Skip to main content
. 2023 May 20;23:465. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10955-7

Table 4.

Tumor response of different treatment modalities (n=26)

Treatment modalities Patients (n, %) ORR (%)a ORR (%)b
TKI+PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody 1 (3.8) 1 (100) 1 (100)
 Sorafenib + Sintilimab 1 1 (100) 1 (100)
Locoregional therapies + TKI 4 (15.4) 1 (25) 3 (75)
 TACE + Lenvatinib 3 0 (0) 1 (33.3)
 TACE + Radiotherapy+ Lenvatinib 1 0 (0) 1 (100)
Locoregional therapies +TKI + Anti-PD-1 21 (80.8) 10 (47.6) 17 (81)
 HAIC + Lenvatinib + Camrelizumab 12 5 (41.7) 8 (66.7)
 HAIC + Apatinib + Camrelizumab 3 2 (66.7) 3 (100)
 TACE + Sorafenib +Sintilimab 1 0 (0) 1 (100)
 TACE + Sorafenib + Camrelizumab 2 2 (100) 2 (100)
 TACE + Lenvatinib + Camrelizumab 1 0 (0) 1 (100)
 TACE + Apatinib + Camrelizumab 2 1 (50) 2 (100)

aRECIST v1.1

bmRECIST