Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 24;23(17):3148–3159. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003835

Table 5.

Hazard ratio (95 % CI) including the probable breast cancer cases for each quartile of Western and Mediterranean dietary pattern in the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra Project

Dietary pattern
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 P for trend
Western dietary pattern
 Cases 43 37 45 43
 Person-years of follow-up 24 952 25 864 26 744 28 288
 Incidence rate/10 000 person year 17·23 14·31 16·83 15·20
Model 1 0·073
 HR 1 0·99 1·35 1·41
 95 % CI ref 0·64, 1·54 0·88, 2·06 0·90, 2·19
Model 2 0·088
 HR 1 1·01 1·38 1·39
 95 % CI ref 0·65, 1·58 0·89, 2·13 0·88, 2·19
Model 3 0·127
 HR 1 1·01 1·36 1·36
 95 % CI ref 0·64, 1·57 0·88, 2·11 0·85, 2·19
Model 4 0·099
 HR 1 1·04 1·40 1·39
 95 % CI ref 0·67, 1·62 0·91, 2·17 0·87, 2·21
Mediterranean dietary pattern
 Cases 40 45 36 47
 Person-years of follow-up 26 613 26 743 26 719 25 772
 Incidence rate/10 000 person year 15·03 16·83 13·47 18·24
Model 1 0·615
 HR 1 1·12 0·89 1·18
 95 % CI ref 0·73, 1·72 0·56, 1·39 0·77, 1·81
Model 2 0·650
 HR 1 1·12 0·89 1·17
 95 % CI ref 0·73, 1·73 0·56, 1·40 0·76, 1·80
Model 3 0·760
 HR 1 1·03 0·78 0·95
 95 % CI ref 0·64, 1·66 0·44, 1·36 0·50, 1·82
Model 4 0·717
 HR 1 0·94 0·67 0·92
 95 % CI ref 0·57, 1·55 0·38, 1·20 0·50, 1·69

Model 1: age as underlying time variable in all analyses and all analyses stratified by age (in decades) and recruitment period (3 categories: 1999–2003, 2004–2009, 2009-ongoing).

Model 2: adjusted for height (continuous), smoking habit (3 categories), leisure-time physical activity (tertiles), alcohol intake (continuous), BMI (3 categories), age of menarche (4 categories), pregnancies of at least 6 months (continuous), pregnancies before the age of 30 years (yes/no), lifetime breastfeeding (continuous), use of hormone replacement therapy (yes/no), time of use of hormone replacement therapy (continuous), years of university studies (4 categories), family history of BC (3 categories) and age at menopause (3 categories), with age as underlying time variable in all analyses and all analyses stratified by age (in decades) and recruitment period (three categories: 1999–2003, 2004–2009, 2009-ongoing).

Model 3: additionally adjusted for total energy intake (continuous) and diabetes (yes/no).

Model 4: adjusted for propensity scores (tertiles) of adherence to the quartiles of the dietary patterns calculated with the potential confounders included in model 2.