Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;23(18):3423–3434. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002165

Table 2.

Overall descriptive results (M, sd, CI) and correlations

Descriptives
95 % CI Correlations
Mean sd LB UB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Variable
 1. Acceptance of interventions 5·49 1·00 5·43 5·54
 2. Importance of reducing sugar intake (all age groups) 6·50 0·77 6·46 6·55 0·41***
 3. Attitudes towards sugar intake reduction in Portugal 6·64 0·74 6·60 6·69 0·37*** 0·38***
 4. Sugar consciousness 5·44 1·55 5·34 5·53 0·29*** 0·25*** 0·26***
 5. Frequency of sugar intake 3·23 1·55 3·14 3·13 –0·18*** –0·10** –0·15*** –0·35***
 6. Perceived general health 5·25 1·04 5·19 5·31 0·05 0·13*** 0·09** 0·20*** –0·19***
 7. Age 36·33 13·22 35·51 37·15 0·11** 0·06 0·08** 0·17*** –0·17*** –0·04
 8. BMI 23·92 4·21 23·65 24·19 –0·02 –0·05 –0·01 –0·01 0·05 –0·29*** 0·28***

LB, lower bound of the confidence interval; UB, upper bound of the confidence interval.

**p < 0·010, ***p < 0·001.

All variables refer to the full sample (n 1010), except for BMI due to missing values in height or weight (n 951).