Table 2.
Product-level sales increases associated with price promotions: decomposition into primary (purchase acceleration and increased consumption) and secondary effects*
Author | Date | Product category | Increased consumption (%) | Purchase acceleration (%) | Combined (primary) (%) | Switching (secondary) (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unit sales decomposition approach | ||||||
Teunter(40) | 2002 | Soft drinks | 27 | 38 | 65 | 34 |
Fruit juice | 17 | 58 | 75 | 25 | ||
Ground coffee | 14 | 48 | 62 | 39 | ||
Potato chips | 46 | 41 | 87 | 13 | ||
Candy bars | 10 | 63 | 73 | 27 | ||
Pasta | 14 | 47 | 61 | 39 | ||
Average | 21 | 46 | 67 | 33 | ||
Van Heerde et al. (41) | 2003 | Eleven products (as in Bell et al.) | 33 | 67 | ||
Sun et al.(42) | 2003 | Ketchup | 44 | 56 | ||
Van Heerde et al.(43) | 2004 | Tuna | 31 | 38 | 69 | 31 |
Peanut butter | 33 | 24 | 57 | 43 | ||
Average | 35 | 32 | 67 | 33 | ||
Nair et al.(44) | 2005 | Orange juice | 92 | 8 | ||
Ailawadi et al.(45) | 2007 | Yoghurt (average across brands) | 56 | 9 | 65 | 35 |
Ketchup (average across brands) | 39 | 18 | 57 | 44 | ||
Chan et al.(38) | 2008 | Tuna | 29 | 43 | 72 | 28 |
Ebling and Klapper(46) | 2010 | Beverage | 52 | 48 | ||
Spread | 50 | 50 | ||||
Dessert | 74 | 26 | ||||
Counterfactual analysis | ||||||
Ailawadi and Neslin(24) | 1998 | Yoghurt | 35 | |||
Ketchup | 12 | |||||
Sun(25) | 2005 | Yoghurt | 43 | 18 | 61 | 39 |
Tuna | 33 | 25 | 58 | 42 |