Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;23(17):3104–3113. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000397

Table 5.

Comparing false-negative (FN) and false-positive (FP) rates between various subgroups of participants and studies

MUAC cut-off (cm) All data combined Low prevalence studies removed* LMIC only Males Females HIV-negative HIV-positive
FN(%) FP§(%) FN (%) FP (%) FN (%) FP (%) FN (%) FP (%) FN (%) FP (%) FN (%) FP (%) FN (%) FP (%)
23·0 35 7 28 10 28 10 46 5 25 6 58 2 29 6
23·5 25 11 19 16 19 17 36 8 17 10 43 3 22 10
24·0 16 17 12 24 12 24 24 13 12 15 32 7 15 17
24·5 10 23 7 32 8 32 16 19 8 19 24 9 11 22
25·0 7 27 4 43 5 37 11 22 5 26 20 13 9 19
25·5 4 33 2 51 3 45 6 28 3 32 16 16 4 24

LMIC, low- and middle-income countries; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference.

*

Excludes studies with low (<10 %) prevalence of individuals with BMI < 18·5 kg/m2 (ARG, GUI-TBC, MAL-HNW, NAM, SAF, USA-HIV and USA-IDU) or a low prevalence (<11 %) of individuals with normal to high BMI (MAL-HWW, ZAM).

Excludes the following upper-middle- and high-income countries: ARG, NAM, SAF, USA-HIV and USA-IDU.

FN = percentage of individuals with BMI < 18·5 kg/m2 who are missed using the MUAC cut-off.

§

FP = percentage of individuals with BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 who are referred for further screening.