Table 2.
Generalised estimating equation regression results for the presence of a home garden, fruit and vegetable intake and BMI (n 3889)
| Predictor variables | Regression 1: presence of a home garden | Regression 2: fruit and vegetable intake (meeting suggested intake/not meeting) | Regression 3: BMI | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95 % CI lower | 95 % CI upper | OR | 95 % CI lower | 95 % CI upper | Estimate | 95 % CI lower | 95 % CI upper | |
| Garden (1 = yes, 0 = no) | 2·08* | 1·69 | 2·55 | –0·94* | –1·36 | –0·52 | |||
| Gender (1 = female, 0 = male) | 0·89 | 0·77 | 1·02 | 0·93 | 0·76 | 1·13 | –0·76* | –1·18 | –0·34 |
| Age | 1·00 | 0·99 | 1·00 | 0·99* | 0·99 | 1·00 | 0·07* | 0·06 | 0·09 |
| Race | |||||||||
| White (reference) | 1·00 | 1·00 | |||||||
| Black | 0·44* | 0·34 | 0·56 | 1·45* | 1·10 | 1·92 | 1·06* | 0·41 | 1·70 |
| Asian | 1·40* | 1·003 | 1·95 | 0·86 | 0·56 | 1·30 | –3·19* | –3·96 | –2·41 |
| Hispanic | 0·94 | 0·77 | 1·14 | 0·96 | 0·71 | 1·29 | 0·45 | –0·13 | 1·02 |
| Income | |||||||||
| <$15 000 (reference) | 1·00 | 1·00 | |||||||
| $15 000–24 999 | 1·33 | 0·99 | 1·78 | 1·16 | 0·71 | 1·90 | –0·60 | –1·55 | 0·36 |
| $25 000–34 999 | 1·25 | 0·90 | 1·73 | 1·01 | 0·59 | 1·73 | –0·80 | –1·77 | 0·17 |
| $35 000–49 999 | 1·67* | 1·24 | 2·25 | 1·32 | 0·87 | 1·99 | –1·03* | –1·92 | –0·13 |
| $50 000–$74 999 | 1·80* | 1·37 | 2·37 | 1·53* | 1·03 | 2·27 | –1·28* | –2·20 | –0·36 |
| $75 000–99 999 | 2·52* | 1·91 | 3·32 | 1·77* | 1·19 | 2·65 | –1·76* | –2·67 | –0·85 |
| ≥$100 000 | 2·33* | 1·77 | 3·06 | 2·04* | 1·39 | 2·99 | –1·91* | –2·77 | –1·05 |
| RUCC | |||||||||
| RUCC 1 (urban) (reference) | 1·00 | 1·00 | |||||||
| RUCC 2 (semi-urban) | 1·38* | 1·10 | 1·72 | 0·95 | 0·70 | 1·29 | 0·82* | 0·18 | 1·46 |
| RUCC 3 (rural) | 1·52* | 1·18 | 1·96 | 0·84 | 0·61 | 1·16 | 0·67 | –0·06 | 1·41 |
RUCC, Rural-Urban Continuum Code.
*
Significant at the 5 % level.