Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;23(17):3104–3113. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000397

Table 4.

Summary estimates of sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive likelihood ratio (LR+)* and negative likelihood ratio (LR–) at selected MUAC cut-offs for all studies combined

MUAC (cm) SENS 95% CI SPEC 95% CI LR+ 95% CI LR– 95% CI No. of studies
≤19·0 4·9 2·2, 10·5 99·7 99·2, 99·9 16·7 5·7, 48·6 1·0 0·9, 1·0 15
≤19·5 7·9 4·1, 14·7 99·6 99·0, 99·9 20·8 9·2, 46·9 0·9 0·9, 1·0 15
≤20·0 11·3 6·0, 20·2 99·6 98·9, 99·9 31·8 13·2, 76·4 0·9 0·8, 1·0 16
≤20·5 16·0 9·4, 26·0 99·3 98·3, 99·7 22·9 11·6, 45·0 0·8 0·8, 0·9 17
≤21·0 22·8 13·9, 35·1 99·0 97·5, 99·6 22·1 12·2, 40·2 0·8 0·7, 0·9 18
≤21·5 31·0 20·0, 44·7 98·4 95·7, 99·4 19·6 9·2, 41·8 0·7 0·6, 0·8 19
≤22·0 45·5 29·9, 62·0 96·4 89·7, 98·8 12·7 5·8, 27·8 0·6 0·4, 0·7 19
≤22·5 58·1 37·7, 76·1 94·7 85·2, 98·3 11·1 5·1, 24·1 0·4 0·3, 0·7 20
≤23·0 64·8 47·0, 79·3 93·3 86·4, 96·9 9·7 5·8, 16·4 0·4 0·2, 0·6 19
≤23·5 75·1 61·2, 85·2 89·0 79·4, 94·4 6·8 4·0, 11·6 0·3 0·2, 0·4 19
≤24·0 84·1 74·1, 90·8 83·2 71·7, 90·7 5·0 3·1, 8·1 0·2 0·1, 0·3 19
≤24·5 89·9 82·1, 94·6 77·4 64·1, 86·8 4·0 2·5, 6·3 0·1 0·1, 0·2 19
≤25·0 92·9 87·7, 96·0 73·3 61·8, 82·3 3·5 2·4, 5·0 0·1 0·1, 0·2 18
≤25·5 95·7 92·0, 97·7 66·7 53·8, 77·6 2·9 2·0, 4·1 0·1 0·0, 0·1 18
≤26·0 97·6 94·6, 98·9 58·7 44·8, 71·3 2·4 1·7, 3·2 0·0 0·0, 0·1 18
≤26·5 98·0 95·7, 99·1 51·0 37·3, 64·6 2·0 1·5, 2·6 0·0 0·0, 0·1 18

MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference; CI, confidence interval.

*

LR+ denotes the ratio between the probability of MUAC ≤cut-off given BMI < 18·5 kg/m2 and the probability of MUAC ≤cut-off given BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 = SENS/(1–SPEC).

LR– denotes the ratio between the probability of MUAC >cut-off given BMI < 18·5 kg/m2 and the probability of MUAC >cut-off given BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 = (1–SENS)/SPEC.