free binding sites on the scaffold, and the binding efficiency of single factors is reduced by the elevated protein content in the mixture of bioactive factors. Therefore, the binding and release of AFs not only depends on the chemical interaction between them and the scaffold but also the interaction among the active factors [121].

In summary, functionalization of MC can be achieved through heparin modification and growth factor loading. The specific binding between heparin and AFs leads to a higher sustained release of the AF, while maintaining or enhancing its biological activity. Additionally, PDA's strong adhesion properties can be utilized to load AF onto biomaterials as an adhesive polymeric bridge. This approach has been used to create a bio-functionalized composite scaffold for osteonecrosis therapy that promotes osteo-conduction, angiogenesis, and a favorable metabolic microenvironment [123].

3.3. Polymer encapsulate

Prolonged-term retention and controlled release of AFs in bone defects is a critical prerequisite to ensure the osteogenic activity of bone repair materials [124]. There is a risk of uncontrolled release of growth factor (GF) and leakage to other areas of the body after the MC with adsorbed GF by immersion is implanted in the body [125]. The polymers have excellent bioactivity and biodegradability, and can be processed into injectable hydrogels [126,127], microcapsules [128], and microspheres [[129], [130], [131], [132]] with certain mechanical strength. By surrounding the AF surface with biodegradable materials, we can regulate the release thereof [48,133], and the sequential release of AFs can be realized. Different polymers have been shown to have different delivery effects on AFs. For example, poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) can release rhBMP-2 better than alginate [134], while alginate can realize the space-time controlled release of VEGF and maintain biological activity for a long time [[135], [136], [137]]. Furthermore, by incorporating magnesium particles into PLLA microspheres, the release of BMP-2 can be manipulated, achieving spatiotemporal co-release of magnesium and BMP-2 from the microspheres [132]. Functionalized mineralized collagen (FMC) can be obtained by injecting active factor (AF)-loaded hydrogel into MC composite or mixing AF-loaded microspheres with MC raw material. FMC composites can slowly release signaling factors in a humid environment in vivo, form a concentration gradient around the implant material, stimulate the directional migration of hBMSCs to the center of the scaffold, complete the recruitment of cells, and accelerate the healing of bone defects by promoting angiogenesis to provide oxygen and nutrition [127].

The sustained release process of AFs generally involves a combined diffusion/degradation mechanism [110,138]. Diffusion is regulated by the interaction of the materials with drug molecules, such as hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions [139]. The gradual degradation of MC ensures the continuous and local release of AFs in the scaffold structure [140]. It should be noted that the invasion of bone related cells caused by some AFs accelerates the degradation of MC [111]. Alginate and hyaluronic acid hydrogels are able to delay the initial burst release of VEGF and prolong the release, and the introduction of heparin further enhances the retention of VEGF, with an approximately linear release of VEGF within 28 days [126]. In addition, both the pH of the microenvironment and the material concentration could alter the kinetics of AF release by affecting the interaction between the drug and the material or the solubility of the material [141].

3.4. Mixing with raw materials of MC

Mixing active ingredients (such as growth factors, inorganic metal ions, and drugs) and raw materials of MC to create functionalized scaffolds is another common loading strategy. RhBMP-2 has superior stability in an acidic environment [142,143], and can bind to HA through non-covalent bonds [97,99]. During preparation of MC, rhBMP-2 is added to a COL/HA slurry and the MC scaffold prepared by freeze-drying supports the controlled release of proteins, which attenuates the burst release, prolongs the release, and maintains the biological activity [48,144]. In addition, the polyglutamic acid residue modification of GFs can provide an accumulated negative charge, which is conducive to electrostatic binding with positively charged HA, and significantly improves the binding efficiency of AFs and MC [145,146]. Compared with the impregnation adsorption strategy, the incorporation of AFs in the MC preparation process makes the loading amount of drugs more controllable and can weaken the initial burst release, but various physical and chemical factors in the preparation process may affect the activity of the drugs [147].

HA in natural bone contains many doped cations or anions, which replace calcium or phosphate in the crystal lattice [148]. Compared with GFs, inorganic metal elements are inexpensive, relatively stable, and not easily inactivated. Some inorganic metal elements (such as strontium, zinc, iron, manganese, magnesium, and silver) are incorporated into MC materials to imitate the basic components of mammalian bones, which can improve the osteoinductivity of MC or sustain and anti-infective capacity [16,[149], [150], [151], [152], [153], [154], [155]]. The incorporation of inorganic metal elements has a significant effect on the degradation rate of materials, HA content, and microstructure and crystal morphology, but has an insignificant effect on the biomimetics mineralization process and the mechanical properties and pore structure of MC [152,153,[155], [156], [157], [158].

4. Enhancing osteogenic activity of MC

Osteogenic performance is an effective index to evaluate bone replacement materials in bone defect repair, reconstruction, and tissue regeneration. Here, we elaborate upon the aspects of MC loaded with cells, GFs, drugs, and inorganic metal elements. (Table 2).

Table 2.

Enhancement of the osteogenic activity of MC.

Classification of MC Synthetic strategy Active factors Loading strategy Cells or animal model Major findings Reference
HIMC DBA Iron, manganese Mixing Calvarial defect model in rats Promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and bone regeneration loaded with fresh bone marrow cells. [152]
EMC CIMC GAG, BMP-2 Mixing BMSC, Parietal defect in rabbits Induces healing of cranial defects without addition of expanded stem cells or exogenous growth factors. [47]
EMC CIMC GAG Mixing hMSCs Activates the Wnt and mechanotransduction pathways and promotes osteogenesis. [159]
EMC CIMC GAG, zinc Mixing pASCs Promotes successful growth and pro-osteogenic capacity of pASCs. [155]
MC DMA β-tricalcium phosphate, BMP-2 Mixing; immersing Male beagle dogs, Saddle-type alveolar defects HAp/TCP/Col with 0.2 ​mg/ml rhBMP-2 manifested more and faster new bone formation with better implant stability. [160]
MC DMA rhBMP-2 Polymer encapsulate MC3T3-E1, critical-sized calvarial defects in rats Enhanced pro-osteogenic effect in vitro and in vivo. [134]
HIMC DBA hUCMSC hUCMSC; femoral condyle defect models in rabbits Promotes healing speed of bone defects in vivo. [23]

DMA, direct mineral addition method; CIMC, Classical Ion-Mediated Crystallization Strategy; DBA, Dual Biomimetic Analog Strategy; PILP, Polymer-Induced Liquid-Precursor Pathway; hUCMSC, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell; GAG, Glycosaminoglycan; pASCs, porcine adipose-derived stem cells.

4.1. loaded with osteoblast-related cells

As well as the ability to replicate, stem cells have multidirectional differentiation potential. Compared with stem cells, the proliferation and differentiation ability of osteoblasts is insufficient. In the process of bone repair, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can migrate to the bone defect and differentiate into osteoblasts, secreting bone matrix components and playing an important role in bone regeneration [161]. Stem cell-based tissue engineering has great potential to regenerate damaged tissue. MC has superior biocompatibility and can be used as a cell carrier; The combination of both work together to significantly promote bone regeneration in vivo [23]. In a study of skull bone defect repair models in miniature pigs, compared with the cell-loaded HA scaffold, autologous periodontal ligament stem cell (PDLSC)-loaded IMC showed better bone regeneration and the deposition of large amounts of new bone with nanostructures. Furthermore, nanomechanical properties and blood vessels similar to natural bone were observed, and the expressions of Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and transcription factor Osterix were high [22]. Autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (ADMSCs)-loaded nano-hydroxyapatite-collagen-polylactic acid (NHAC-PLA) achieved similar fusion effect as autologous iliac bone transplantation (ACB) in the process of spinal fusion in rabbits [162]. Despite the promising potential of stem cells, there is currently no consensus on their optimal conditions for use. Therefore, the establishment of uniform standards and requirements for the use of stem cells is crucial for their development and application.

4.2. Addition of GFs

MC is an effective carrier of various GFs, which release a variety of signal factors in vivo to attract and stimulate surrounding host tissue cells and promote the inward growth of osteoblasts and the formation of the vascular network in the scaffold, ultimately promoting osteogenesis [108,110,112,144,145,163]. Of the bone GFs discovered, BMP-2 is the strongest growth factor in promoting bone formation. RhBMP −2 has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and applied to clinical treatment of various orthopedic and stomatological diseases [164]. However, there is growing evidence suggesting that the excessive dosage application of rhBMP-2 and the uncontrolled and non-targeted delivery after implantation lead to a series of complications [[164], [165], [166], [167], [168]]. Some researchers have incorporated rhBMP-2 30 times lower than the clinical gold standard, INFUSE®, during MC preparation. In trials, this was not accompanied by an obvious initial burst release in vitro, and only about 25% rhBMP-2 was released in 21 days, which significantly improved the degree of skull defect healing without bone abnormalities or the resorption of the adjacent bones [144]. Low concentrations of rhBMP-2 have also shown strong osteogenic ability in large animal models [160] (Fig. 5). MC scaffolds were loaded with PLGA-encapsulated rhBMP-2 particles, which were shown to continuously release bioactive rhBMP-2 and exhibit exceptional bone regeneration and healing properties in vivo [134].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

(A) (a) Saddle-type bone defect with dental implant insertion. (b) Lateral view following the placement of HAp/TCP/Col composite and cover screw. (B) Representative 3D CT reconstruction. (C) Merged confocal microscope images of the two fluorochromes. Dotted line: original bone level [160]. Reproduced under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License [160]. Copyright 2021, John Wiley & Sons.

The functionalization effect of single growth factor is lower than that of combinations of different growth factors [169,170]. Heparin-modified MC scaffolds were loaded with different doses of BMP-2 and chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α). In vivo, SDF-1a enhanced the osteoinductive potential of the low concentrations of BMP-2, producing a regenerative potential similar to that of high-dose BMP-2, thus avoiding the adverse effects produced by excessive doses of BMP-2 [118]. BMP-2-derived peptides are peptides that retain BMP sequence inducing osteoblast differentiation. Various BMP-2-derived peptides have been designed and show significant osteoinductive ability [112,171]. In vivo, MC scaffolds loaded with BMP-2 derived peptides can control the continuous release of BMP-2 derived peptides for 15 weeks, providing continuous stimulation for bone formation and reconstruction, and achieving similar osteogenic effects to rhBMP-2 [112].

