Skip to main content
. 2020 May 26;23(18):3435–3447. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000245

Table 1.

Characteristics and backgrounds of participants (n 1228)*

Variables n %
Age (years)
 18–24 306 25
 25–39 658 54
 40–59 238 19
 ≥60 26 2
Gender
 Male 489 40
 Female 739 60
Marital status
 Single 479 39
 Married 708 58
 Divorced 35 3
 Widower 6 0
Education level
 High school or less 145 12
 University 867 71
 Higher degrees 216 18
Work status
 Student 288 23
 Employed 634 52
 Unemployed 250 20
 Retired 56 5
Income (SR)
 <2000 287 23
 2000–4000 164 13
 5000–7000 154 13
 8000–10 000 196 16
 11 000–15 000 191 16
 >15 000 236 19
Field of study
 Medical 338 28
 Scientific 386 31
 Literature 247 20
 No specific field 257 21
Region
 Western region 884 72
 Eastern region 77 6
 North region 12 1
 South region 39 3
 Central region 212 17
BMI category
 Underweight 52 4
 Normal weight 429 35
 Overweight 414 34
 Obese 332 27
Medical diagnosis
 No diseases 830 68
 CVD§ 229 19
 Osteoporosis 40 3
 Diabetes 52 4
 Anaemia 92 7
Perceived diet quality
 Poor 297 24
 Fair 443 36
 Good 299 24
 Very good 157 13
 Excellent 32 3
Weight perception
 Underweight 110 9
 Overweight 790 64
 Normal weight 328 27
Received information about energy
 Yes 894 73
 No 334 27
Restaurant visit
 1 time/week 699 57
 2–6 times/week 460 37
 1 time/d 44 4
 2–3 times/d 25 2
Views about the usefulness of menu-labelling
 Favour 1108 90
 Oppose 18 1·5
 Neutral 84 7
 Don’t know 18 1·5

SR, Saudi Riyal.

*

Data presented as numbers and percentages.

Employee/student.

Self-reported weight and height used to calculate BMI. BMI categories were defined as follows: healthy weight (BMI, 18·5–24·9 kg/m2), overweight (25·0–29·9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2).

§

Includes hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia.