Table 4.
Adjusted OR and 95 % CI for unhealthy eating markers prevalence in high and medium categories of economic residential segregation; MOVE-se Academias study, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2014–2015
| Consumption of meat or chicken with excess fat | Regular consumption of soft drinks or artificial juice | Regular consumption of sweet foods | Replacement of lunch or dinner with snacks | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI | P value | OR | 95 % CI | P value | OR | 95 % CI | P value | OR | 95 % CI | P value | |
| Unadjusted | ||||||||||||
| High | 1·66 | 1·10, 2·50 | 0·015 | 1·27 | 0·84, 1·92 | 0·242 | 1·01 | 0·66, 1·55 | 0·941 | 0·60 | 0·19, 1·83 | 0·370 |
| Medium | 1·60 | 1·11, 2·30 | 0·011 | 0·98 | 0·68, 1·43 | 0·955 | 0·79 | 0·53, 116 | 0·228 | 0·93 | 0·37, 2·30 | 0·884 |
| Low | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – |
| Model 1 | ||||||||||||
| High | 1·48 | 1·00, 2·19 | 0·051 | 1·05 | 0·69, 1·59 | 0·815 | 0·90 | 0·57, 1·41 | 0·643 | 0·50 | 0·14, 1·72 | 0·274 |
| Medium | 1·55 | 1·09, 2·20 | 0·014 | 0·91 | 0·62, 1·31 | 0·605 | 0·75 | 0·49, 1·12 | 0·161 | 0·98 | 0·37, 2·61 | 0·891 |
| Low | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | ||
| Model 2 | ||||||||||||
| High | 1·36 | 0·91, 2·03 | 0·129 | 0·96 | 0·63, 1·46 | 0·839 | 1·00 | 0·62, 1·63 | 0·969 | 0·63 | 0·18, 2·17 | 0·468 |
| Medium | 1·47 | 1·03, 2·09 | 0·033 | 0·83 | 0·57, 1·20 | 0·324 | 0·83 | 0·54, 1·28 | 0·405 | 1·11 | 0·42, 2·94 | 0·828 |
| Low | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – |
| Model 3 | ||||||||||||
| High | 1·35 | 0·91, 2·01 | 0·129 | 0·95 | 0·62, 1·45 | 0·832 | 1·01 | 0·62, 1·64 | 0·960 | 0·62 | 0·18, 2·13 | 0·449 |
| Medium | 1·47 | 1·03, 2·09 | 0·031 | 0·82 | 0·56, 1·19 | 0·300 | 0·82 | 0·53, 1·28 | 0·319 | 1·16 | 0·43, 3·08 | 0·764 |
| Low | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – |
| Model 4 | ||||||||||||
| High | 1·35 | 0·92, 2·00 | 0·121 | 0·95 | 0·62, 1·45 | 0·814 | 0·98 | 0·60, 1·60 | 0·954 | 0·62 | 0·18, 2·12 | 0·443 |
| Medium | 1·46 | 1·04, 2·06 | 0·031 | 0·82 | 0·56, 1·19 | 0·297 | 0·82 | 0·54, 1·27 | 0·382 | 1·15 | 0·45, 3·07 | 0·769 |
| Low | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – | 1·00 | Ref. | – |
Ref., reference category.
Logistic regression models using the generalized estimating equations method were used to estimate adjusted OR and 95 % CI. Residential segregation was included in models as a categorical variable with ‘low’ residential segregation as the reference category (high, 
; medium, 
; and low, 
). Regular consumption defined as a consumption of any amount for five days or more per week, except for replacement of lunch or dinner with snacks (seven days per week). Low perceived food environments were considered when the answers to all questions about fruit and vegetable availability (variety, quality and price) were ‘no’.
Model 1: adjusted for age, gender and skin colour.
Model 2: Model 1 + family income and education.
Model 3: Model 2 + self-rated health and BMI (kg/m2).
Model 4: Model 3 + low perceived food environment.
Bold denotes statistical significance, P < 0·05.