4.3. Loading of drugs

Bisphosphonates (BPS), as a representative of osteoclast inhibitors, are commonly used drugs in clinical treatment of osteoporosis and metabolic bone diseases, and can reduce bone loss caused by unloading or stress shielding [172] and have been shown to possess strong osteogenic induction capability [173,174]. The collagen/hydroxyapatite (COL/HA) materials, which were loaded with alendronate (ALN), supported the adhesion and proliferation of MC3T3-E1 [175]. In the ectopic osteogenesis model, the adsorption of rhBMP-2 and zoledronic acid (ZA) by MC increased the bone volume by six times compared with rhBMP-2 alone. That is, ZA promoted the bone formation ability of rhBMP-2 [110] (Fig. 6). Compared with the direct adsorption loading strategy, the PLGA microspheres coated with ALN are incorporated into the MC during the preparation and the composite scaffold is soaked in BMP-2 solution to produce a dual agent delivery system. This offers a method to co-deliver synthetic and anti-decomposition drugs, realizing the sequential release of BMP-2 and ALN, and to fully exploit the synergistic effect of BMP-2 and ALN, significantly promoting bone regeneration [48].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(A) Representative images of the fluorescently labeled BP (Alexa Pam 647 – red color) within both scaffold types. (B) Quantification of 14C-ZA elution from porous collagen and carbonated hydroxyapatite (CHA) scaffolds post-washing. ∗p ​< ​0.01 in comparison to CHA elution of both 1 ​μg and 2 ​μg 14C-ZA. (C) (a, b) Representative 3D CT reconstruction; (c, d) corresponding transaxial slices (stack of 50 slices) of μCT images of bone nodules resulting from each group. (D) Representative TRAP-stained histological sections of osteoclasts (stained in red) in trabecular-like structure of ectopic bone formed following 4 weeks of intramuscular implantation. The arrows indicate the stained osteoclasts. Scale bars ​= ​500 ​μm [110]. Reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License [110]. Copyright 2014, Elsevier. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Human parathyroid hormone-related peptide (osteostatin) can play a dual role in the stimulation of bone regeneration, promoting osteogenesis and suppressing osteoclastogenesis. Some researchers have loaded the pentaptide of parathyroid hormone (PThrP107-111) onto the COL/HA scaffold by chemical fixation. The composite scaffold has sustained peptide release in vitro. Functionalized scaffolds significantly promoted new bone formation [176]. In addition, collagen/poly (vinyl alcohol)/propranolol/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold (CPPH), using a 3D printing technique in vitro gradual-release propranolol, indicated that the local adrenergic receptor blockers may promote bone defect repair by stimulating osteogenesis differentiation, inhibiting osteoclast formation, and increasing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell migration [177]. Additionally, MC composite materials loaded with recombinant osteoprotegerin (OPG) can significantly reduce the maturation and resorption activity of primary osteoclasts. In a rabbit calvarial defect model, the defect area reconstructed with the composite material exhibited higher mineralization, hardness, and resistance to micro-fracture [178].

4.4. Doped inorganic metallic elements

Strontium has the dual effect of inhibiting bone resorption and promoting bone formation, and its doping in MC is a current research hotspot. Strontium promotes osteoblast differentiation by activating Ras/MAPK and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways and transcription factor Runx2 [179,180]. In addition, it interacts with membrane-bound calcium-sensing receptors [181] and affects osteoclast paracrine signaling [182]. Adding Sr into the hydroxyapatite (HA) altered its crystal lattice and resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of mineralization. However, the PILP method for synthesizing intrafibrillar minerals was not affected by Sr doping [183]. In the process of MC scaffold preparation, calcium is replaced by strontium to produce strontium-modified mineralized collagen [153], and composite materials can release strontium ions (Sr2+), and the concentration of Sr2+ released by 50% and 100% strontium-substituted scaffolds is in a range that is conducive to the dual effect of strontium on bone metabolism [153]. Strontium-modified MC significantly promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSC. After being soaked in BMP-2 solution and implanted at the bone defect site, the cross-segmented bone bridge was achieved within 6 weeks. Strontium facilitated bone regeneration in a BMP-2-mediated femoral defect model in mice and improved the mechanical properties of the bridged defect. With the increase of strontium concentration, the quality of new bone tissue is significantly improved, the number of osteoblasts and blood vessels in the tissue increased, and the number of osteoclasts decreased, playing a dual role in regulating bone metabolism [154] (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

(A) Experimental design in vivo. SEM image of a strontium-containing MC type I scaffold (a). The scaffolds were functionalized with and without rhBMP-2 and implanted into 2 ​mm bone defects of nude mice (b–d). The defects were stabilized by an external fixator (c). (B) μCT evaluation of the bone volume at the defect site. (C) The result of three-point binding stiffness. (D) Histological staining of femurs at 6 weeks after surgery. (E) Morphological scoring of the HE stained defect areas [154]. Reproduced under the Creative Commons Attribution License [154]. Copyright 2020, John Wiley & Sons.

Magnesium is one of the major ions in juvenile and nascent bone and tends to disappear in mature and aging bones [184,185]. The lack of magnesium ions in bone tissue can affect the morphology, size, and growth rate of crystals [156]. In the process of bone formation, Mg2+ can play a role in promoting the osteogenic differentiation of stem cells, promoting the adhesion and movement of osteoblasts, inhibiting osteoclasts, and regulating immunity [186], and indirectly influences bone mineral metabolism by inducing the production of nitric oxide to promote angiogenesis [187,188]. Magnesium-doped MC scaffolds simulate the composition and structure of human osteogenesis to a high degree, exhibit excellent biocompatibility [189], support the attachment and proliferation of hMSCs, and facilitate the formation of new bone and cartilage tissue [190]. In an ectopic bone model, a large amount of cancellous bone was produced within 2 weeks and gradually maturated, eventually forming new bone with lacunae and bone cells, showing faster and more efficient osteoinduction [158].

Various trace elements play a role in the process of bone regeneration in vivo, and MC doped with trace elements can significantly promote bone repair [[191], [192], [193]]. Zinc is an essential trace element, and a deficiency thereof affects bone development and is associated with the pathogenesis of osteoporosis [194,195]. Zn-doped HA/I-col material has a connected pore structure and continuous zinc ion release, which has excellent biocompatibility and can promote the osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs and the repair of bone defects [191,192]. When adding zinc to the mineralized collagen-glycosaminoglycan precursor suspension, zinc-doped composites promote the growth and osteogenic differentiation of porcine ADscs [155]. Iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) are essential trace elements in bone. Mn deficiency can weaken the activity of osteoblasts, leading to delayed osteogenic processes, bone deformation, growth inhibition, and even bone resorption [193]. Iron is a basic element in practically all organisms, which can promote reactive oxygen species production, and improve the antibacterial and osteogenic properties of iron-containing materials [196,197]. HIMC [152] incorporated with Fe2+ and Mn2+ significantly promote the adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts. Compared with pure HIMC scaffolds or commercial MC scaffolds, Fe/Mn composite HIMC scaffolds loaded with fresh bone marrow cells have better bone regeneration capability in vivo.

4.5. Additional elements

Fe2+/Fe3+ can be incorporated into HA to obtain a new superparamagnetic phase with biocompatibility and bioabsorbability [3], namely FeHA nanoparticles. In one study, magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) (such as Fe3O4 nanoparticles [198] and FeHA nanoparticles) were incorporated into MC to obtain an intelligent magnetic scaffold, which can apply mechanical stimulation to cells by external magnetic fields, and by adjusting the remote applied magnetic field, the mode and intensity of mechanical stimulation for cells can be controllable. Studies have found that, compared with static magnetic fields, mechanical stimulation with periodic magnetic fields can better promote osteogenic differentiation of MSCs [3,198]. Furthermore, adding multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) to MC can greatly enhance scaffold hardness (up to 10 times), promote bone marrow MSC proliferation and migration, enhance osteogenic differentiation, and significantly facilitate new bone formation [199]. Radially aligned MC fibers that incorporate nanosilicon (RA-MC/nSi) further promote the recruitment of host repair cells to the defect area in the skull, thereby facilitating bone regeneration [200].

5. Coordination of multifunctional MC

Bone induction and bone formation in vivo are complex and continuous processes and require the coordination of various sides, particularly for some complex bone defects. In addition to enhancing osteogenic function during the bone regeneration process, it is also important to coordinate with other functions such as angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and anti-infective properties to improve the bone microenvironment, thereby promoting regeneration and accelerating the healing processes (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multifunctional coordination of MC.

Classification of MC Synthetic strategy Active factors Loading strategy Cells or animal models Major findings Reference
HIMC PILP Antimicrobial peptides Immersing hMSCs Potent by contact killing of Gram-negative Escherichia coli and Gram-positive Streptococcus gordonii as well as cytocompatible to hMSCs. [201]
EMC CIMC GAG Mixing hMSCs, HUVEC, THP-1 Directly and indirectly influence overall osteogenic potential and mineral biosynthesis as well as angiogenic potential and differentiation of monocyte. [202]
EMC CIMC PL, HCM, ATE Chemical bonding hMSCs, HUVEC Chemically attracted hMSCs and promote the prevascular structures formation. [121]
EMC CIMC BMP-2, VEGF Immersing mandibular defect model in the rabbit Improve angiogenesis and osteogenesis. [108]
EMC CIMC rhBMP-2 Immersing hMSCs, Femoral defect in the rabbit Enhanced the osteogenic differentiation capacity of rBMSCs. Promote bone regeneration. [111]
MC DMA Zinc Silicate Mixing BMSCs, critical size rodent calvarial defect model Promotes BMSC migration, differentiation, and vessel formation. [203]

PL, Platelet-rich plasma lysate; HCM, hypoxia-conditioned medium; ATE, adipose tissue extract; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; VNC, Vancomycin hydrochloride; GNT, gentamicin sulfate.

5.1. Synergy of angiogenesis and osteogenesis

VEGF is a specific GF acting on vascular endothelial cells, which can regulate the migration, proliferation, and capillary formation of endothelial cells [145,204]. It has been found that different patterns of VEGF release appear to affect angiogenesis in different ways. The continuous release of a tiny amount of VEGF from heparin-modified MC can affect the formation of vascular structures, such as stabilizing immature vascular structures, while the sudden release of VEGF accompanied by non-heparin-modified MC seems to be more conducive in tubule formation and sprouting [113]. VEGF was encapsulated in alginate microspheres, and then mixed into MC scaffolds, which could promote the formation of tubules by promoting vascular endothelial cells in vitro, and significantly promote angiogenesis and bone regeneration in a skull defect model [135]. In addition, non-sulfurized anionic glycosaminoglycan hyaluronic acid may act synergistically with VEGF to promote angiogenesis in vivo [205]. Based on the findings of the present study, artificial VEGF mimic peptides had the same function of promoting the angiogenic as VEGF proteins [206].

The concept that enhancing mature vascularized bone regeneration by coupling osteogenesis and angiogenesis is an essential concept of biomaterial modification, which can be exerted by the dual delivery of angiogenic and osteogenic factors [108,207]. MC loaded with low doses of BMP-2 and VEGF showed superior release kinetics in vitro [163], and lead to more rapid and effective bone regeneration in vivo; the volume of new bone increased about 28 times and the area of new bone increased about seven times compared with MC without growth factors [163]. In one study, an MC scaffold was used to incorporate CS microspheres loaded with RhBMP-2. The scaffolds were then immersed in a solution of VEGF to enable the sequential release of both factors, which facilitated bone growth. Through the synergistic and additive effects of the growth factors, VEGF promoted angiogenesis initially, followed by RhBMP-2, which led to bone formation [208] (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

(A) Simple method to prepare HA/COL composite. (B) Composites are implanted into animals for four weeks after removal and observed. (C) Masson staining images of each group, four weeks after implantation. NB, deposition of new bone; M, bone-filling material; arrows refer to the new blood vessels. Reproduced with permission [208]. Copyright 2019, Elsevier.

