Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 11;4(5):100499. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100499

Table 3.

Frequency of EML4::ALK Fusion Variants and TP53 Mutations and Response to Lorlatinib and Crizotinib (Asian Population)

Biomarker Lorlatinib (n = 59) Crizotinib (n = 61)
ctDNA, n (%) 44 (75) 48 (79)
ALK fusion, n (%) 26 (59) 31 (65)
Lorlatinib Crizotinib
n (%) ORR, % (95% CI)a PFS, median, mo (95% CI)b DOR, median, mo (95% CI)b n (%) ORR, % (95% CI)a PFS, median, mo (95% CI)b DOR, median, mo (95% CI)b
EML4::ALK variant 1 6 (14) 100 (54–100) NR (NR–NR) NR (NR–NR) 11 (23) 36 (11–69) 7.4 (5.5–12.9) NR (5.5–NR)
 PFS HR (95% CI) 0.13 (0.015–1.051)
EML4::ALK variant 3 11 (25) 82 (48–98) NR (5.3–NR) NR (12.8–NR) 13 (27) 77 (46–95) 10.3 (5.4–12.8) 9.6 (4.6–12.8)
 PFS HR (95% CI) 0.25 (0.064–0.944)
TP53 mutation positive 16 (36) 63 (35–85) NR (5.3–NR) NR (NR–NR) 18 (38) 56 (31–79) 5.6 (3.7–12.9) 8.5 (4.6–NR)
TP53 mutation negative 28 (64) 79 (59–92) NR (18.4–NR) NR (16.5–NR) 30 (62) 57 (37–75) 11.4 (10.9–14.8) 12.8 (9.4–NR)

CI, confidence interval; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; DOR, duration of response; HR, hazard ratio; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival.

a

Clopper-Pearson method.

b

Brookmeyer and Crowley method.