Table 2.
CNN-based prediction performances under models using different inputs.
Input | ACC (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 72.52 ± 1.12*** | 73.10 ± 1.80** | 72.03 ± 1.72*** | 0.7904 ± 0.0214*** |
CEST | 74.01 ± 1.15*** | 75.70 ± 3.00* | 72.50 ± 1.14*** | 0.8022 ± 0.0147*** |
T1 + CEST | 81.75 ± 1.98 | 79.64 ± 3.33 | 83.68 ± 3.03 | 0.8689 ± 0.0145* |
T1 + annotation | 75.76 ± 2.02** | 74.47 ± 3.05** | 76.70 ± 3.74* | 0.8293 ± 0.0221** |
CEST + annotation | 74.88 ± 2.58** | 74.37 ± 4.24** | 75.28 ± 2.27* | 0.8192 ± 0.0216** |
T1 + CEST + annotation | 82.94 ± 1.23 | 82.35 ± 1.87 | 83.45 ± 2.50 | 0.8868 ± 0.0055 |
The data are reported in form of “Mean ± STD”. * “CEST + T1 + annotation” is significantly higher than the indicated method at p < 0.05 level. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.