The hypoxic conditioned medium (HCM) of hBMSC is a mixture of various signaling factors, has great potential to induce directional cell migration, and contains elevated concentrations of angiogenic factors, which can promote the formation of vascular structures [209]. HCM and alginate composite, as a central repository, integrate into the MC scaffold. The composite system was obtained after calcium crosslinking, which can slow the release signal factor and form a concentration gradient around the scaffolds, stimulating hBMSC directional migration to the center of the scaffolds, completing the recruitment of cells. Moreover, the composite system provides oxygen and nutrients for cells and accelerates the healing of bone defects by promoting angiogenesis [127]. In addition, heparin-modified MC scaffolds loaded with various concentrated mixtures of growth factors can not only play a role in promoting bone formation but also promote angiogenesis [121]. Silicate/nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen (ZS/HA/Col) scaffolds can create a favorable osteogenic microenvironment and regulate monocytes through the p38 ​MAPK pathway, promoting migration, differentiation of BMSCs, angiogenesis, and bone regeneration in vivo [203]. Additionally, some natural polymers (such as glycosaminoglycan, hyaluronic acid, and heparin) have excellent biological activity and biodegradability, and show enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties when combined with MC [47,202,[210], [211], [212], [213]].

5.2. Synergy of immunomodulation and osteogenesis

After biomaterials are implanted in the human body, a series of immune responses develop, which not only determine the fate of the biomaterials but also has an impact on the results of bone regeneration [88]. Excessive immune responses cause fibrotic encapsulation, tissue destruction, and even implant-tissue separation, rejection, and other poor prognoses [214,215]. Macrophages are the dominant cell type involved in acute and chronic inflammation and the subsequent wound healing or fibrotic response. Activated macrophages exhibit M1 (proinflammation) and M2 (tissue repair) phenotypes. The switch and balance between M1 and M2 phenotypes are needed by tissue repair, and the polarized macrophages recruit other immune cells to inflammatory sites and activate the complement and adaptive immune system by secreting different cytokines and small molecules [[216], [217], [218]]. The Ding group has conducted a series of studies on the preparation of bone immune-regulating tissue engineering scaffolds. The composite scaffold has strong immune-regulating ability, significant angiogenic capacity, and strong osteogenic ability. In vivo, it significantly promotes bone defect repair [219,220]. Biomimetic collagen is an ideal bone repair material. Its nanostructure regulates the polarization of macrophages during bone regeneration and affects the outcome of bone regeneration [88,221] (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Potential molecular mechanism of how macrophage polarization activated by MC with different nanostructures affects the process of endogenous bone regeneration.

Compared with pure collagen scaffolds, the expression of inflammatory and immune response genes associated with macrophages cultured on MC were downregulated. The expression of genes associated with cell proliferation, differentiation, tissue repair, and reconstruction were increased [38]. Researchers have found that the MC coating on the surface of titanium implants can regulate the phenotype of macrophages by triggering the integrin-related cascade pathway, thereby promoting osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells [222]. Adrenaline affects macrophage polarization regulated by MC via the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [38]. The surface roughness and the nanostructure of MC regulates the polarization of macrophages [223]. On the rough surface, macrophages tend to polarize into the inflammatory M1 phenotype and secrete inflammatory factors (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6) at high levels. While, on the smoother surface, macrophages induce polarization toward the M2 phenotype [223]. IMC and HIMC promote the polarization of M2 macrophages and increase the expression of M2-related anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-10 and arginase-1 at the cell, protein, and gene levels [31,88,221]. However, EMC mainly stimulates macrophages toward M1 polarization and expresses higher levels of the M1-related genes, including iNOS and IL-6 [31,88,224]. Other research has indicated that HIMC promotes M2 macrophage polarization though regulation of IL-4 expression and secretion, and the polarized macrophages strongly promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs and bone regeneration by secreting IL-4, but do not affect the recruitment process of MSC [31]. In addition, M2 macrophage-related small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) can promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs through the BMP2/Smad5 pathway. This increases the expression of osteoblast differentiation markers (BMP2, BGLAP, COL1, and OSX) and mineral deposition, and promotes endogenous bone regeneration [35].

5.3. Synergy between anti-infective and osteogenic

The treatment of infectious bone defects is an intractable problem to be solved in orthopedics. Systemic use of antibiotics is ineffective due to insufficient blood supply to the site of infection and increasing bacterial resistance [225]. For this reason, developing new versatile in situ bone defect repair scaffolds can effectively deal with infectious bone defects. Antibiotic-loaded MC (such as with antimicrobial peptides and some Chinese herbs) is a common strategy to achieve antibacterial function [201,[226], [227], [228]]. Directly mixing antibiotics with collagen or HA is the simplest method to prepare MC with antibacterial properties, which can achieve the effective release of active vancomycin [229]. The COL/HA electrospun fiber membrane is loaded with vancomycin and gentamicin by soaking or immersion [230], which sustains the release of drugs with antibacterial activity in high concentrations. The combined application of the two drugs has a complementary effect, and is more effective than a single administration of either agent. Furthermore, it is devoid of cellular toxicity. A gentamicin/HA/collagen bone nanocomposite is an excellent bioabsorbable anti-infective bone cavity filler without cytotoxicity, and can be used for the prevention of initial infection [231].

The adsorption, activity, and release of antibiotics on MC are affected by multiple factors. Magnesium modified mineralized collagen has excellent osteogenic properties, and antibiotics (such as vancomycin and gentamicin) loaded into magnesium modified MC composite materials by soaking or immersion were developed to improve the osteogenic and anti-infection properties. The magnesium doping leads to greater drug retention but does not affect the antibacterial activity of the drugs [227]. The binding mode of vancomycin and COL/HA material does, however, influence the drug's activity. Compared with directly incorporating vancomycin into the COL/HA electrospun liquid, vancomycin loaded COL/HA after electrospinning shows stronger antibacterial activity [147]. However, HA modification in MC does not negatively affect the sustained release of vancomycin [229] or initial release thereof [147,230]. In addition, various antibiotics have different adsorption capacities upon MC. The superior adsorption capacity of antibiotics onto MC results in more effective activity compared to antibiotics with lower adsorbability, leading to improved therapeutic outcomes in murine models of acute osteomyelitis [107] (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

(A) The amount of adsorbed antibiotic (mg) per 1 ​g of HAp/Col. N/A, not available. (B) Representative photographs of culture dishes. The translucent circles are inhibitory zones. ∗Effective inhibitory zone. (C) 3D CT reconstruction of bone holes at 4 weeks after implantation. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin staining images of the implant site at different times after implantation (scale bar: 1000 ​μm) [107]. Reproduced with permission [107]. Copyright 2019, the Authors. Published by Wiley Periodicals.

Silver ions exhibit excellent antibacterial properties by destroying bacterial cell membranes and binding microbial DNA and sulfhydryl groups of metabolic enzymes, thereby directly incorporating silver ions into various natural and synthetic polymers to optimize the antibacterial effect of materials [[232], [233], [234]]. In one study, silver nanoparticles were prepared by the interaction between tannic acid and silver nitrate, and then incorporated into a collagen matrix [235]. The composite was then immersed in simulated body fluid. Lastly, a composite MC loaded with silver nanoparticles was obtained though collagen self-assembly and mineralization. The composite exhibited good mechanical performance and antibacterial activities, and showed perfect biocompatibility to MG-63 ​cells and red blood cells [235]. In another study, silver-doped hydroxyapatite (AgHAp) was prepared by the co-precipitation method and then added to a collagen gel. Silver-doped MC was obtained after freeze-drying. This composite also has strong antibacterial properties, and the inhibition zone increased sharply with the increase in the silver concentration [236]. In addition, graphene oxide (GO) [237], antimicrobial peptide GL13K [201], and naringin [226] were introduced into mineralized collagen materials to obtain modified MC composites, which have excellent biocompatibility, enhanced osteogenic properties, and anti-infection effects (Fig. 11).

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

(A) Schematic illustration of the MC coating on titanium with the aid of metal-organic framework nanocrystals to control the release of naringin, which could enhance osseointegration and simultaneously inhibit microbial cell growth. (B) Morphological observation of MSCs on various substrates. Filopodia are indicated by white arrows [226]. Reproduced under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License [226]. Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.

6. Discussion

MC has attracted considerable attention because of the similarity to the chemical composition and/or nanostructure of natural bone tissue, and has been evaluated as a relatively common scaffold material in bone tissue engineering. There are currently many commercially available MC products that have been approved by regulatory agencies for clinical use and have demonstrated superior biological properties in bone defect repairs and regeneration. However, for complex bone defects, MC exhibits insufficient osteoinduction and poor antibacterial properties. As is well known, due to the loose and porous structure, large surface area, and inclusion of nano-HA, MC is suitable as an effective carrier for cells, various AFs, and drugs. Moreover, calcium ions in MC can be doped and replaced by various inorganic metallic ions, and impart enhanced osteogenesis, angiogenesis, immunomodulatory, and anti-infection properties to MC. The method to load AFs on MC is important and can be categorized into four categories, including the adsorption onto MC by immersing, binding to MC after surface modification, mixing with raw materials of MC, and polymer encapsulate. Therefore, the efficient and orderly release of single or multiple AFs can be achieved by using different loading methods or the combination of different loading methods, to realize the multi-functionalization of MC. In the process, attention should be paid to the influence of physical and chemical conditions on the biological activity of AFs and the influence of AFs on the degradation performance of MC, crystal morphology, nanostructures, and content of HA. When loading multiple AFs, the interaction between different factors should be noted, and this may affect the release curve and bioactivity. In the process of in situ bone tissue regeneration, functionalized MC not only acts as a support material, but also as a drug delivery system to continuously deliver AFs locally, to exert an anti-infection, immunomodulatory, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis function, and finally facilitate bone regeneration and repair various complex bone defects.

In recent years, despite the impressive progress in the study of functionalized MC materials, numerous problems remain to be solved. IMC and HIMC have excellent mechanical and biological properties compared to conventional MC. However, the biomimetic preparation process in vitro is complex, time-consuming, involves numerous variables, and a unified preparation strategy has not yet been formed, which is not favorable for the industrial production and uniform results between different studies. In addition, present research is at the stage of preparing MC with a level-2 hierarchical structure in the multilevel layered structure of bone tissue. Achieving biomimicry at higher levels of the layered structure of bone tissue becomes a formidable challenge. Strengthening the knowledge of the biomineralization process in vivo, and a precise understanding of the nature and function of collagen type I and numerous non-collagenous proteins, as well as continuously striving to improve biomimetic preparation strategies in vitro, will contribute to the successful fabrication of MC with the more intricate hierarchical structure of natural bone. MC with different nanostructures have different biological properties, and the precise mechanisms of pro-osteogenic effects involve a multitude of aspects, such as osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and osteoimmunomodulation. Future research should focus on two important areas. First, the development of more advanced biomimetic MC preparation methods. Second, the direction of future research should focus on encapsulating and precisely controlling the release of AFs using a combination of multiple AFs and loading strategies that can function collaboratively. Ultimately, the preparation of a functional MC composite system that can effectively repair bone defects of varying degrees would be a crucial consideration for future studies. We believe that by further investigating mineralization mechanisms in vivo, improving the preparation strategies for biomimetic MC in vitro, and introducing advanced drug sustained release systems, which are constantly optimized with the release of AFs, the development of a functional MC to meet the diverse needs of patients and address clinical requirements is well within reach.

