Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 4;23(17):3226–3235. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020002931

Table 4.

Impact of food on the move markets

Overall (n 314, %) Currently receive SNAP (n 250, %) Do not currently receive SNAP (n 64, %) P
At least half of FV come from FOTM 76·2 81·3 55·9 <0·01*
Daily fruit consumption 0·06
 <1 cup 38·1 35·1 50·0
 1–2 cups 43·0 46·0 31·3
 2 cups or more 18·9 19·0 18·8
Daily vegetable consumption 0·04*
 <1 cup 31·1 27·8 43·8
 1–2 cups 39·4 40·7 34·4
 2 cups or more 29·5 31·5 21·9
Customers agree that…
 Shopping at FOTM is more convenient 88·3 90·7 79·0 0·03*
 FV at FOTM cost less 74·8 80·3 53·2 <0·01*
Because they shop at FOTM, customers agree that they are able to…
 Buy more fruits and vegetables 84·4 89·8 63·5 <0·01*
 Eat more fruits and vegetables 84·9 88·9 68·9 <0·01*
 Better manage their health 84·5 87·7 71·7 <0·01*
 Better manage weight 72·8 75·0 63·8 0·09
 Eat a healthier diet 85·2 88·1 73·3 0·01*
 Have more contact with people 78·4 79·3 75·0 0·58
 Feel more connected to community 73·1 75·5 63·3 0·07

SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; FV, fruits and vegetables; FOTM, Food on the Move.

*

Statistically significant at the 0·05 level.