Table 13.
Correlation tests between scenario A and scenario B during 2016–2020
| Pearson correlation | Spearman correlation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scenario A | Scenario B | Scenario A | Scenario B | ||
| 2016 | Scenario A | – | 0.954*** | – | 0.949*** |
| Scenario B | 0.954*** | – | 0.949*** | – | |
| 2017 | Scenario A | – | 0.956*** | – | 0.946*** |
| Scenario B | 0.956*** | – | 0.946*** | – | |
| 2018 | Scenario A | – | 0.916*** | – | 0.910*** |
| Scenario B | 0.916*** | – | 0.910*** | – | |
| 2019 | Scenario A | – | 0.929*** | – | 0.927*** |
| Scenario B | 0.929*** | – | 0.927*** | – | |
| 2020 | Scenario A | – | 0.951*** | – | 0.947*** |
| Scenario B | 0.951*** | – | 0.947*** | – | |
***Represents correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)