Data statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

Author contributions

Xiujie Zhu: Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Chenyu Wang: Method-ology, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – review & editing. Haotian Bai: Validation, Resources, Writing – review & editing. Jiaxin Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Zhonghan Wang: Writing – review & editing. Zuhao Li: Supervision, Conceptualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing. Xin Zhao: Writing – review & editing. Jincheng Wang: Writing – review & editing. He Liu: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Role of the funding source

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82001971, 82102358 and 82202698); Scientific Development Program of Jilin Province (Grant Nos. 20200403088SF, 20220204117YY, YDZJ202201ZYTS086, 20200404202YY and 20200802008 ​GH); Program of Jilin Provincial Health Department (Grant No. 2020SC2T064 and 2020SC2T065); Project of "Medical ​+ ​X″ Interdisciplinary Innovation Team of Norman Bethune Health Science Center of Jilin University (Grant No. 2022JBGS06); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2021M701384); Bethune Plan of Jilin University (Grant No. 2022B27). Postgraduate innovation Research program of Jilin University (Grant No. 4190214223Q0)

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  • 1.Shah F.A., Thomsen P., Palmquist A. Osseointegration and current interpretations of the bone-implant interface. Acta Biomater. 2019;84:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Mori A., Hafidh M., Mele N., Yusuf R., Cerri G., Gavini E., Tozzi G., Barbu E., Conconi M., Draheim R.R., Roldo M. Sustained release from injectable composite gels loaded with silver nanowires designed to combat bacterial resistance in bone regeneration applications. Pharmaceutics. 2019:11. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11030116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tampieri A., Iafisco M., Sandri M., Panseri S., Cunha C., Sprio S., Savini E., Uhlarz M., Herrmannsdoerfer T. Magnetic bioinspired hybrid nanostructured collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds supporting cell proliferation and tuning regenerative process. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:15697–15707. doi: 10.1021/am5050967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tampieri A., D'Alessandro T., Sandri M., Sprio S., Landi E., Bertinetti L., Panseri S., Pepponi G., Goettlicher J., Bañobre-López M., Rivas J. Intrinsic magnetism and hyperthermia in bioactive Fe-doped hydroxyapatite. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:843–851. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Qi Y., Mai S., Ye Z., Aparicio C. Biomimetic fabrication and characterization of collagen/strontium hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Mater. Lett. 2020;274 doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.127982. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weiner Stephen. 1989. On Biomineralization, on Biomineralization/ [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Olszta M.J., Cheng X., Sang S.J., Kumar R., Gower L.B. Bone structure and formation: a new perspective. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2007;58:77–116. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2007.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Palmer L.C., Newcomb C.J., Kaltz S.R., Spoerke E.D., Stupp S.I. Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:4754–4783. doi: 10.1021/cr8004422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ishikawa K., Ducheyne P., Radin S. Determination of the Ca/P ratio in calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite using X-ray diffraction analysis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1993;4:165–168. doi: 10.1007/BF00120386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Niu X., Fan R., Tian F., Guo X., Li P., Feng Q., Fan Y. Calcium concentration dependent collagen mineralization. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;73:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gelse K., Pöschl E., Aigner T. Collagens--structure, function, and biosynthesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003;55:1531–1546. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nudelman F., Pieterse K., George A., Bomans P.H.H., Friedrich H., Brylka L.J., Hilbers P.A.J., de With G., Sommerdijk N.A.J.M. The role of collagen in bone apatite formation in the presence of hydroxyapatite nucleation inhibitors. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:1004–1009. doi: 10.1038/nmat2875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schwarcz H.P., Binkley D.M., Luo L., Grandfield K. A search for apatite crystals in the gap zone of collagen fibrils in bone using dark-field illumination. Bone. 2020;135 doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Katti D.R., Pradhan S.M., Katti K.S. Directional dependence of hydroxyapatite-collagen interactions on mechanics of collagen. J. Biomech. 2010;43:1723–1730. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oosterlaken B.M., Vena M.P., de G. With, in vitro mineralization of collagen. Adv. Mater. 2021;33 doi: 10.1002/adma.202004418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu L., Wei M. Biomineralization of collagen-based materials for hard tissue repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms22020944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perry C.R. Bone repair techniques, bone graft, and bone graft substitutes. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1999:71–86. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199903000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Farrington M., Matthews I., Foreman J., Richardson K.M., Caffrey E. Microbiological monitoring of bone grafts: two years' experience at a tissue bank. J. Hosp. Infect. 1998;38:261–271. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(98)90075-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bos G.D., Goldberg V.M., Zika J.M., Heiple K.G., Powell A.E. Immune responses of rats to frozen bone allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:239–246. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198365020-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reznikov N., Shahar R., Weiner S. Bone hierarchical structure in three dimensions. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:3815–3826. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang Y., Van Manh N., Wang H., Zhong X., Zhang X., Li C. Synergistic intrafibrillar/extrafibrillar mineralization of collagen scaffolds based on a biomimetic strategy to promote the regeneration of bone defects. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016;11:2053–2067. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S102844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang C., Yan B., Cui Z., Cui S., Zhang T., Wang X., Liu D., Yang R., Jiang N., Zhou Y., Liu Y. Bone regeneration in minipigs by intrafibrillarly-mineralized collagen loaded with autologous periodontal ligament stem cells. Sci. Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11155-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ye B., Luo X., Li Z., Zhuang C., Li L., Lu L., Ding S., Tian J., Zhou C. Rapid biomimetic mineralization of collagen fibrils and combining with human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells for bone defects healing. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications. 2016;68:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu S., Sun Y., Fu Y., Chang D., Fu C., Wang G., Liu Y., Tay F.R., Zhou Y. Bioinspired collagen-apatite nanocomposites for bone regeneration. J. Endod. 2016;42:1226–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao D., Zhu T., Li J., Cui L., Zhang Z., Zhuang X., Ding J. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based composite bone-substitute materials. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6:346–360. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Doyle M.E., Dalgarno K., Masoero E., Ferreira A.M. Advances in biomimetic collagen mineralisation and future approaches to bone tissue engineering. Biopolymers. 2023;114 doi: 10.1002/bip.23527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu Y., Luo D., Wang T. Hierarchical structures of bone and bioinspired bone tissue engineering. Small. 2016;12:4611–4632. doi: 10.1002/smll.201600626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Z., Du T., Gao C., Tang L., Chen K., Liu J., Yang J., Zhao X., Niu X., Ruan C. In-situmineralized homogeneous collagen-based scaffolds for potential guided bone regeneration. Biofabrication. 2022;14 doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ac8dc7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang J., Qu Y., Chen C., Sun J., Pan H., Shao C., Tang R., Gu X. Fabrication of collagen membranes with different intrafibrillar mineralization degree as a potential use for GBR. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104 doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zuo W., Yu L., Zhang H., Fei Q. Mineralized collagen scaffold bone graft accelerate the osteogenic process of HASCs in proper concentration. Regenerative Therapy. 2021;18:161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2021.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jin S.-S., He D.-Q., Luo D., Wang Y., Yu M., Guan B., Fu Y., Li Z.-X., Zhang T., Zhou Y.-H., Wang C.-Y., Liu Y. A biomimetic hierarchical nanointerface orchestrates macrophage polarization and mesenchymal stem cell recruitment to promote endogenous bone regeneration. ACS Nano. 2019;13:6581–6595. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.9b00489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Z., Zhang S., Li Z., Li S., Liu J., Zhang C. Osseointegration effect of biomimetic intrafibrillarly mineralized collagen applied simultaneously with titanium implant: a pilot in vivo study. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:637–648. doi: 10.1111/clr.13449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang Z., Li Z., Zhang C., Liu J., Bai Y., Li S., Zhang C. Biomimetic intrafibrillar mineralized collagen promotes bone regeneration via activation of the Wnt signaling pathway. Int. J. Nanomed. 2018;13:7503–7516. doi: 10.2147/ijn.S172164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zwingenberger B., Vater C., Bell R.L., Bolte J., Mehnert E., Bruenler R., Aibibu D., Zwingenberger S. Treatment of critical-size femoral bone defects with chitosan scaffolds produced by a novel process from textile engineering. Biomedicines. 2021;9 doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9081015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu A., Jin S., Fu C., Cui S., Zhang T., Zhu L., Wang Y., Shen S.G.F., Jiang N., Liu Y. Macrophage-derived small extracellular vesicles promote biomimetic mineralized collagen-mediated endogenous bone regeneration. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2020;12:33. doi: 10.1038/s41368-020-00100-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ma L., Wang X., Zhao N., Zhu Y., Qiu Z., Li Q., Zhou Y., Lin Z., Li X., Zeng X., Xia H., Zhong S., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Mao C. Integrating 3D printing and biomimetic mineralization for personalized enhanced osteogenesis, angiogenesis, and osteointegration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018;10:42146–42154. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b17495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pereira D.d.M., Eischen-Loges M., Birgani Z.T., Habibovic P. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs on biomineralized collagen. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.554565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Meng C., Liu K., Lv Z., Zhang Y., Li J., Luo X., Qiang H., Li K., Liu F., Zhang B., Cui F. Inflammation and immunity gene expression profiling of macrophages on mineralized collagen. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2021;109:1328–1336. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xu S.-J., Qiu Z.-Y., Wu J.-J., Kong X.-D., Weng X.-S., Cui F.-Z., Wang X.-M. Osteogenic differentiation gene expression profiling of hMSCs on hydroxyapatite and mineralized collagen. Tissue Eng. 2016;22:170–181. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2015.0237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xu S.-J., Qiu Z.-Y., Wu J.-J., Kong X.-D., Weng X.-S., Cui F.-Z., Wang X.-M. Osteogenic differentiation gene expression profiling of hMSCs on hydroxyapatite and mineralized collagen. Tissue Eng. 2016;22:170–181. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2015.0237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Inzana J.A., Olvera D., Fuller S.M., Kelly J.P., Graeve O.A., Schwarz E.M., Kates S.L., Awad H.A. 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35:4026–4034. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Qiu Z.-Y., Cui Y., Tao C.-S., Zhang Z.-Q., Tang P.-F., Mao K.-Y., Wang X.-M., Cui F.-Z. Mineralized collagen: rationale, current status, and clinical applications. Materials. 2015;8:4733–4750. doi: 10.3390/ma8084733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lian K., Lu H., Guo X., Cui F., Qiu Z., Xu S. The mineralized collagen for the reconstruction of intra-articular calcaneal fractures with trabecular defects. Biomatter. 2013;3 doi: 10.4161/biom.27250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yu X., Xu L., Cui F.Z., Qu Y., Lian X.J., Wang X.M., Wang Y. Clinical evaluation of mineralized collagen as a bone graft substitute for anterior cervical intersomatic fusion. Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering. 2012;2:170–176. doi: 10.1166/jbt.2012.1041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sacks D., Baxter B., Campbell B.C.V., Carpenter J.S., Cognard C., Dippel D., Eesa M., Fischer U., Hausegger K., Hirsch J.A., Shazam Hussain M., Jansen O., Jayaraman M.V., Khalessi A.A., Kluck B.W., Lavine S., Meyers P.M., Ramee S., Rüfenacht D.A., Schirmer C.M., Vorwerk D. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. Int. J. Stroke. 2018;13:612–632. doi: 10.1177/1747493018778713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chen Z., Liu H., Liu X., Cui F.