Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2023 Feb 1;192:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.01.001

Table 3.

Multivariate models evaluating inter-group differences from baseline to follow-up for selected endpoints

Model 1 Model 2
β
Estimate*
SE P-value β Estimate* SE P-value
Diet quality (RYP score) 3.876 0.961 < 0.001 3.251 1.007 < 0.001
Quality of life (COOP score) −0.548 0.658 0.406 −.649 0.693 0.350
BMI (kg/m2) −0.607 0.15 <0.001 −.451 0.155 0.004
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) −5.33 3.034 0.080 −6.00 3.288 0.069
*

β estimates compare changes in ICR to changes in CR (e.g., a β estimate of 3.9 indicates that the ICR group improved their RYP score by 3.9 points more than the CR group).

Model 1 is adjusted for age and sex.

Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, race, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and heart failure.

BMI = body mass index; COOP = Dartmouth COOP functional health assessment; RYP = Rate Your Plate; SE = standard error