Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 6;23(16):3028–3044. doi: 10.1017/S136898002000227X

Table 3.

Number of animal daily energy content calculated from foresight diets for both health and sustainable food systems

Foresight scenarios at horizon 2050 Animal energy content (%) per day Environmental outcomes References
International/European scenarios
  Millennium Institute: scenario 4 Approximately 16·0 Food loss and waste, crop production for animal feed (86)
  Agrimonde-Terra (INRA-Cirad): ‘healthy’ scenario Approximately 16·7 Climate change (GHGE), land use, urbanisation, cropping and livestock systems (78)
  EAT-Lancet Approximately 13·6 Land system change, biodiversity loss, freshwater use, climate change (GHGE), N and P cycling, food waste (79)
  IDDRI: TYFA scenario Approximately 13·5 Land use, natural prairies and biodiversity, symbiotic N, extensification of livestock and plant production, abandonment of pesticides, climate change (85)
Regional scenarios
  WWF2050: French scenario Approximately 25·7 Land and water use, climate change (GHGE), nitrogen balance, use of fertilisers and phytosanitary products (80,81)
  Afterres 2050: French scenario Approximately 24·3 Climate change (GHGE), land use, pesticide use, plant proteins, non-food valuations, intensive livestock (84)
  Nordic Council of Ministers: Nordic sufficiency scenario Approximately 17·9 Local resources, organic farming system, climate changes (GHGE), biodiversity, grazing, food waste, eutrophication, N balance, pesticides (82)
  Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL: Swiss FeedNoFood2050 scenario Approximately 14·7 Environmental, economic and social performance (83)

GHGE, greenhouse gas emission; TYFA, Ten Years for Agroecology; FiBL, Swiss Research Institute of Organic Agriculture.