-Z. Injectable calcium sulfate/mineralized collagen-based bone repair materials with regulable self-setting properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2011;99:554–563. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ren X., Tu V., Bischoff D., Weisgerber D.W., Lewis M.S., Yamaguchi D.T., Miller T.A., Harley B.A.C., Lee J.C. Nanoparticulate mineralized collagen scaffolds induce in vivo bone regeneration independent of progenitor cell loading or exogenous growth factor stimulation. Biomaterials. 2016;89:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lee D., Wufuer M., Kim I., Choi T.H., Kim B.J., Jung H.G., Jeon B., Lee G., Jeon O.H., Chang H., Yoon D.S. Sequential dual-drug delivery of BMP-2 and alendronate from hydroxyapatite-collagen scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:746. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80608-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li Z., Du T., Ruan C., Niu X. Bioinspired mineralized collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6:1491–1511. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Murshed M. Mechanism of bone mineralization. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a031229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Veiga A., Castro F., Rocha F., Oliveira A.L. An update on hydroxyapatite/collagen composites: what is there left to say about these bioinspired materials? J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2022;110:1192–1205. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deshpande A.S., Beniash E. Bio-inspired synthesis of mineralized collagen fibrils. Cryst. Growth Des. 2008;8:3084–3090. doi: 10.1021/cg800252f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zheng B., Mao C., Gu T., Pan H., Shao C., Sun J., Chen C., Tang R., Gu X. Phosphorylated chitosan to promote biomimetic mineralization of type I collagen as a strategy for dentin repair and bone tissue engineering. New J. Chem. 2019;43:2002–2010. doi: 10.1039/C8NJ04889D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huang X.Q., Yang H.Y., Luo T., Huang C., Tay F.R., Niu L.N. Hollow mesoporous zirconia delivery system for biomineralization precursors. Acta Biomater. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.049. S1742706117307468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Qi Y., Ye Z., Fok A., Holmes B.N., Espanol M., Ginebra M.P., Aparicio C. Effects of molecular weight and concentration of poly(acrylic acid) on biomimetic mineralization of collagen. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018;4:2758–2766. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang W., Liao S.S., Cui F.Z. Hierarchical self-assembly of nano-fibrils in mineralized collagen. Chem. Mater. 2003;15:3221–3226. doi: 10.1021/cm030080g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lin X., Li X., Fan H. In situ synthesis of bone-like apatite/collagen nano-composite at low temperature. Mater. Lett. 2004;58:3569–3572. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhai Y., Cui F.Z., Wang Y. Formation of nano-hydroxyapatite on recombinant human-like collagen fibrils. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2005;5:429–432. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2005.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.David Lickorish, John A., Ramshaw M., Jerome A., Werkmeister Veronica. Collagen–hydroxyapatite composite prepared by biomimetic process. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2003 doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.20031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gower L.B., Odom D.J. Deposition of calcium carbonate films by a polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process. J. Cryst. Growth. 2000;210:719–734. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00749-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Meldrum F.C., Cölfen H. Controlling mineral morphologies and structures in biological and synthetic systems. Chem. Rev. 2008;108:4332–4432. doi: 10.1021/cr8002856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Olszta M.J., Douglas E.P., Gower L.B. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of the mineralization of type I collagen via a polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2003;72:583–591. doi: 10.1007/s00223-002-1032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Olszta M.J., Odom D.J., Douglas E.P., Gower L.B. A new paradigm for biomineral formation: mineralization via an amorphous liquid-phase precursor. Connect. Tissue Res. 2003;44(Suppl 1):326–334. doi: 10.1080/03008200390181852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sang S.J., Culver L., Li Y., Douglas E.P., Gower L.B. Biomimetic mineralization of collagen via an enzyme-aided PILP process. J. Cryst. Growth. 2015;312:1249–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jee S.-S., Thula T.T., Gower L.B. Development of bone-like composites via the polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process. Part 1: influence of polymer molecular weight. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:3676–3686. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sang S.J., Dimasi E., Kasinath R.K., Kim Y.Y., Gower L. Oriented hydroxyapatite in Turkey tendon mineralized via the polymer-induced liquid-precursor (PILP) process. CrystEngComm. 2011;13 doi: 10.1039/c0ce00605j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Gajjeraman S., Narayanan K., Hao J., Qin C., George A. Matrix macromolecules in hard tissues control the nucleation and hierarchical assembly of hydroxyapatite. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:1193–1204. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604732200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Liu Y., Kim Y.-K., Dai L., Li N., Khan S.O., Pashley D.H., Tay F.R. Hierarchical and non-hierarchical mineralisation of collagen. Biomaterials. 2011;32:1291–1300. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Thula T.T., Rodriguez D.E., Lee M.H., Pendi L., Podschun J., Gower L.B. In vitro mineralization of dense collagen substrates: a biomimetic approach toward the development of bone-graft materials. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3158–3169. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu Y., Nan L., Qi Y.P., Dai L., Bryan T.E., Mao J., Pashley D.H., Tay F.R. Intrafibrillar collagen mineralization produced by biomimetic hierarchical nanoapatite assembly. Adv. Mater. 2011;23:975. doi: 10.1002/adma.201003882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hu C., Zilm M., Wei M. Fabrication of intrafibrillar and extrafibrillar mineralized collagen/apatite scaffolds with a hierarchical structure. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2016;104:1153–1161. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Niu X., Wang L., Tian F., Wang L., Li P., Feng Q., Fan Y. Shear-mediated crystallization from amorphous calcium phosphate to bone apatite. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016;54:131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Niu X., Fan R., Guo X., Du T., Yang Z., Feng Q., Fan Y. Shear-mediated orientational mineralization of bone apatite on collagen fibrils. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017;5:9141–9147. doi: 10.1039/c7tb02223a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Du T., Niu Y., Liu Y., Yang H., Qiao A., Niu X. Physical and chemical characterization of biomineralized collagen with different microstructures. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022;13 doi: 10.3390/jfb13020057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Liben Xie, Lei Wang, Xinru Jia, Guichao Kuang, Sheng Yang. Effects of glutamic acid shelled PAMAM dendrimers on the crystallization of calcium phosphate in diffusion systems. Polym. Bull. 2010;66:119–132. doi: 10.1007/s00289-010-0350-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li J., Yang J., Li J., Chen L., Liang K., Wu W., Chen X., Li J. Bioinspired intrafibrillar mineralization of human dentine by PAMAM dendrimer. Biomaterials. 2013;34:6738–6747. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Su W., Ma L., Ran Y., Ma X., Yi Z., Chen G., Chen X., Li X. Alginate-assisted mineralization of collagen by collagen reconstitution and calcium phosphate formation. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020;6:3275–3286. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Manuel Delgado-López J., Bertolotti F., Lyngs J., Skov Pedersen J., Cervellino A., Masciocchi N., Guagliardi A. The synergic role of collagen and citrate in stabilizing amorphous calcium phosphate precursors with platy morphology. Acta Biomater. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.041. S1742706116306377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Jin W., Jin Y., Duan P., Wu H., Zhang L., Du Q., Pan H., Tang R., Shao C. Promotion of collagen mineralization and dentin repair by succinates. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2022;10:5826–5834. doi: 10.1039/d2tb01005d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Du T., Niu Y., Jia Z., Liu Y., Qiao A., Yang H., Niu X. Orthophosphate and alkaline phosphatase induced the formation of apatite with different multilayered structures and mineralization balance. Nanoscale. 2022;14:1814–1825. doi: 10.1039/d1nr06016c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Saxena N., Mizels J., Cremer M.A., Guarnizo V., Rodriguez D.E., Gower L.B. Comparison of synthetic vs. Biogenic polymeric process-directing agents for intrafibrillar mineralization of collagen. Polymers. 2022;14 doi: 10.3390/polym14040775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Wei S., Wu H., Luo X.-j. Biomineralization precursor carrier system based on carboxyl-functionalized large pore mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Current Medical Science. 2020;40:155–167. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2159-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bonchev A., Simeonov M., Shestakova P., Vasileva R., Titorenkova R., Apostolov A., Dyulgerova E., Vassileva E. Bioinspired remineralization of artificial caries lesions using PDMAEMA/Carbomer/Calcium phosphates hybrid microgels. Gels. 2022;8 doi: 10.3390/gels8100681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ma C., Du T., Niu X., Fan Y. Biomechanics and mechanobiology of the bone matrix. Bone Res. 2022;10:59. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00223-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nudelman F., Lausch A.J., Sommerdijk N.A.J.M., Sone E.D. In vitro models of collagen biomineralization. J. Struct. Biol. 2013;183:258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Liu Y., Luo D., Kou X.-X., Wang X.-D., Tay F.R., Sha Y.-L., Gan Y.-H., Zhou Y.-H. Hierarchical intrafibrillar nanocarbonated apatite assembly improves the nanomechanics and cytocompatibility of mineralized collagen. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013;23:1404–1411. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201201611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.de Melo Pereira D., Eischen-Loges M., Birgani Z.T., Habibovic P. Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs on biomineralized collagen. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.554565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sun Y., Liu S., Fu Y., Kou X.-X., He D.-Q., Wang G.-N., Fu C.-C., Liu Y., Zhou Y.-H. Mineralized collagen regulates macrophage polarization during bone regeneration. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2016;12:2029–2040. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2016.2296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhang L., Tang P., Xu M., Zhang W., Chai W., Wang Y. Effects of crystalline phase on the biological properties of collagen-hydroxyapatite composites. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2189–2199. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Liu Y., Liu S., Luo D., Xue Z., Yang X., Cu L., Zhou Y., Wang T. Hierarchically staggered nanostructure of mineralized collagen as a bone-grafting scaffold. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:8740–8748. doi: 10.1002/adma.201602628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Liu Y., Luo D., Liu S., Fu Y., Kou X., Wang X., Sha Y., Gan Y., Zhou Y. Effect of nanostructure of mineralized collagen scaffolds on their physical properties and osteogenic potential. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014;10:1049–1060. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kim J.H., Kim T.H., Jin G.Z., Park J.H., Yun Y.R., Jang J.H., Kim H.W. Mineralized poly(lactic acid) scaffolds loading vascular endothelial growth factor and the in vivo performance in rat subcutaneous model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2013;101A:1447–1455. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Huipin, Yuan Ping, Zou Zongjian, Yang Xingdong, Zhang J.D. Bone morphogenetic protein and ceramic-induced osteogenesis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 1998 doi: 10.1023/a:1008998817977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Itoh S., Kikuchi M., Takakuda K., Nagaoka K., Koyama Y., Tanaka J., Shinomiya K. Implantation study of a novel hydroxyapatite/collagen (HAp/col) composite into weight-bearing sites of dogs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002;63:507–515. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Feng B., Chen J., Zhang X. Interaction of calcium and phosphate in apatite coating on titanium with serum albumin. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2499–2507. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00384-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Liu Y., Layrolle P., Bruijn J.D., Blitterswijk C.V., Groot K.D. Biomimetic coprecipitation of calcium phosphate and bovine serum albumin on titanium alloy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2015;57:327–335. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636. 20011205)57:3<327::aid-jbm1175>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Dong X., Wang Q., Wu T., Pan H. Understanding adsorption-desorption dynamics of BMP-2 on hydroxyapatite (001) surface. Biophys. J. 2007;93:750–759. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.103168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Gorbunoff M.J. The interaction of proteins with hydroxyapatite. III. Mechanism. Anal. Biochem. 