Table 2.

Summary of the results (n 90)

	Control (standard wine) (n 27)		Low-alcohol wine (n 33)		Low-alcohol wine blind (n 30)		Test value ANOVA (F)
	M	sd	M	sd	M	sd
Wine consumed (ml)†	152·42	73·06	162·00	75·54	170·17	65·13	F 2,86 = 0·43, P = 0·65
Alcohol consumed (ml)†	19·05a	9·13	12·96b	6·04	13·61b	5·21	F 2,86 = 6·62*, P < 0·01 (η 2 = 0·13)
Bread consumed (slices)	2·11	1·45	2·09	1·33	1·93	1·31	F 2,87 = 0·15, P = 0·86
Water consumed (ml)‡	158·26	128·97	159·25	119·32	111·55	104·58	F 2,85 = 1·56, P = 0·22
Liking of the wine§	6·22	0·93	5·61	1·32	5·87	1·34	F 2,87 = 2·01, P = 0·14
Pleasantness to drink‖	6·04	0·90	5·64	1·25	6·00	0·98	F 2,87 = 1·35, P = 0·27
Willingness to pay¶	3·63a	0·79	3·09b	0·91	3·27a,b	0·79	F 2,87 = 3·14*, P < 0·05 (η 2 = 0·07)

^†In the analysis of the consumed amount of wine, a cut-off score of ≥30 ml was used, resulting in the exclusion of one participant for that particular analysis (n 89).

^‡The water consumption of two participants was not recorded (n 88).

^§Liking the wine was measured on a seven-point scale.

^‖Pleasantness to drink the wine was measured on a seven-point scale.

^¶Willingness to pay was measured on a five-point scale (1 = $0AUD; 2 = $0–10AUD; 3 = $10–15AUD; 4 = $15–20AUD; 5 = $20AUD or more).

^a,bPost hoc multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey-HSD test, for three comparisons. Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (mean values <0·05) between conditions.

^*P < 0·05.