Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: F S Sci. 2023 Apr 5;4(2):172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.xfss.2023.03.006

Table 2.

Associations between keloids, hypertrophic scars, and fibroid incidence among 1,230 participants in the Study of Environment, Lifestyle & Fibroids (SELF), Detroit, Michigan, 2010–2018.

Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)
Exposure category No. exposed (n = 1,230) Incident cases (n = 293) Person-years (n = 5,312) Minimally adjusteda Fully adjustedb
Keloid scar
No 1031 242 4432 Referent Referent
Yes 199 51 880 1.03 (0.77, 1.39) 1.04 (0.77, 1.40)
Any abnormal scarringc
No 652 147 2807 Referent Referent
Yes 578 146 2505 1.08 (0.86, 1.35) 1.10 (0.88, 1.38)
a

Cox model with age as the time scale with no further covariate adjustment.

b

Cox model with age as the time scale further adjusted for age at menarche (≤10, 11, 12, 13, or ≥14 years), and time-varying parity (0, 1–2, or ≥3 births), years since last birth (<3 or ≥3 years ago including no births), years since last use of injection contraceptive (<2 or ≥2 years including never), household income (<$20,000 or ≥$20,000 per year), current smoker (no or yes), and body mass index (<30.0, 30.0-<35.0, 35.0-<40.0, or ≥40.0 kg/m2).

c

Report of either keloid or hypertrophic scar.