1984;136:433. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shen J.-W., Wu T., Wang Q., Pan H.-H. Molecular simulation of protein adsorption and desorption on hydroxyapatite surfaces. Biomaterials. 2008;29:513–532. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Eisen D., Hakim M.D. Minocycline-induced pigmentation. Incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf. 1998;18:431–440. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818060-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Berthod A., Nair U.B., Bagwill C., Armstrong D.W. Derivatized vancomycin stationary phases for LC chiral separations. Talanta. 1996;43:1767–1782. doi: 10.1016/0039-9140(96)01974-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Coelho C.C., Sousa S.R., Monteiro F.J. Heparinized nanohydroxyapatite/collagen granules for controlled release of vancomycin. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2015;103:3128–3138. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Nadar R.A., Margiotta N., Iafisco M., van den Beucken J.J.J.P., Boerman O.C., Leeuwenburgh S.C.G. Bisphosphonate-functionalized imaging agents, anti-tumor agents and nanocarriers for treatment of bone cancer. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2017;6 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201601119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Iafisco M., Palazzo B., Falini G., Foggia M.D., Bonora S., Nicolis S., Casella L., Roveri N. Adsorption and conformational change of myoglobin on biomimetic hydroxyapatite nanocrystals functionalized with alendronate. Langmuir. 2008;24:4924–4930. doi: 10.1021/la703381h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Russell R.G.G., Watts N.B., Ebetino F.H., Rogers M.J. Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy. Osteoporos. Int. : a Journal Established as Result of Cooperation Between the European Foundation For Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2008;19:733–759. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0540-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cole L.E., Vargo-Gogola T., Roeder R.K. Targeted delivery to bone and mineral deposits using bisphosphonate ligands. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;99:12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Egawa S., Hirai K., Matsumoto R., Yoshii T., Yuasa M., Okawa A., Sugo K., Sotome S. Efficacy of antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite/collagen composites is dependent on adsorbability for treating Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rats. J. Orthop. Res. 2020;38:843–851. doi: 10.1002/jor.24507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Liu K., Meng C.X., Lv Z.Y., Zhang Y.J., Li J., Li K.Y., Liu F.Z., Zhang B., Cui F.Z. Enhancement of BMP-2 and VEGF carried by mineralized collagen for mandibular bone regeneration. Regen Biomater. 2020;7:435–440. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaa022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chao Y.L., Lin L.D., Chang H.H., Wang T.M. Preliminary evaluation of BMP-2-derived peptide in repairing a peri-implant critical size defect: a canine model. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2021;120:1212–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Murphy C.M., Schindeler A., Gleeson J.P., Yu N.Y., Cantrill L.C., Mikulec K., Peacock L., O'Brien F.J., Little D.G. A collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold allows for binding and co-delivery of recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins and bisphosphonates. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:2250–2258. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Su W., Ma X., Sun Z., Yi Z., Cui X., Chen G., Chen X., Guo B., Li X. RhBMP-2 and concomitant rapid material degradation synergistically promote bone repair and regeneration with collagen-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2018;6:4338–4350. doi: 10.1039/c8tb00405f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhang X., Guo W.-G., Cui H., Liu H.-Y., Zhang Y., Mueller W.E.G., Cui F.-Z. In vitro and in vivo enhancement of osteogenic capacity in a synthetic BMP-2 derived peptide-coated mineralized collagen composite. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2016;10:99–107. doi: 10.1002/term.1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Quade M., Knaack S., Weber D., Koenig U., Paul B., Simon P., Roesen-Wolff A., Schwartz-Albiez R., Gelinsky M., Lode A. Heparin modification of a biomimetic bone matrix modulates osteogenic and angiogenic cell response in vitro. Eur. Cell. Mater. 2017;33:105–120. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v033a08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sasisekharan R., Venkataraman G. Heparin and heparan sulfate: biosynthesis, structure and function. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000;4:626–631. doi: 10.1016/s1367-5931(00)00145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Capila I., Linhardt R.J. Heparin-protein interactions. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2002;41:391–412. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020201)41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.König U., Lode A., Welzel P.B., Ueda Y., Knaack S., Henß A., Hauswald A., Gelinsky M. Heparinization of a biomimetic bone matrix: integration of heparin during matrix synthesis versus adsorptive post surface modification. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014;25:607–621. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Sanjurjo-Rodríguez C., Martínez-Sánchez A.H., Hermida-Gómez T., Fuentes-Boquete I., Díaz-Prado S., Blanco F.J. Differentiation of human mesenchymal stromal cells cultured on collagen sponges for cartilage repair. Histol. Histopathol. 2016;31:1221–1239. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zwingenberger S., Langanke R., Vater C., Lee G., Niederlohmann E., Sensenschmidt M., Jacobi A., Bernhardt R., Muders M., Rammelt S., Knaack S., Gelinsky M., Guenther K.-P., Goodman S.B., Stiehler M. The effect of SDF-1 on low dose BMP-2 mediated bone regeneration by release from heparinized mineralized collagen type I matrix scaffolds in a murine critical size bone defect model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2016;104:2126–2134. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Knaack S., Lode A., Hoyer B., Roesen-Wolff A., Gabrielyan A., Roeder I., Gelinsky M. Heparin modification of a biomimetic bone matrix for controlled release of VEGF. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2014;102:3500–3511. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Chen L., He Z., Chen B., Yang M., Zhao Y., Sun W., Xiao Z., Zhang J., Dai J. Loading of VEGF to the heparin cross-linked demineralized bone matrix improves vascularization of the scaffold. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010;21:309–317. doi: 10.1007/s10856-009-3827-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Bretschneider H., Quade M., Lode A., Gelinsky M., Rammelt S., Vater C. Chemotactic and angiogenic potential of mineralized collagen scaffolds functionalized with naturally occurring bioactive factor mixtures to stimulate bone regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22 doi: 10.3390/ijms22115836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ratanavaraporn J., Furuya H., Kohara H., Tabata Y. Synergistic effects of the dual release of stromal cell-derived factor-1 and bone morphogenetic protein-2 from hydrogels on bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2797–2811. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zhu T., Jiang M., Zhang M., Cui L., Yang X., Wang X., Liu G., Ding J., Chen X. Biofunctionalized composite scaffold to potentiate osteoconduction, angiogenesis, and favorable metabolic microenvironment for osteonecrosis therapy. Bioact. Mater. 2022;9:446–460. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Kempen D.H.R., Lu L., Hefferan T.E., Creemers L.B., Maran A., Classic K.L., Dhert W.J.A., Yaszemski M.J. Retention of in vitro and in vivo BMP-2 bioactivities in sustained delivery vehicles for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3245–3252. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Epstein NancyE. Pros, cons, and costs of INFUSE in spinal surgery. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2011;2:10. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.76147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Quade M., Knaack S., Akkineni A.R., Gabrielyan A., Lode A., Roesen-Wolff A., Gelinsky M. Central growth factor loaded depots in bone tissue engineering scaffolds for enhanced cell attraction. Tissue Eng. 2017;23:762–772. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Quade M., Münch P., Lode A., Duin S., Vater C., Gabrielyan A., Rösen-Wolff A., Gelinsky M. The secretome of hypoxia conditioned hMSC loaded in a central depot induces chemotaxis and angiogenesis in a biomimetic mineralized collagen bone replacement material. Advanced healthcare materials. 2020;9 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201901426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hassani A., Khoshfetrat A.B., Rahbarghazi R., Sakai S. Collagen and nano-hydroxyapatite interactions in alginate-based microcapsule provide an appropriate osteogenic microenvironment for modular bone tissue formation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022;277 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Zhao Shen Yildirimer, Lara Zhao, Hong Ding, Ruihua Wang. Huanan, injectable stem cell-laden photocrosslinkable microspheres fabricated using microfluidics for rapid generation of osteogenic tissue constructs. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016;26:2976. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201504943. 2976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Niu X., Fan Y., Liu X., Li X., Li P., Wang J., Sha Z., Feng Q. Repair of bone defect in femoral condyle using microencapsulated chitosan, nanohydroxyapatite/collagen and poly(L-lactide)-based microsphere-scaffold delivery system. Artif. Organs. 2011;35:E119–E128. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Niu X., Feng Q., Wang M., Guo X., Zheng Q. Porous nano-HA/collagen/PLLA scaffold containing chitosan microspheres for controlled delivery of synthetic peptide derived from BMP-2. J. Contr. Release. 2009;134:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yang F., Xu C., Zhang W., Sun L., Feng G., Ning T., Wang W., Sun B., Li J., Niu X., Fan Y. Biodegradable magnesium incorporated microspheres enable immunomodulation and spatiotemporal drug release for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Compos. B Eng. 2023:250. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Chen L., Lin J., Li J., Wang X., Zhuang J., Wang H., Cheng K., Weng W. Spatially-controlled distribution of HACC in mineralized collagen coatings for improving rhBMP-2 loading and release behavior. Colloids Surf., B. 2016;145:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Quinlan E., Lopez-Noriega A., Thompson E., Kelly H.M., Cryan S.A., O'Brien F.J. Development of collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds incorporating PLGA and alginate microparticles for the controlled delivery of rhBMP-2 for bone tissue engineering. J. Contr. Release. 2015;198:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Quinlan E., Lopez-Noriega A., Thompson E.M., Hibbitts A., Cryan S.A., O'Brien F.J. Controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor from spray-dried alginate microparticles in collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for promoting vascularization and bone repair. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11:1097–1109. doi: 10.1002/term.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Silva E.A., Mooney D.J. Spatiotemporal control of vascular endothelial growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels enhances angiogenesis. J. Thromb. Haemostasis. 2007;5:590–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Elçin Y.M., Dixit V., Gitnick G. Extensive in vivo angiogenesis following controlled release of human vascular endothelial cell growth factor: implications for tissue engineering and wound healing. Artif. Organs. 2001;25:558–565. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025007558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lee J.C., Volpicelli E.J. Bioinspired collagen scaffolds in cranial bone regeneration: from bedside to bench. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2017;6 doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Bose S., Tarafder S. Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:1401–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Chai Y., Lin D., Ma Y., Yuan Y., Liu C. RhBMP-2 loaded MBG/PEGylated poly(glycerol sebacate) composite scaffolds for rapid bone regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017;5:4633–4647. doi: 10.1039/c7tb00505a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Tarafder S., Nansen K., Bose S. Lovastatin release from polycaprolactone coated β-tricalcium phosphate: effects of pH, concentration and drug-polymer interactions. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33:3121–3128. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.02.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Kisiel M., Klar A.S., Ventura M., Buijs J., Mafina M.-K., Cool S.M., Hilborn J. Complexation and sequestration of BMP-2 from an ECM mimetic hyaluronan gel for improved bone formation. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Kisiel M., Ventura M., Oommen O.P., George A., Walboomers X.F., Hilborn J., Varghese O.P. Critical assessment of rhBMP-2 mediated bone induction: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation. J. Contr. Release. 2012;162:646–653. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Quinlan E., Thompson E.M., Matsiko A., O'Brien F.J., Lopez-Noriega A. Long-term controlled delivery of rhBMP-2 from collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for superior bone tissue regeneration. J. Contr. Release. 2015;207:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Wang S., Umrath F., Cen W., Reinert S., Alexander D. Angiogenic potential of VEGF mimetic peptides for the biofunctionalization of collagen/hydroxyapatite composites. Biomolecules. 2021;11 doi: 10.3390/biom11101538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Schuster L., Ardjomandi N., Munz M., Umrath F., Klein C., Rupp F., Reinert S., Alexander D. Establishment of collagen: hydroxyapatite/BMP-2 mimetic peptide composites. Materials. 2020;13 doi: 10.3390/ma13051203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Suchy T., Supova M., Klapkova E., Adamkova V., Zavora J., Zaloudkova M., Ryglova S., Ballay R., Denk F., Pokorny M., Sauerova P., Hubalek Kalbacova M., Horny L., Vesely J., Vonavkova T., Prusa R. The release kinetics, antimicrobial activity and cytocompatibility of differently prepared collagen/hydroxyapatite/vancomycin layers: microstructure vs. nanostructure. Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2017;100:219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Bertinetti L., Drouet C., Combes C., Rey C., Tampieri A., Coluccia S., Martra G. Surface characteristics of nanocrystalline apatites: effect of mg surface enrichment on morphology, surface hydration species, and cationic environments. Langmuir. 2009;25:5647–5654. doi: 10.1021/la804230j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Lin K., Chang J., Liu X., Chen L., Zhou Y. Synthesis of element-substituted hydroxyapatite with controllable morphology and chemical composition using calcium silicate as precursor. CrystEngComm. 2011;13:4850–4855. doi: 10.1039/c0ce00835d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Saghiri M.A., Asatourian A., Orangi J., Sorenson C.M., Sheibani N. Functional role of inorganic trace elements in angiogenesis-Part II: Cr, Si, Zn, Cu, and S. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2015;96:143–155. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Saghiri M.A., Asatourian A., Orangi J., Sorenson C.M., Sheibani N. Functional role of inorganic trace elements in angiogenesis--Part I: N, Fe, Se, P, Au, and Ca. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2015;96:129–142. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Yu L., Rowe D.W., Perera I.P., Zhang J., Suib S.L., Xin X., Wei M. Intrafibrillar mineralized collagen-hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for bone regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:18235–18249. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c00275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Quade M., Schumacher M., Bernhardt A., Lode A., Kampschulte M., Voss A., Simon P., Uckermann O., Kirsch M., Gelinsky M. Strontium-modification of porous scaffolds from mineralized collagen for potential use in bone defect therapy. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications. 2018;84:159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Quade M., Vater C., Schlootz S., Bolte J., Langanke R., Bretschneider H., Gelinsky M., Goodman S.B., Zwingenberger S. Strontium enhances BMP-2 mediated bone regeneration in a femoral murine bone defect model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B. 2020;108:174–182. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Tiffany A.S., Gray D.L., Woods T.J., Subedi K., Harley B.A.C. The inclusion of zinc into mineralized collagen scaffolds for craniofacial bone repair applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;93:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Eanes E.D., Rattner S.L. The effect of magnesium on apatite formation in seeded supersaturated solutions at pH 7.4. J. Dent. Res. 1981;60:1719–1723. doi: 10.1177/00220345810600091401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Antoniac I.V., Antoniac A., Vasile E., Tecu C., Fosca M., Yankova V.G., Rau J.V. In vitro characterization of novel nanostructured collagen-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds doped with magnesium with improved biodegradation rate for hard tissue regeneration. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6:3383–3395. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Minardi S., Corradetti B., Taraballi F., Sandri M., Van Eps J., Cabrera F.J., Weiner B.K., Tampieri A., Tasciotti E. Evaluation of the osteoinductive potential of a bio-inspired scaffold mimicking the osteogenic niche for bone augmentation. Biomaterials. 2015;62:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Zhou Q., Ren X., Oberoi M.K., Bedar M., Caprini R.M., Dewey M.J., Kolliopoulos V., Yamaguchi D.T., Harley B.A.C., Lee J.C. Beta-catenin limits osteogenesis on regenerative materials in a stiffness-dependent manner. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2021 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202101467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Chao Y.L., Wang T.M., Chang H.H., Lin L.D. Effects of low-dose rhBMP-2 on peri-implant ridge augmentation in a canine model. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2021;48:734–744. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ho-Shui-Ling A., Bolander J., Rustom L.E., Johnson A.W., Luyten F.P., Picart C. Bone regeneration strategies: engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials. 2018;180:143–162. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Tang Z.-B., Cao J.-K., Wen N., Wang H.-B., Zhang Z.-W., Liu Z.-Q., Zhou J., Duan C.-M., Cui F.-Z., Wang C.-Y. Posterolateral spinal fusion with nano-hydroxyapatite-collagen/PLA composite and autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in a rabbit model. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2012;6:325–336. doi: 10.1002/term.445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Walsh D.P., Raftery R.M., Chen G., Heise A., O'Brien F.J., Cryan S.A. Rapid healing of a critical-sized bone defect using a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold to facilitate low dose, combinatorial growth factor delivery. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13:1843–1853. doi: 10.1002/term.2934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Lowery J.W., Rosen V. Bone morphogenetic protein-based therapeutic approaches. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2018;10 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Drake C.J., Little C.D. Exogenous vascular endothelial growth factor induces malformed and hyperfused vessels during embryonic neovascularization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995;92:7657–7661. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.James A.W., LaChaud G., Shen J., Asatrian G., Nguyen V., Zhang X., Ting K., Soo C. A review of the clinical side effects of bone morphogenetic protein-2. Tissue Eng. B Rev. 2016;22:284–297. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2015.0357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Carragee E.J., Hurwitz E.L., Weiner B.K. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011;11:471–491. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Tannoury C.A., An H.S. Complications with the use of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) in spine surgery. Spine J. 2014;14:552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Park S.Y., Kim K.H., Shin S.Y., Koo K.T., Lee Y.M., Seol Y.J. Dual delivery of rhPDGF-BB and bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells expressing the BMP2 gene enhance bone formation in a critical-sized defect model. Tissue Eng. 2013;19:2495–2505. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Lee J.H., Jang S.J., Baek H.R., Lee K.M., Chang B.S., Lee C.K. Synergistic induction of early stage of bone formation by combination of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and epidermal growth factor. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2015 doi: 10.1002/term.1900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Wu B., Zheng Q., Guo X., Wu Y., Wang Y., Cui F. Preparation and ectopic osteogenesis in vivo of scaffold based on mineralized recombinant human-like collagen loaded with synthetic BMP-2-derived peptide. Biomed. Mater. 2008;3 doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/4/044111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Bhandari M., Bajammal S., Guyatt G.H., Griffith L., Busse J.W., Schünemann H., Einhorn T.A. Effect of bisphosphonates on periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:293–301. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.D.01772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Inoue Y., Hisa I., Seino S., Kaji H. Alendronate induces mineralization in mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells: regulation of mineralization-related genes. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes. 2010;118:719–723. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Boanini E., Torricelli P., Gazzano M., Giardino R., Bigi A. Alendronate–hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and their interaction with osteoclasts and osteoblast-like cells. Biomaterials. 2008;29:790–796. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Ma X., He Z., Han F., Zhong Z., Chen L., Li B. Preparation of collagen/hydroxyapatite/alendronate hybrid hydrogels as potential scaffolds for bone regeneration. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2016;143:81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.03.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Quinlan E., Thompson E.M., Matsiko A., O'Brien F.J., Lopez-Noriega A. Functionalization of a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold with osteostatin to facilitate enhanced bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4:2649–2656. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201500439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Wu H., Song Y., Li J., Lei X., Zhang S., Gao Y., Cheng P., Liu B., Miao S., Bi L., Yang L., Pei G. Blockade of adrenergic beta-receptor activation through local delivery of propranolol from a 3D collagen/polyvinyl alcohol/hydroxyapatite scaffold promotes bone repair in vivo. Cell Prolif. 2020;53 doi: 10.1111/cpr.12725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Ren X., Dejam D., Oberoi M.K., Dahan N.J., Zhou Q., Huang K.X., Bedar M., Chan C.H., Kolliopoulos V., Dewey M.J., Harley B.A.C., Lee J.C. Osteoprotegerin-eluting nanoparticulate mineralized collagen scaffolds improve skull regeneration. Biomater Adv. 2023;145 doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2022.213262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Bonnelye E., Chabadel A., Saltel F., Jurdic P. Dual effect of strontium ranelate: stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and inhibition of osteoclast formation and resorption in vitro. Bone. 2008;42:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.08.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Peng S., Liu X.S., Huang S., Li Z., Pan H., Zhen W., Luk K.D.K., Guo X.E., Lu W.W. The cross-talk between osteoclasts and osteoblasts in response to strontium treatment: involvement of osteoprotegerin. Bone. 2011;49:1290–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Hurtel-Lemaire A.S., Mentaverri R., Caudrillier A., Cournarie F., Wattel A., Kamel S., Terwilliger E.F., Brown E.M., Brazier M. The calcium-sensing receptor is involved in strontium ranelate-induced osteoclast apoptosis. New insights into the associated signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:575–584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801668200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Bakker A.D., Zandieh-Doulabi B., Klein-Nulend J. Strontium ranelate affects signaling from mechanically-stimulated osteocytes towards osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Bone. 2013;53:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.11.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Ye Z., Qi Y., Zhang A., Karels B.J., Aparicio C. Biomimetic mineralization of fibrillar collagen with strontium-doped hydroxyapatite. ACS Macro Lett. 2023;12:408–414. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.de Bruijn J.D., Klein C.P., de Groot K., van Blitterswijk C.A. The ultrastructure of the bone-hydroxyapatite interface in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1992;26:1365–1382. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820261008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Landi E., Logroscino G., Proietti L., Tampieri A., Sandri M., Sprio S. Biomimetic Mg-substituted hydroxyapatite: from synthesis to in vivo behaviour. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2008;19:239–247. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-0032-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Hang Z., Bing L., Hj A., Zd A., Kyc D. Magnesium-based biomaterials as emerging agents for bone repair and regeneration: from mechanism to application. J. Magnesium Alloys. 2021;9:779–804. doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2021.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Lin K., Zhou Y., Zhou Y., Qu H., Chen F., Zhu Y., Chang J. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite porous microspheres with co-substituted essential trace elements: surfactant-free hydrothermal synthesis, enhanced degradation and drug release. 生物材料. 2011;21:16558–16565. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12514a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.A M Maier Jeanette, Daniela Bernardini, Yves Rayssiguier. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta Molecular Basis of Disease; 2004. High Concentrations of Magnesium Modulate Vascular Endothelial Cell Behaviour in Vitro. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Krishnakumar G.S., Gostynska N., Campodoni E., Dapporto M., Montesi M., Panseri S., Tampieri A., Kon E., Marcacci M., Sprio S., Sandri M. Ribose mediated crosslinking of collagen-hydroxyapatite hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration using biomimetic strategies. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;77:594–605. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Sartori M., Pagani S., Ferrari A., Costa V., Carina V., Figallo E., Maltarello M.C., Martini L., Fini M., Giavaresi G. A new bi-layered scaffold for osteochondral tissue regeneration: in vitro and in vivo preclinical investigations. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70:101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Popa C.L., Bartha C.M., Albu M., Guégan R., Antohe S. Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation on zinc doped hydroxyapatite in collagen matrix. