Table 3.
First author, year, reference | Population, design, time of collection, country | Age (years) | n | Diet collection method | Score | Exposure variables (number of categories) | Main associations | Adjustments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beghin (2014)(48) | HELENA study, cross-sectional, 2006–2007, eight European countries | 12·5–17·5 | 1768 | 24hR (× 2) | DQI-AM |
|
|
Sex, age and energy intake |
|
|
|||||||
Finger (2015)(49) | KiGGs study, cross-sectional, 2003–2006, Germany | 11–17 | 6359 | FFQ | HuSKY |
|
|
Age, region, leisure time, media use, total energy expenditure, BMI-for-age, perceived weight status and all SES variables |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Grosso (2013)(50) | Secondary schools of Sicily, cross-sectional, 2010–2011, Italy | 13–16 | 1135 | FFQ | KIDMED index |
|
|
Sex, BMI, physical activity and all SES variables |
Kastorini (2016)(46) | DIATROFI, schools in areas of low SES, intervention study at baseline and after intervention, 2012–2013, Greece | 3–18 | 3941 | FFQ | KIDMED index |
|
|
Age, sex, food insecurity, time of collection (before v. after) and all SES variables |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Ozen (2015)(51) | Balearic Islands, cross-sectional, 2007–2008, Spain | 12–17 | 1691 | 24hR (× 2), FFQ | Mediterranean diet score |
|
|
Age, sex, BMI, physical activity, chronic diseases and all SES variables |
|
|
|||||||
Yannakoulia (2016)(47) | DIATROFI, schools in areas of low SES, cross-sectional, 2012–2013, Greece | 3–18 | 11 717 | FFQ | KIDMED index |
|
|
Age, sex, sedentary and sports activities and all SES variables |
|
|
HELENA, Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence; KiGGs, German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents; 24hR, 24 h recall; DQI-AM, Diet Quality Index for Adolescents; HuSKY, Healthy Nutrition Score for Children and Youth; KIDMED, Mediterranean Diet Quality Index for Children and Adolescents; educ., education; occup., occupation; SES, socio-economic status; FAS, Family Affluence Scale; asso., associated.
Details on risk of bias assessment are not presented since only studies of good quality are tabulated.