Table 2.

Behavioural analyses

	PNT	NonCanon	Repetition	PPT	Agramm.
Analyses with no covariates
Word Comp.	n = 162	n = 130	n = 218	n = 181	n = 92
	ρ = 0.565	ρ = 0.415	ρ = 0.738	ρ = 0.622	ρ = 0.377
	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001
PNT		n = 102	n = 162	n = 155	n = 73
		ρ = 0.451	ρ = 0.802	ρ = 0.408	ρ = 0.350
		P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001
NonCanon			n = 130	n = 108	n = 79
			ρ = 0.441	ρ = 0.236	ρ = 0.101
			P < 0.001	P = 0.007	P = 0.197
Repetition				n = 181	n = 92
				ρ = 0.502	ρ = 0.205
				P < 0.001	P = 0.039
PPT					n = 75
					ρ = 0.112
					P = 0.164
Analyses with lesion volume covariate
Word Comp.	n = 162	n = 130	n = 218	n = 181	n = 92
	ρ = 0.433	ρ = 0.281	ρ = 0.549	ρ = 0.523	ρ = 0.038
	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P = 0.359
PNT		n = 102	n = 162	n = 155	n = 73
		ρ = 0.364	ρ = 0.756	ρ = 0.306	ρ =−0.051
		P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P < 0.001	P = 0.683
NonCanon			n = 130	n = 108	n = 79
			ρ = 0.317	ρ = 0.146	ρ =−0.137
			P < 0.001	P = 0.067	P = 0.875
Repetition				n = 181	n = 92
				ρ = 0.359	ρ = 0.121
				P < 0.001	P = 0.152
PPT					n = 75
					ρ =−0.076
					P = 0.747

Correlation analyses that survived the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons within each family of tests (with/without lesion volume covariate) (adjusted alpha of P < 0.003) indicated in bold. ρ = Spearman’s rho. Agramm. = Expressive Agrammatism; Comp. = Comprehension; NonCanon = Non-canonical Sentence Comprehension; PNT = Philadelphia Naming Task.