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2015;10:681–691. [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Yu W., Sun T.W., Qi C., Ding Z., Zhao H., Zhao S., Shi Z., Zhu Y.J., Chen D., He Y. Evaluation of zinc-doped mesoporous hydroxyapatite microspheres for the construction of a novel biomimetic scaffold optimized for bone augmentation. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017;12:2293–2306. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S126505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Paluszkiewicz C., Lósarczyk A., Pijocha D., Sitarz M., Bućko M., Zima A., Chróścicka A., Lewandowska-Szumie M. Synthesis, structural properties and thermal stability of Mn-doped hydroxyapatite. J. Mol. Struct. 2010;976:301–309. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Relea P., Revilla M., Ripoll E., Arribas I. Age & Ageing; 1995. Zinc, Biochemical Markers of Nutrition, and Type I Osteoporosis. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Hojyo S., Fukada T., Shimoda S., Ohashi W., Bin B.H., Koseki H., Hirano T. The zinc transporter slc39a14/ZIP14 controls G-protein coupled receptor-mediated signaling required for systemic growth. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Tian Y., Cao H., Qiao Y., Liu X. Antimicrobial and osteogenic properties of iron-doped titanium. RSC Adv. 2016;6:46495–46507. doi: 10.1039/C6RA08359E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Neyens E., Baeyens J. A review of classic Fenton's peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique. J. Hazard Mater. 2003;98:33–50. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00282-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Lin S., Li J., Dong L., Cheng K., Lin J., Weng W. Periodic-mechanical-stimulus enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on Fe3O4/mineralized collagen coatings. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019;5:6446–6453. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Jing Z., Wu Y., Su W., Tian M., Jiang W., Cao L., Zhao L., Zhao Z. Carbon nanotube reinforced collagen/hydroxyapatite scaffolds improve bone tissue formation in vitro and in vivo. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2017;45:2075–2087. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1866-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Mac C.H., Chan H.Y., Lin Y.H., Sharma A.K., Song H.L., Chan Y.S., Lin K.J., Lin Y.J., Sung H.W. Engineering a biomimetic bone scaffold that can regulate redox homeostasis and promote osteogenesis to repair large bone defects. Biomaterials. 2022;286 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Ye Z., Zhu X., Mutreja I., Boda S.K., Fischer N.G., Zhang A., Lui C., Qi Y., Aparicio C. Biomimetic mineralized hybrid scaffolds with antimicrobial peptides. Bioact. Mater. 2021;6:2250–2260. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Dewey M.J., Kolliopoulos V., Ngo M.T., Harley B.A.C. Glycosaminoglycan content of a mineralized collagen scaffold promotes mesenchymal stem cell secretion of factors to modulate angiogenesis and monocyte differentiation. Materialia. 2021;18 doi: 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Song Y., Wu H., Gao Y., Li J., Pei G. Zinc silicate/nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds promote angiogenesis and bone regeneration via the p38 MAPK pathway in activated monocytes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12 doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c00470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Niikura T., Hak D.J., Reddi A.H. Global gene profiling reveals a downregulation of BMP gene expression in experimental atrophic nonunions compared to standard healing fractures. J. Orthop. Res. 2010;24:1463–1471. doi: 10.1002/jor.20182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Peattie R.A., Nayate A.P., Firpo M.A., Shelby J., Fisher R.J., Prestwich G.D. Stimulation of in vivo angiogenesis by cytokine-loaded hyaluronic acid hydrogel implants. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2789–2798. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.D'Andrea L.D., Iaccarino G., Fattorusso R., Sorriento D., Carannante C., Capasso D., Trimarco B., Pedone C. Targeting angiogenesis: structural characterization and biological properties of a de novo engineered VEGF mimicking peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:14215–14220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505047102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Peng H., Wright V., Usas A., Gearhart B., Shen H.-C., Cummins J., Huard J. Synergistic enhancement of bone formation and healing by stem cell-expressed VEGF and bone morphogenetic protein-4. J. Clin. Invest. 2002;110:751–759. doi: 10.1172/JCI15153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Dou D.D., Zhou G., Liu H.W., Zhang J., Liu M.L., Xiao X.F., Fei J.J., Guan X.L., Fan Y.B. Sequential releasing of VEGF and BMP-2 in hydroxyapatite collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: design and characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;123:622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Gabrielyan A., Neumann E., Gelinsky M., Rösen-Wolff A. Metabolically conditioned media derived from bone marrow stromal cells or human skin fibroblasts act as effective chemoattractants for mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2017;8:212. doi: 10.1186/s13287-017-0664-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Li M., Jia W., Zhang X., Weng H., Gu G., Chen Z. Hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides modified mineralized collagen and chitosan with enhanced osteoinductive properties for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021:260. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Koenig U., Lode A., Welzel P.B., Ueda Y., Knaack S., Henss A., Hauswald A., Gelinsky M. Heparinization of a biomimetic bone matrix: integration of heparin during matrix synthesis versus adsorptive post surface modification. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2014;25:607–621. doi: 10.1007/s10856-013-5098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Li M., Zhang X., Jia W., Wang Q., Liu Y., Wang X., Wang C., Jian J., Gu G., Guo Z., Chen Z. Improving in vitro biocompatibility on biomimetic mineralized collagen bone materials modified with hyaluronic acid oligosaccharide. Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications. 2019:104. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Weisgerber D.W., Caliari S.R., Harley B.A.C. Mineralized collagen scaffolds induce hMSC osteogenesis and matrix remodeling. Biomater. Sci. 2015;3:533–542. doi: 10.1039/c4bm00397g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Mariani E., Lisignoli G., Borzì R., Pulsatelli L. Biomaterials: foreign bodies or tuners for the immune response? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20 doi: 10.3390/ijms20030636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Vishwakarma A., Bhise N.S., Evangelista M.B., Rouwkema J., Dokmeci M.R., Ghaemmaghami A.M., Vrana N.E., Khademhosseini A. Engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials to tune the inflammatory response. Trends Biotechnol. 2016:470–482. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Zhou G., Groth T. Macromolecular Bioscience; 2018. Host Responses to Biomaterials and Anti-Inflammatory Design—A Brief Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Janeway C.A., Medzhitov R. Innate immune recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2002;20:197–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.083001.084359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Dong L., Wang C. Harnessing the power of macrophages/monocytes for enhanced bone tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:342–346. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Liu Z., Zhang J., Fu C., Ding J. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomaterials promote bone regeneration. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2023;18 doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2023.100774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Zhang J., Tong D., Song H., Ruan R., Sun Y., Lin Y., Wang J., Hou L., Dai J., Ding J., Yang H. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomimetically hierarchical scaffold for augmented bone regeneration. Adv. Mater. 2022;34 doi: 10.1002/adma.202202044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Xuan Y., Li L., Ma M., Cao J., Zhang Z. Hierarchical intrafibrillarly mineralized collagen membrane promotes guided bone regeneration and regulates M2 macrophage polarization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.781268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Shao J., Weng L., Li J., Lin H., Wang H., Lin J. Regulation of macrophage polarization by mineralized collagen coating to accelerate the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2022;8:610–619. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Li J., Zhang Y.-J., Lv Z.-Y., Liu K., Meng C.-X., Zou B., Li K.-Y., Liu F.-Z., Zhang B. The observed difference of macrophage phenotype on different surface roughness of mineralized collagen. Regenerative biomaterials. 2020;7:203–211. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbz053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Bacakova L., Novotna K., Hadraba D., Musilkova J., Slepicka P., Beran M. Influence of biomimetically mineralized collagen scaffolds on bone cell proliferation and immune activation. Polymers. 2022;14 doi: 10.3390/polym14030602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Nair M.B., Kretlow J.D., Mikos A.G., Kasper F.K. Infection and tissue engineering in segmental bone defects--a mini review. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011;22:721–725. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Yu M., You D., Zhuang J., Lin S., Dong L., Weng S., Zhang B., Cheng K., Weng W., Wang H. Controlled release of naringin in metal-organic framework-loaded mineralized collagen coating to simultaneously enhance osseointegration and antibacterial activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:19698–19705. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b05296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Mulazzi M., Campodoni E., Bassi G., Montesi M., Panseri S., Bonvicini F., Gentilomi G.A., Tampieri A., Sandri M. Medicated hydroxyapatite/collagen hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration and local antimicrobial therapy to prevent bone infections. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13 doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13071090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Martin V., Ribeiro I.A., Alves M.M., Goncalves L., Claudio R.A., Grenho L., Fernandes M.H., Gomes P., Santos C.F., Bettencourt A.F. Engineering a multifunctional 3D-printed PLA-collagen-minocycline-nanoHydroxyapatite scaffold with combined antimicrobial and osteogenic effects for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;101:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Suchý T., Šupová M., Klapková E., Horný L., Rýglová Š., Žaloudková M., Braun M., Sucharda Z., Ballay R., Veselý J., Chlup H., Denk F. The sustainable release of vancomycin and its degradation products from nanostructured collagen/hydroxyapatite composite layers. J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2016;105:1288–1294. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3549(15)00175-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Suchy T., Supova M., Sauerova P., Hubalek Kalbacova M., Klapkova E., Pokorny M., Horny L., Zavora J., Ballay R., Denk F., Sojka M., Vistejnova L. Evaluation of collagen/hydroxyapatite electrospun layers loaded with vancomycin, gentamicin and their combination: comparison of release kinetics, antimicrobial activity and cytocompatibility. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2019;140:50–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Oshima S., Sato T., Honda M., Suetsugu Y., Ozeki K., Kikuchi M. Fabrication of gentamicin-loaded hydroxyapatite/collagen bone-like nanocomposite for anti-infection bone void fillers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21 doi: 10.3390/ijms21020551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.You C., Li Q., Wang X., Wu P., Han C. Silver nanoparticle loaded collagen/chitosan scaffolds promote wound healing via regulating fibroblast migration and macrophage activation. Sci. Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10481-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Ahmad M.B., Lim J.J., Shameli K., Ibrahim N.A., Tay M.Y. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles in chitosan, gelatin and chitosan/gelatin bionanocomposites by a chemical reducing agent and their characterization. Molecules. 2011;16:7237–7248. doi: 10.3390/molecules16097237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Vinicius Cardoso, Patrick Quelemes, Adriany Amorin, Fernando Lucas. Collagen-based silver nanoparticles for biological applications: synthesis and characterization. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2014 doi: 10.1186/PREACCEPT-1204601670134438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Socrates R., Sakthivel N., Rajaram A., Ramamoorthy U., Kalkura S.N. Novel fibrillar collagen–hydroxyapatite matrices loaded with silver nanoparticles for orthopedic application. Mater. Lett. 2015;161:759–762. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.09.089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Predoi D., Iconaru S.L., Albu M., Petre C.C., Jiga G. Physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of silver-doped hydroxyapatite collagen biocomposite. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2017;57:537–545. doi: 10.1002/pen.24553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Wang J., Wang Y., Liu D., Yang Q., Huang C., Yang C., Zhang Q. Preparation and cytological study of collagen/nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide composites. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 2018;20:65–74. doi: 10.5277/abb-01188-2018-04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.


Articles from Materials Today Bio are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES